Sarkar Sahotra
Biodiversity and Biocultural Conservation Laboratory, Section of Integrative Biology and Department of Philosophy, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, #C3500, Austin, TX, 78712-1180, USA.
Acta Biotheor. 2006;54(2):133-40; discussion 141-6. doi: 10.1007/s10441-006-8259-z.
Ricotta argues against the existence of a unique measure of biodiversity by pointing out that no known measure of alpha-diversity satisfies all the adequacy conditions that have traditionally been set for it. While that technical claim is correct, it is not relevant in the context of defining biodiversity which is most usefully measured by beta-diversity. The concept of complementarity provides a closely related family of measures of biodiversity which can be used for systematic conservation planning. Moreover, these measures cannot be replaced by summary statistics but must rely on inventories of biodiversity surrogates at candidate sites for conservation.
里科塔通过指出没有已知的阿尔法多样性测度能满足传统上为其设定的所有充分性条件,来论证不存在独特的生物多样性测度。虽然这一技术主张是正确的,但在定义生物多样性的背景下它并不相关,生物多样性最有用的衡量方式是贝塔多样性。互补性概念提供了一系列与之密切相关的生物多样性测度,可用于系统的保护规划。此外,这些测度不能被汇总统计数据所取代,而必须依赖于候选保护地点的生物多样性替代指标清单。