Ruel M T, Pelletier D L, Habicht J P, Mason J B, Chobokoane C S, Maruping A P
Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Bull World Health Organ. 1990;68(4):483-91.
Reported are the results of a study that compared mothers' understanding of two growth monitoring charts in Lesotho, which was carried out to assist the government in selecting a national growth chart. The study was conducted over 4 months in nine primary health care (PHC) clinics, where 1221 mothers were enrolled. Mothers were assigned to one of the following chart groups: "road-to-health" (RTH), "growth surveillance" (GS), or no chart (controls). Mothers in the first two groups received instruction on their respective chart during monthly growth monitoring sessions and were tested on their knowledge of this chart before and after the follow-up period. The mothers in the control group were tested on the RTH and GS charts at the beginning and at the end of the study. The results indicated that mothers who received training on either chart markedly improved their understanding compared with the control group and that the RTH group understood their chart better than the GS group did theirs.
报告了一项研究的结果,该研究比较了莱索托母亲对两种生长监测图表的理解,其目的是协助政府选择全国性的生长图表。该研究在九个初级卫生保健(PHC)诊所进行了四个月,共有1221名母亲参与。母亲们被分配到以下图表组之一:“健康之路”(RTH)、“生长监测”(GS)或无图表(对照组)。前两组的母亲在每月生长监测期间接受了关于各自图表的指导,并在随访期前后对她们对该图表的知识进行了测试。对照组的母亲在研究开始和结束时对RTH和GS图表进行了测试。结果表明,与对照组相比,接受任何一种图表培训的母亲对其理解都有显著提高,并且RTH组对其图表的理解比GS组更好。