• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非霍奇金淋巴瘤的分组风险分类

Group risk classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

作者信息

Avilés A, Díaz-Maqueo J C, Rodríguez L, García E L, Torras V, Guzmán R

机构信息

Departamento de Hematología, Hospital de Oncología, Centro Médico Nacional, IMSS México, D.F.

出版信息

Arch Invest Med (Mex). 1990 Jan-Mar;21(1):11-6.

PMID:1699503
Abstract

Between 1980 and 1982, 162 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) or CHOP plus bleomycin. At the moment when the patient were diagnosed all clinical characteristics were evaluated according to a multiple regression analysis model, which has the following three factors associated to bad prognosis: a quick clinical evolution (less than three months) bone marrow infiltration and high levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). The Cox model of analysis also agreed that a quick clinical evolution and the high levels of LDH were bad prognosis factors. These two factors were associated with poor complete remission and short survival rates. A mathematical model was built based on the last two factors. Five groups of patients were observed with increasing risk of a poor response and a short survival rates, which allowed us to identified three prognostic groups with clear differences in both the duration of remission and survival. These groups were low, moderate and high-risk. Results analysis in this paper have important clinical implications for the design of the prospective clinical trials in patients with malignant lymphoma.

摘要

1980年至1982年间,162例非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者接受了环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松(CHOP)或CHOP加博来霉素治疗。在患者确诊时,根据多元回归分析模型对所有临床特征进行评估,该模型有以下三个与预后不良相关的因素:临床进展迅速(少于三个月)、骨髓浸润和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平高。Cox分析模型也认为临床进展迅速和LDH水平高是预后不良因素。这两个因素与完全缓解率低和生存率短有关。基于最后两个因素建立了一个数学模型。观察到五组患者反应不佳和生存率短的风险增加,这使我们能够确定三个预后组,其缓解期和生存期有明显差异。这些组为低、中、高危组。本文的结果分析对恶性淋巴瘤患者前瞻性临床试验的设计具有重要的临床意义。

相似文献

1
Group risk classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.非霍奇金淋巴瘤的分组风险分类
Arch Invest Med (Mex). 1990 Jan-Mar;21(1):11-6.
2
[Prognostic factors in low-grade lymphoma].[低度恶性淋巴瘤的预后因素]
Sangre (Barc). 1998 Jun;43(3):185-90.
3
[Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with the ProMACE- CytaBOM protocol].采用ProMACE-CytaBOM方案治疗侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1998 Sep-Oct;126(9-10):345-8.
4
Impact of three courses of intensified CHOP prior to high-dose sequential therapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation as first-line treatment in poor-risk, aggressive non-hodgkin's lymphoma: comparative analysis of Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group Studies 27 and 40.在高危侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤一线治疗中,大剂量序贯疗法联合自体干细胞移植前进行三个疗程强化CHOP方案的影响:荷兰-比利时血液肿瘤协作组研究27和40的对比分析
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;23(16):3793-801. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.039. Epub 2005 Apr 4.
5
Treatment of relapsed aggressive lymphomas: regimens with and without high-dose therapy and stem cell rescue.复发侵袭性淋巴瘤的治疗:含与不含高剂量治疗及干细胞救援的方案
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2002 May;49 Suppl 1:S13-20. doi: 10.1007/s00280-002-0447-1. Epub 2002 Apr 12.
6
[CHOP-bleo versus m-BACOD in the treatment of intermediate and high-grade malignant lymphomas].
Rev Invest Clin. 1990 Oct-Dec;42(4):271-6.
7
Efficacy of two different ProMACE-CytaBOM derived regimens in advanced aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Final report of a multicenter trial conducted by GISL.两种不同的源自ProMACE-CytaBOM方案在晚期侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤中的疗效。GISL进行的一项多中心试验的最终报告。
Haematologica. 1998 Sep;83(9):800-11.
8
Major prognostic factors of adult patients with advanced B-cell lymphoma treated with vincristine, cyclophosphamide, prednisone and doxorubicin (VEPA) or VEPA plus methotrexate (VEPA-M).
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1988 Jun;18(2):113-24.
9
[Comparison of chemotherapy CHOP vs. CHOP/VIA in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a randomized multicenter study of 132 patients. The PETHEMA group. Program for Study and Therapeutics of malignant hemopathies. Spanish Association of Hematology and Hemotherapy].[化疗CHOP方案与CHOP/VIA方案治疗侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较:132例患者的随机多中心研究。PETHEMA组。恶性血液病研究与治疗项目。西班牙血液学与血液治疗协会]
Med Clin (Barc). 1998 May 9;110(16):601-4.
10
[Long-term results in the treatment of lymphomas using polychemotherapy (CHOP)].[多药联合化疗(CHOP)治疗淋巴瘤的长期结果]
Sangre (Barc). 1989 Oct;34(5):332-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Maintenance therapy with interferon alfa 2b in patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma.干扰素α-2b对弥漫性大细胞淋巴瘤患者的维持治疗
Invest New Drugs. 1992 Nov;10(4):351-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00944195.