Ariyarajah Vignendra, Frisella Mary E, Spodick David H
Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Oct 1;98(7):936-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.04.036. Epub 2006 Aug 7.
The importance of the interatrial block has often been overshadowed by the debate on the appropriate cutoff to define its excessively wide P waves. However, by far, most publications have accepted P waves of >or=110 ms to represent abnormal interatrial conduction on the electrocardiogram. These "guidelines" have been structured on anachronistic electrocardiographic standards mostly determined from references to earlier textbooks and other publications that often did not involve original work. As such, reevaluation of the top normal value for the P-wave duration in adults is probably long overdue. We reevaluated the prevalence of interatrial block in our previously published series of 500 outpatients using existing standards for normal P-wave values and compared these results with the previous known prevalence of interatrial block to generate this present report. In conclusion, the frequency of the mode duration for P waves (120 ms) suggests electrophysiologic reevaluation of the normal range.
房间阻滞的重要性常常因关于定义其过宽P波的合适截断值的争论而被忽视。然而,到目前为止,大多数出版物都接受≥110毫秒的P波来代表心电图上的异常房间传导。这些“指南”是基于过时的心电图标准构建的,这些标准大多参考早期教科书和其他出版物确定,而这些出版物往往并非原创研究。因此,早就应该重新评估成人P波持续时间的正常上限值了。我们使用现有的正常P波值标准,对我们之前发表的500例门诊患者系列中的房间阻滞患病率进行了重新评估,并将这些结果与之前已知的房间阻滞患病率进行比较,从而得出本报告。总之,P波模式持续时间(120毫秒)的频率表明需要对正常范围进行电生理重新评估。