Macones George A, Cahill Alison G, Stamilio David M, Odibo Anthony, Peipert Jeffrey, Stevens Erika J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;195(4):1148-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.042.
This study was undertaken to use multivariable methods to develop clinical predictive models for the occurrence of uterine rupture by using both antepartum and early intrapartum factors.
This was a planned secondary analysis from a multicenter case-control study of uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) delivery. Multivariable methods were used to develop 2 separate clinical predictive indices--one that used only prelabor factors and the other that used both prelabor and early labor factors. These indices were also assessed with the use of Receiver operating characteristic curves.
We identified 134 cases of uterine rupture and 665 noncases. No single individual factor is sufficiently sensitive or specific for clinical prediction of uterine rupture. Likewise, the 2 clinical predictive indices were neither sufficiently sensitive nor specific for clinical use (receiver operating characteristic curve [area under the curve] 0.67 and 0.70, respectively).
Uterine rupture cannot be predicted with either individual or combinations of clinical factors. This has important clinical and medical-legal implications.
本研究旨在采用多变量方法,通过产前和产程早期因素建立子宫破裂发生情况的临床预测模型。
这是一项对剖宫产术后尝试经阴道分娩(VBAC)的女性子宫破裂进行多中心病例对照研究的计划二次分析。采用多变量方法建立2个独立的临床预测指标——一个仅使用分娩前因素,另一个使用分娩前和分娩早期因素。还使用受试者工作特征曲线对这些指标进行评估。
我们确定了134例子宫破裂病例和665例非子宫破裂病例。没有单一的个体因素对子宫破裂的临床预测具有足够的敏感性或特异性。同样,这2个临床预测指标在临床应用中既没有足够的敏感性也没有足够的特异性(受试者工作特征曲线[曲线下面积]分别为0.67和0.70)。
无论是个体临床因素还是其组合都无法预测子宫破裂。这具有重要的临床和医疗法律意义。