Verplanken Bas
University of Tromsø, Norway.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2006 Sep;45(Pt 3):639-56. doi: 10.1348/014466605X49122.
Progress in habit theory can be made by distinguishing habit from frequency of occurrence, and using independent measures for these constructs. This proposition was investigated in three studies using a longitudinal, cross-sectional and experimental design on eating, mental habits and word processing, respectively. In Study 1, snacking habit and past snacking frequency independently predicted later snacking behaviour, while controlling for the theory of planned behaviour variables. Habit fully mediated the effect of past on later behaviour. In Study 2, habitual negative self-thinking and past frequency of negative self-thoughts independently predicted self-esteem and the presence of depressive and anxiety symptoms. In Study 3, habit varied as a function of experimentally manipulated task complexity, while behavioural frequency was held constant. Taken together, while repetition is necessary for habits to develop, these studies demonstrate that habit should not be equated with frequency of occurrence, but rather should be considered as a mental construct involving features of automaticity, such as lack of awareness, difficulty to control and mental efficiency.
习惯理论的进展可以通过区分习惯与发生频率,并对这些概念使用独立的测量方法来实现。这一命题在三项研究中分别通过纵向、横断面和实验设计进行了调查,研究对象分别为饮食、思维习惯和文字处理。在研究1中,吃零食的习惯和过去吃零食的频率在控制计划行为理论变量的同时,独立预测了后来的吃零食行为。习惯完全中介了过去行为对后来行为的影响。在研究2中,习惯性消极自我思考和过去消极自我思考的频率独立预测了自尊以及抑郁和焦虑症状的出现。在研究3中,习惯随着实验操纵的任务复杂性而变化,而行为频率保持不变。综上所述,虽然重复是习惯形成所必需的,但这些研究表明,习惯不应等同于发生频率,而应被视为一种涉及自动性特征的心理结构,如缺乏意识、难以控制和心理效率。