• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜经括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌的短期疗效及与开放手术的比较。

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer and comparison with open approach.

机构信息

Division of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Dig Surg. 2011;28(5-6):404-9. doi: 10.1159/000332007. Epub 2011 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1159/000332007
PMID:22189000
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR) for lower rectal cancer, and to compare them with a case-control series of open ISR.

METHODS

Between July 2002 and March 2011, 29 patients with lower rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic ISR, and 22 of 29 patients who underwent laparoscopic ISR were compared with the control open ISR group of patients matched for age, gender, operative procedure and pathological stage.

RESULTS

There was no perioperative mortality, 8 complications occurred in 7 patients, and the morbidity rate was 24.1% (7/29). Leakage occurred in 1 patient (3.4%) in the laparoscopic ISR group. Regarding the matched case-control study, the operative time was significantly longer (p = 0.0007), but blood loss was significantly lower (p = 0.0003) in the laparoscopic ISR group. The median postoperative hospital stay was 8 days in the laparoscopic ISR group, which was significantly shorter than in the open ISR group (14 days). Postoperative complication rates were similar. In the laparoscopic ISR group, the levels of C-reactive protein on postoperative days 1-3 were significantly lower than in the open ISR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic ISR for lower rectal cancer provides benefits in the early postoperative period without increasing morbidity or mortality.

摘要

背景/目的:评估腹腔镜经肛门直肠内括约肌切除术(ISR)治疗低位直肠癌的短期手术效果,并与开腹 ISR 的病例对照系列进行比较。

方法

2002 年 7 月至 2011 年 3 月,29 例低位直肠癌患者接受了腹腔镜 ISR,其中 29 例患者中有 22 例与开腹 ISR 组进行了比较,该组患者在年龄、性别、手术方式和病理分期方面相匹配。

结果

无围手术期死亡,7 例患者发生 8 例并发症,发病率为 24.1%(7/29)。腹腔镜 ISR 组有 1 例(3.4%)发生漏诊。关于匹配的病例对照研究,腹腔镜 ISR 组的手术时间明显延长(p = 0.0007),但出血量明显减少(p = 0.0003)。腹腔镜 ISR 组的中位术后住院时间为 8 天,明显短于开腹 ISR 组(14 天)。术后并发症发生率相似。在腹腔镜 ISR 组,术后第 1-3 天的 C 反应蛋白水平明显低于开腹 ISR 组。

结论

腹腔镜 ISR 治疗低位直肠癌在不增加发病率或死亡率的情况下,可在术后早期获益。

相似文献

1
Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer and comparison with open approach.腹腔镜经括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌的短期疗效及与开放手术的比较。
Dig Surg. 2011;28(5-6):404-9. doi: 10.1159/000332007. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
2
Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.经肛门入路机器人辅助吻合术联合或不联合经肛门内外括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌:先经肛门入路,再行机器人手术。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;19(1):154-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1952-4. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
3
Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: intermediate-term oncologic outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹经括约肌间切除术联合结肠肛管吻合术治疗低位直肠癌:中期肿瘤学结果。
Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):941-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318236c448.
4
Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open surgery for rectal carcinoma--a matched case-control study.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗直肠癌的手术效果——一项配对病例对照研究。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2006 Jul-Aug;53(70):531-5.
5
Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗中高位直肠癌前切除术:疗效评估
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Aug;49(8):1108-15. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0551-0.
6
Feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for patients with cT1-T2 low rectal cancer.经肛门内括约肌间切除术治疗 cT1-T2 低位直肠癌的可行性。
Dig Surg. 2013;30(4-6):272-7. doi: 10.1159/000354034. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
7
Delayed anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: report of four cases and literature review.腹腔镜低位直肠癌括约肌间切除术后延迟性吻合口漏:4例报告及文献复习
World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;15(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1208-2.
8
Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: clinical outcomes of open versus laparoscopic approach and multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic surgery.经肛门内外括约肌间切除术治疗超低位直肠癌:开放与腹腔镜手术的临床结局对比,以及腹腔镜手术学习曲线的多维分析。
J Surg Res. 2013 Aug;183(2):524-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.049. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
9
Improved short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection for colon and rectal cancer in an area health service: a multicenter study.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌切除术在区域卫生服务中的短期疗效比较:一项多中心研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Jan;55(1):42-50. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318239341f.
10
Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.腹腔镜低位直肠癌括约肌间切除术
Surg Oncol. 2007 Dec;16 Suppl 1:S117-20. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2007.10.006. Epub 2007 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient selection and operative strategies for laparoscopic intersphincteric resection without diverting stoma.无转流造口的腹腔镜括约肌间切除术的患者选择与手术策略
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):95983. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.95983.
2
Blood perfusion assessment by near-infrared fluorescence angiography of epiploic appendages in prevention of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer: a case-matched study.经近红外荧光血管造影评估网膜阑尾血供在预防超低位直肠癌经肛门内括约肌间切除术吻合口漏中的作用:一项病例匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):5446-5456. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11085-2. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
3
Laparoscopy is non-inferior to open surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗直肠癌的非劣效性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jul;13(13):e7363. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7363.
4
Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Non-Metastatic Rectal Cancer.倾向评分匹配分析腹腔镜与开放手术治疗非转移性直肠癌的效果。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Dec 1;22(12):3967-3975. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.12.3967.
5
Latest Advances in Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer.低位直肠癌括约肌间切除术的最新进展
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020 Jul 20;2020:8928109. doi: 10.1155/2020/8928109. eCollection 2020.
6
Long Term Results of Modified Intersphincteric Resections for Low Rectal Cancer: A Single Center Experience.低位直肠癌经括约肌间切除术的长期疗效:单中心经验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Nov 29;55(12):764. doi: 10.3390/medicina55120764.
7
Laparoscopic and open surgery in rectal cancer patients in Germany: short and long-term results of a large 10-year population-based cohort.德国直肠癌患者的腹腔镜手术与开放手术:一项基于10年大规模人群队列的短期和长期结果
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1132-1141. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06861-4. Epub 2019 May 30.
8
Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection versus an open approach for low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜经括约肌间切除术与开腹手术治疗低位直肠癌的比较:一项荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec 28;15(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1304-3.
9
Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for Intersphincteric Resection-Results from a Tertiary Cancer Center in India.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗括约肌间切除术的比较——来自印度一家三级癌症中心的结果
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec;8(4):474-478. doi: 10.1007/s13193-017-0672-z. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
10
Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for a lower rectal tumor.腹腔镜低位直肠肿瘤括约肌间切除术的安全性与可行性
Oncol Lett. 2017 Oct;14(4):4142-4150. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6664. Epub 2017 Jul 25.