Slawin Kevin M
Rev Urol. 2002 Spring;4(2):90-4.
Without reliable clinical or pathologic predictors of local recurrence, selection of patients for adjuvant radiotherapy based on any combination of clinical or pathological parameters is bound to lead to the unnecessary treatment of significant numbers of patients whose disease might not have ultimately recurred or who might have been destined to have recurrence with extrapelvic metastatic disease, for which pelvic radiation would be ineffective. Furthermore, new ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assays can identify patients actually failing surgery with a detectable and rising PSA earlier than ever, when disease volume is low and still amenable to salvage radiation therapy, and can allow the calculation of the PSA doubling time, which is gaining widespread acceptance as a proven predictor of response to salvage radiation therapy in this setting. Therefore, the rationale for preemptive adjuvant radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy is weaker than ever.
由于缺乏可靠的局部复发临床或病理预测指标,基于临床或病理参数的任何组合来选择辅助放疗的患者,必然会导致大量患者接受不必要的治疗,这些患者的疾病最终可能不会复发,或者可能注定会出现盆腔外转移疾病的复发,而盆腔放疗对此无效。此外,新的超敏前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测方法能够比以往更早地识别出手术实际失败且PSA可检测到并呈上升趋势的患者,此时疾病体积较小,仍适合挽救性放射治疗,并且可以计算PSA倍增时间,在这种情况下,PSA倍增时间作为挽救性放射治疗反应的已证实预测指标正得到广泛认可。因此,前列腺癌根治术后预防性辅助放疗的理论依据比以往任何时候都更弱。