• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗直肠癌的手术效果——一项配对病例对照研究。

Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open surgery for rectal carcinoma--a matched case-control study.

作者信息

Uehara Keisuke, Yamamoto Seiichiro, Fujita Shin, Akasu Takayuki, Moriya Yoshihiro

机构信息

Division of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital in Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Hepatogastroenterology. 2006 Jul-Aug;53(70):531-5.

PMID:16995455
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The present study evaluated the short- and middle-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery (LS) for rectal carcinoma in comparison with a case-control series of open surgery (OS).

METHODOLOGY

Between February 1998 and December 2004, 47 patients with rectal carcinoma underwent LS. These patients were compared with a conventional OS group matched for age, gender, location of tumor, surgical procedure, extent of resection and pathological stage.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period for the LS group and the OS group was 25 and 49 months, respectively. In the LS group, median operative time was significantly longer but median blood loss was lower than those in the OS group. There was one requiring conversion to OS. Postoperative intervals until liquid and solid intakes, and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the LS group. Postoperative complications rates are similar and anastomotic leakage occurred in one patient in each group. In the LS group, the levels of white blood cell count on postoperative day 1 and C-reactive protein on postoperative days 1 and 2 were significantly lower than those in the OS group.

CONCLUSIONS

LS for rectal carcinoma provides benefits during the early postoperative period without increase in morbidity or mortality.

摘要

背景/目的:本研究对比了腹腔镜手术(LS)与开放手术(OS)病例对照系列治疗直肠癌的短期和中期手术结果。

方法

1998年2月至2004年12月期间,47例直肠癌患者接受了LS。将这些患者与按年龄、性别、肿瘤位置、手术方式、切除范围和病理分期匹配的传统OS组进行比较。

结果

LS组和OS组的中位随访期分别为25个月和49个月。在LS组中,中位手术时间明显更长,但中位失血量低于OS组。有1例需要转为OS。LS组直到液体和固体摄入的术后间隔时间以及住院时间明显更短。术后并发症发生率相似,每组各有1例患者发生吻合口漏。在LS组中,术后第1天的白细胞计数以及术后第1天和第2天的C反应蛋白水平明显低于OS组。

结论

直肠癌的LS在术后早期具有优势,且不增加发病率或死亡率。

相似文献

1
Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open surgery for rectal carcinoma--a matched case-control study.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗直肠癌的手术效果——一项配对病例对照研究。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2006 Jul-Aug;53(70):531-5.
2
[Introduction of laparoscopic splenectomy for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura].[腹腔镜脾切除术治疗免疫性血小板减少性紫癜的介绍]
Zentralbl Chir. 2004 Apr;129(2):108-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-818730.
3
Comparison between the oncologic outcome of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for T1 and T2 rectosigmoidal and rectal carcinoma: matched case-control study.T1和T2期直肠乙状结肠及直肠癌腹腔镜手术与开放手术肿瘤学结局的比较:配对病例对照研究
Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Jun;54(76):1094-7.
4
Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗中高位直肠癌前切除术:疗效评估
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Aug;49(8):1108-15. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0551-0.
5
Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer and comparison with open approach.腹腔镜经括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌的短期疗效及与开放手术的比较。
Dig Surg. 2011;28(5-6):404-9. doi: 10.1159/000332007. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
6
Early outcomes of 100 patients with laparoscopic resection for rectal neoplasm.100例直肠肿瘤患者行腹腔镜切除术的早期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2004 Nov;18(11):1592-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9249-8. Epub 2004 Oct 11.
7
Anterior resection of rectal cancer through a one hand-size incision with or without laparoscopy: proposal of one hand-size incision surgery (OHaSIS).经单手大小切口行直肠癌前切除术(有无腹腔镜辅助):单手大小切口手术(OHaSIS)方案
J Surg Res. 2005 Nov;129(1):136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.04.039. Epub 2005 Jun 14.
8
Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy: a comparative study.腹腔镜与开放性脾切除术:一项对比研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2000 Oct;10(5):291-5.
9
Impact of conversion on surgical outcomes after laparoscopic operation for rectal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 1,073 patients.直肠癌腹腔镜手术后中转开腹对手术结局的影响:一项对1073例患者的回顾性研究
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Mar;208(3):383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.12.002.
10
Results of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 157 cases.直肠腺癌腹腔镜前切除术的结果:157例回顾性分析
Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.02.020.

引用本文的文献

1
The feasibility of laparoscopic extended pelvic surgery for rectal cancer.
Surg Today. 2016 Aug;46(8):950-6. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1267-3. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
2
Initial experience of laparoscopic pelvic exenteration and comparison with conventional open surgery.腹腔镜盆腔脏器清除术的初步经验及与传统开放手术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):132-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4172-3. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
3
Evaluations of laparoscopic proctocolectomy versus traditional technique in patients with rectal cancer.直肠癌患者腹腔镜直肠结肠切除术与传统技术的评估。
JSLS. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):564-73. doi: 10.4293/108680809X12589998404489.
4
Ultrasonically activated scalpel versus monopolar electrocautery shovel in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.超声刀与单极电凝铲在腹腔镜直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术中的应用比较
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul 7;14(25):4065-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4065.