• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会信息加工模型能否解释寄养机构中轻度智力残疾儿童的攻击行为?

Do social information-processing models explain aggressive behaviour by children with mild intellectual disabilities in residential care?

作者信息

van Nieuwenhuijzen M, de Castro B O, van der Valk I, Wijnroks L, Vermeer A, Matthys W

机构信息

Department of Developmental Psychology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Intellect Disabil Res. 2006 Nov;50(Pt 11):801-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00773.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00773.x
PMID:16999780
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine whether the social information-processing model (SIP model) applies to aggressive behaviour by children with mild intellectual disabilities (MID). The response-decision element of SIP was expected to be unnecessary to explain aggressive behaviour in these children, and SIP was expected to mediate the relation between social schemata and aggressive behaviour.

METHOD

SIP and aggressive behaviour of 130 10- to 14-year-old children with MID in residential care were assessed. The fit of various SIP models was tested with structural equation modelling.

RESULTS

The response-decision process was found not to be necessary to explain aggressive behaviour. Social schemata were indirectly related to aggressive behaviour with aggressive response generation as mediating variable.

CONCLUSIONS

Implications for SIP theory and intervention are discussed.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在检验社会信息加工模型(SIP模型)是否适用于轻度智力障碍(MID)儿童的攻击行为。预计SIP的反应决策要素对于解释这些儿童的攻击行为并非必要,并且预计SIP将调节社会图式与攻击行为之间的关系。

方法

对130名10至14岁在寄宿机构照料的MID儿童的SIP和攻击行为进行了评估。使用结构方程模型测试了各种SIP模型的拟合度。

结果

发现反应决策过程对于解释攻击行为并非必要。社会图式通过攻击反应产生作为中介变量与攻击行为间接相关。

结论

讨论了对SIP理论和干预的启示。

相似文献

1
Do social information-processing models explain aggressive behaviour by children with mild intellectual disabilities in residential care?社会信息加工模型能否解释寄养机构中轻度智力残疾儿童的攻击行为?
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2006 Nov;50(Pt 11):801-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00773.x.
2
Contextual variables affecting aggressive behaviour in individuals with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities who live in a residential facility.影响居住在寄宿机构中的轻度至边缘性智力障碍个体攻击性行为的情境变量。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009 Mar;53(3):255-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01132.x. Epub 2008 Nov 3.
3
Do children do what they say? Responses to hypothetical and real-life social problems in children with mild intellectual disabilities and behaviour problems.孩子们言行一致吗?对轻度智力残疾和行为问题儿童的假设性及现实生活社会问题的反应。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2005 Jun;49(Pt 6):419-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00674.x.
4
Impulse control and aggressive response generation as predictors of aggressive behaviour in children with mild intellectual disabilities and borderline intelligence.冲动控制和攻击反应生成作为轻度智力残疾和边缘智力儿童攻击行为的预测因素。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009 Mar;53(3):233-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01112.x. Epub 2008 Aug 4.
5
Incidence, types and characteristics of aggressive behaviour in treatment facilities for adults with mild intellectual disability and severe challenging behaviour.轻度智力残疾且有严重挑战行为的成年患者治疗机构中攻击性行为的发生率、类型及特征
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2008 Feb;52(Pt 2):114-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2007.00968.x.
6
Social goals and conflict strategies of individuals with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities who present problems of aggression.存在攻击行为问题的轻度至中度智力残疾个体的社会目标和冲突策略
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2008 May;52(Pt 5):393-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2007.01039.x. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
7
The development of a diagnostic instrument to measure social information processing in children with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities.开发一种诊断工具,用于测量轻度至边缘智力障碍儿童的社会信息处理能力。
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Jan-Feb;32(1):358-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.10.012. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
8
Prevalence and types of aggressive behaviour among adults with intellectual disabilities.成年智障者攻击性行为的患病率及类型
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2006 Sep;50(Pt 9):652-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00815.x.
9
Adults with intellectual disabilities: prevalence, incidence and remission of aggressive behaviour and related factors.成年智障者:攻击行为的患病率、发病率、缓解情况及相关因素
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009 Mar;53(3):217-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01127.x. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
10
Staff variables associated with the challenging behaviour of clients with severe or profound intellectual disabilities.与重度或极重度智力残疾客户的挑战性行为相关的工作人员变量。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009 Jul;53(7):620-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01162.x. Epub 2009 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Cognition in Children With Non-specific Intellectual Disabilities: An Exploratory Study.非特定智力障碍儿童的社会认知:一项探索性研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 11;11:1884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01884. eCollection 2020.
2
Hostile Intent Attribution and Aggressive Behavior in Children Revisited: A Meta-Analysis.重新审视儿童敌意归因和攻击行为:一项元分析。
Child Dev. 2019 Sep;90(5):e525-e547. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13255. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
3
Effectiveness of an Intervention for Children with Externalizing Behavior and Mild to Borderline Intellectual Disabilities: A Randomized Trial.
针对具有外化行为及轻度至边缘性智力障碍儿童的一项干预措施的有效性:一项随机试验。
Cognit Ther Res. 2017;41(2):237-251. doi: 10.1007/s10608-016-9815-8. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
4
Emotion discourse, social cognition, and social skills in children with and without developmental delays.发展迟缓儿童与非发展迟缓儿童的情绪话语、社会认知与社会技能。
Child Dev. 2011 Mar-Apr;82(2):717-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01569.x. Epub 2011 Mar 9.