Suppr超能文献

秒表法与传统疼痛评估方法对偏头痛患者曲坦类药物早期反应检测的比较敏感性:一项随机、开放标签的试点研究结果

Comparative sensitivity of stopwatch methodology and conventional pain assessment measures for detecting early response to triptans in migraine: results of a randomized, open-label pilot study.

作者信息

Sunshine Abraham, Mulhern Serena A, Olson Nancy, Elkind Arthur, Almas Mary, Sikes Carolyn

机构信息

Analgesic Development Ltd., New York, New York, USA; New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA New York, USA.

Analgesic Development Ltd., New York, New York, USA; New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA New York, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2006 Aug;28(8):1107-1115. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.08.010.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The standard measure of efficacy used in migraine trials is a 4-point patient-rated headache pain intensity (HPI) scale. However, it has been suggested that using a stopwatch to measure the time to meaningful pain relief can provide a more precise measurement of treatment response.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the sensitivity of a stopwatch method for detecting meaningful relief of headache pain and the correlation of this method with the HPI scale and a 5-point pain relief scale.

METHODS

In this open-label, parallel-group pilot study, patients were randomized to receive oral eletriptan 40 mg, eletriptan 80 mg, or rizatriptan 10 mg for the treatment of a single acute migraine attack. The effect of study treatment on migraine pain was assessed immediately before dosing and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 4 hours after dosing. At each time point, patients recorded the 3 types of pain assessment in a patient diary. HPI was rated using the standard 4-point International Headache Society pain intensity scale (from 0 = no pain to 3 = severe pain). Pain relief was rated on a 5-point pain relief scale (from 4 = no relief to 0 = complete relief). The time to the onset of meaningful pain relief was measured using a stopwatch. At 4 hours after dosing, patients provided a global rating of the overall efficacy of study medication on a 5-point scale (from 0 = poor to 4 = excellent).

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients participated in the trial (78.5% female; mean [SD] age, 37.7 [9.8] years; 58.2% white). The median times to meaningful pain relief measured by stopwatch were 84, 72, and 93 minutes for eletriptan 40 mg, eletriptan 80 mg, and rizatriptan 10 mg, respectively (log-rank P = 0.029, eletriptan 80 mg vs rizatriptan 10 mg). At 90 minutes (approximating the median time to meaningful pain relief on the stopwatch), headache response rates using HPI scoring (mild to no pain) were 65%, 68%, and 52% in the respective treatment groups, with no significant difference between groups. On the pain relief scale, the corresponding mean (SD) scores at 90 minutes were 1.6 (1.2), 1.4 (1.3), and 2.0 (1.4) (P = NS). The pain relief-defined response (> or = 75% pain relief) at 90 minutes did not differ significantly between the 3 treatment groups (62%, 56%, and 48%). Detection of early improvement (0.5 and 1 hour) was similar with the HPI and pain relief scales.

CONCLUSION

The results of this open-label pilot study suggest the convergent validity of 3 pain-assessment methods in migraine, but indicate that the use of a stopwatch may be a more sensitive method for detecting between-group differences.

摘要

背景

偏头痛试验中使用的疗效标准测量方法是4分制患者自评头痛疼痛强度(HPI)量表。然而,有人提出使用秒表测量有意义的疼痛缓解时间可以更精确地测量治疗反应。

目的

本研究评估了秒表法检测头痛疼痛有意义缓解的敏感性,以及该方法与HPI量表和5分制疼痛缓解量表的相关性。

方法

在这项开放标签、平行组的试点研究中,患者被随机分配接受口服依立曲坦40mg、依立曲坦80mg或利扎曲坦10mg治疗单次急性偏头痛发作。在给药前以及给药后0.5、1、1.5、2、3和4小时评估研究治疗对偏头痛疼痛的影响。在每个时间点,患者在患者日记中记录3种疼痛评估类型。使用标准的4分制国际头痛协会疼痛强度量表(从0 = 无疼痛到3 = 严重疼痛)对HPI进行评分。使用5分制疼痛缓解量表(从4 = 无缓解到0 = 完全缓解)对疼痛缓解进行评分。使用秒表测量有意义的疼痛缓解开始时间。给药后4小时,患者对研究药物的总体疗效进行5分制总体评分(从0 = 差到4 = 优)。

结果

79名患者参与了试验(78.5%为女性;平均[标准差]年龄为37.7[9.8]岁;58.2%为白人)。依立曲坦40mg、依立曲坦80mg和利扎曲坦10mg通过秒表测量的有意义疼痛缓解的中位时间分别为84、72和93分钟(对数秩检验P = 0.029,依立曲坦80mg与利扎曲坦10mg相比)。在90分钟时(接近秒表测量的有意义疼痛缓解的中位时间),各治疗组使用HPI评分(轻度至无疼痛)的头痛缓解率分别为65%、68%和52%,组间无显著差异。在疼痛缓解量表上,90分钟时相应的平均(标准差)分数分别为1.6(1.2)、1.4(1.3)和2.0(1.4)(P = 无统计学意义)。90分钟时疼痛缓解定义的反应(疼痛缓解≥75%)在3个治疗组之间无显著差异(62%、56%和48%)。HPI和疼痛缓解量表在检测早期改善(0.5和1小时)方面相似。

结论

这项开放标签试点研究的结果表明偏头痛中3种疼痛评估方法具有收敛效度,但表明使用秒表可能是检测组间差异更敏感的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验