• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可调节胃束带术失败后,胃内刺激无效。

Intragastric stimulation is ineffective after failed adjustable gastric banding.

作者信息

Hoeller Elisabeth, Aigner Franz, Margreiter Raimund, Weiss Helmut

机构信息

Medical University Innsbruck, Department of General and Transplant Surgery, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2006 Sep;16(9):1160-5. doi: 10.1381/096089206778392301.

DOI:10.1381/096089206778392301
PMID:16989699
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastric pacing has gained popularity as an effective and safe minimally invasive procedure to treat morbid obesity. This study evaluates the outcome of gastric pacing as a bariatric re-do procedure in patients who developed failure after adjustable gastric banding (AGB) due to band migration.

METHODS

8 patients were enrolled in this analysis. After implantation of an AGB, they had developed band failure due to band migration. The implantable gastric stimulator (IGS) was implanted laparoscopically as a second-line operation after gastroscopic removal of the band.

RESULTS

Median time (range) from AGB complication to implantation of the IGS was 42 (10.3-50.3) months. During that time, all 8 patients had regained significant weight. All IGS devices could be implanted laparoscopically, without intra- or perioperative complications. The minimal body weight following IGS implantation was reached after 5 (0-12) months. The median observation time was 23 (11.3-27.5) months. 1 year after IGS implantation (n=7), median weight was 116 (98-165) kg, equivalent to a median BMI of 41.1 (36.055.8) kg/m(2), which is not statistically different to preoperative values and therefore prompted us to stop our ongoing trial. In all but 2 patients, the IGS device was explanted. During the same procedure, patients underwent a gastric sleeve resection (n=4) or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n=2).

CONCLUSION

The implantation of an IGS was an ineffective second-line operation after AGB migration.

摘要

背景

胃起搏作为一种治疗病态肥胖的有效且安全的微创手术已受到广泛关注。本研究评估了胃起搏作为一种减肥二次手术在因可调节胃束带(AGB)移位而失败的患者中的疗效。

方法

8例患者纳入本分析。在植入AGB后,他们因束带移位出现了束带失败。在胃镜下取出束带后,通过腹腔镜植入可植入式胃刺激器(IGS)作为二线手术。

结果

从AGB并发症到植入IGS的中位时间(范围)为42(10.3 - 50.3)个月。在此期间,所有8例患者体重均显著回升。所有IGS装置均可通过腹腔镜植入,无术中或围手术期并发症。IGS植入后5(0 - 12)个月达到最低体重。中位观察时间为23(11.3 - 27.5)个月。IGS植入1年后(n = 7),中位体重为116(98 - 165)kg,相当于中位BMI为41.1(36.0 - 55.8)kg/m²,与术前值无统计学差异,因此促使我们停止正在进行的试验。除2例患者外,所有患者的IGS装置均被取出。在同一手术过程中,患者接受了胃袖状切除术(n = 4)或Roux - en - Y胃旁路术(n = 2)。

结论

AGB移位后植入IGS作为二线手术无效。

相似文献

1
Intragastric stimulation is ineffective after failed adjustable gastric banding.可调节胃束带术失败后,胃内刺激无效。
Obes Surg. 2006 Sep;16(9):1160-5. doi: 10.1381/096089206778392301.
2
[Gastric pacing to treat morbid obesity: two years experience in four patients].[胃起搏治疗病态肥胖症:4例患者的两年经验]
Ann Ital Chir. 2009 Jan-Feb;80(1):25-8.
3
Treatment of morbid obesity with the Transcend Implantable Gastric Stimulator (IGS): a prospective survey.采用超越植入式胃刺激器(IGS)治疗病态肥胖:一项前瞻性调查。
Obes Surg. 2004 May;14(5):666-70. doi: 10.1381/096089204323093462.
4
Salvage of gastric restriction following staple-line dehiscence after vertical banded gastroplasty by insertion of an adjustable gastric band.通过插入可调节胃束带来挽救垂直捆绑胃成形术后吻合口裂开后的胃限制。
Obes Surg. 2005 Feb;15(2):216-22. doi: 10.1381/0960892053268345.
5
Adjustable gastric band placed around gastric bypass pouch as revision operation for failed gastric bypass.可调节胃束带环绕胃旁路术后胃囊放置,作为胃旁路手术失败后的翻修手术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009 Jan-Feb;5(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.08.012. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
6
Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch or gastric bypass for failed gastric banding: retrospective study from two institutions with preliminary results.胃束带术失败后行胆胰转流十二指肠转位术或胃旁路术:来自两家机构的回顾性研究及初步结果
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Sep-Oct;3(5):521-5. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.07.001.
7
[Preliminary outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in surgical obesity treatment].[腹腔镜可调节胃束带术和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术在外科肥胖治疗中的初步结果]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2007 Nov;23(137):344-7.
8
An update on 73 US obese pediatric patients treated with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: comorbidity resolution and compliance data.73例接受腹腔镜可调节胃束带术治疗的美国肥胖儿科患者的最新情况:合并症缓解及依从性数据
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Jan;43(1):141-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.09.035.
9
Vertical banded gastroplasty versus adjustable gastric banding: prospective long-term follow-up study.垂直捆绑胃成形术与可调节胃束带术:前瞻性长期随访研究
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Jan-Feb;3(1):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2006.08.013. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
10
Short-term outcomes for super-super obese (BMI > or =60 kg/m2) patients undergoing weight loss surgery at a high-volume bariatric surgery center: laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic gastric bypass, and open tubular gastric bypass.在一家大型减肥手术中心接受减肥手术的超级肥胖(BMI≥60 kg/m²)患者的短期结局:腹腔镜可调节胃束带术、腹腔镜胃旁路术和开放式管状胃旁路术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 May-Jun;4(3):408-15. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.10.013. Epub 2008 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Updates on gastric electrical stimulation to treat obesity: Systematic review and future perspectives.胃电刺激治疗肥胖症的最新进展:系统评价与未来展望
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Sep 16;6(9):419-31. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i9.419.
2
Parameter selection and stimulating effects of an adjustable gastric electrical stimulator in dogs.可调式胃电刺激器在犬中的参数选择和刺激效果。
Obes Surg. 2014 Jan;24(1):78-84. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1037-5.
3
Is a pouch compulsory in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after failed adjustable gastric banding?
在可调节胃束带术失败后,Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术中必须使用胃囊吗?
Obes Surg. 2008 Dec;18(12):1544-50. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9586-8. Epub 2008 Jun 28.