• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
US men discussing prostate-specific antigen tests with a physician.美国男性与医生讨论前列腺特异性抗原检测。
Ann Fam Med. 2006 Sep-Oct;4(5):433-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.576.
2
National evidence on the use of shared decision making in prostate-specific antigen screening.国家关于在前列腺特异性抗原筛查中使用共同决策的证据。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;11(4):306-14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1539.
3
Physician-patient discussions with african american men about prostate cancer screening.医生与非裔美国男性关于前列腺癌筛查的讨论。
Am J Mens Health. 2008 Jun;2(2):156-64. doi: 10.1177/1557988307309323. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
4
Decision making in prostate-specific antigen screening National Health Interview Survey, 2000.2000年前列腺特异性抗原筛查中的决策制定——国家健康访谈调查
Am J Prev Med. 2006 May;30(5):394-404. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.12.006. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
5
Physician Consultations, Prostate Cancer Knowledge, and PSA Screening of African American Men in the Era of Shared Decision-Making.共同决策时代非裔美国男性的医生咨询、前列腺癌知识与前列腺特异性抗原筛查
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Jul;12(4):751-759. doi: 10.1177/1557988318763673. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
6
The effect of physician-patient discussions on the likelihood of prostate-specific antigen testing.医患讨论对前列腺特异性抗原检测可能性的影响。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2006 Nov;98(11):1823-9.
7
Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Initiation and Shared Decision-Making: Findings from the 2000 and 2015 National Health Interview Surveys.前列腺特异性抗原检测的启动和共享决策:来自 2000 年和 2015 年国家健康访谈调查的发现。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Jul-Aug;31(4):658-662. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.04.170448.
8
The PSA testing dilemma: GPs' reports of consultations with asymptomatic men: a qualitative study.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测的困境:全科医生关于与无症状男性会诊的报告:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Jun 25;8:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-35.
9
Physician-patient discussions about prostate-specific antigen test use among African-American men.医生与患者就非裔美国男性前列腺特异性抗原检测的使用情况进行的讨论。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2006 Apr;98(4):532-8.
10
Shared decision making in prostate-specific antigen testing with men older than 70 years.70 岁以上男性前列腺特异性抗原检测的共同决策。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;26(4):401-8. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.04.120267.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators of shared decision-making in prostate cancer screening in primary care: A systematic review.基层医疗中前列腺癌筛查共同决策的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Dec 12;37:102539. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102539. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
The Impact of Receipt of Information on Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing on Screening with the Prostate-Specific Antigen Test.接受信息对前列腺特异性抗原检测用于前列腺特异性抗原检测筛查的影响。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Aug;38(4):1313-1321. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02264-1. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
3
Prostate cancer screening decision-making in three states: 2013 behavioral risk factor surveillance system analysis.三个州的前列腺癌筛查决策:2013年行为危险因素监测系统分析
Cancer Causes Control. 2017 Mar;28(3):235-240. doi: 10.1007/s10552-017-0860-8. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
4
Discussions about prostate cancer screening between U.S. primary care physicians and their patients.美国初级保健医生及其患者之间关于前列腺癌筛查的讨论。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Oct;26(10):1098-104. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1682-0. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
5
Lack of follow-up of prostate-specific antigen test results.缺乏对前列腺特异性抗原检测结果的随访。
Public Health Rep. 2009 Sep-Oct;124(5):718-25. doi: 10.1177/003335490912400514.
6
Racial differences in trust and regular source of patient care and the implications for prostate cancer screening use.患者护理的信任度、常规来源方面的种族差异以及对前列腺癌筛查使用的影响。
Cancer. 2009 Nov 1;115(21):5048-59. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24539.

本文引用的文献

1
Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems.在社区和医疗保健系统中促进关于癌症筛查的明智决策。
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Jan;26(1):67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.012.
2
Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.关于筛查和化学预防的共同决策。美国预防服务工作组的建议方法。
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Jan;26(1):56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.011.
3
Informed consent for cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen: how well are men getting the message?关于前列腺特异性抗原癌症筛查的知情同意:男性对这一信息的了解程度如何?
Am J Public Health. 2003 May;93(5):779-85. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.5.779.
4
Screening for prostate cancer: an update of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.前列腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组证据更新
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Dec 3;137(11):917-29. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-11-200212030-00014.
5
Health decision aids to facilitate shared decision making in office practice.用于促进门诊实践中共同决策的健康决策辅助工具。
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jan 15;136(2):127-35. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-2-200201150-00010.
6
Cancer screening guidelines.癌症筛查指南。
Am Fam Physician. 2001 Mar 15;63(6):1101-12.
7
Facilitating participatory decision-making: what happens in real-world community practice?促进参与式决策:现实世界中的社区实践会发生什么?
Med Care. 2000 Dec;38(12):1200-9. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200012000-00007.
8
Physician-patient discussions of controversial cancer screening tests.医患之间关于有争议的癌症筛查检测的讨论。
Am J Prev Med. 2001 Feb;20(2):130-4. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00288-9.
9
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) best practice policy. American Urological Association (AUA).前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)最佳实践政策。美国泌尿外科学会(AUA)。
Oncology (Williston Park). 2000 Feb;14(2):267-72, 277-8, 280 passim.
10
American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer.美国癌症协会癌症早期检测指南。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2000 Jan-Feb;50(1):34-49. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.50.1.34.

美国男性与医生讨论前列腺特异性抗原检测。

US men discussing prostate-specific antigen tests with a physician.

作者信息

McFall Stephanie L

机构信息

University of Texas Health Science Center, School of Public Health, San Antonio, Tex 78229, USA.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2006 Sep-Oct;4(5):433-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.576.

DOI:10.1370/afm.576
PMID:17003144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1578645/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Informed decision making is recommended for prostate cancer screening. I wanted to examine demographic and screening-related factors associated with men's discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests with their physicians.

METHODS

I used data from 2,184 men aged 50 years and older who reported a screening prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test in the 2000 National Health Interview Survey cancer control supplement. The dependent variable was discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of the test before it was conducted.

RESULTS

Sixty-three percent of tested men reported a discussion in relation to their most recent PSA test. Discussion was more common for African American men and those with a usual source of care, and when the physician initiated the testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Characteristics of the patient-physician relationship were more central to the discussion of risks and benefits than were patient attributes. Future research should examine what role practice setting and the physician-patient relationship play in a discussion of PSA testing and how to facilitate active involvement of patients in decision making.

摘要

目的

推荐在前列腺癌筛查中进行知情决策。我想研究与男性和医生讨论前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测利弊相关的人口统计学及筛查相关因素。

方法

我使用了2000年国家健康访谈调查癌症控制补充调查中2184名50岁及以上男性的数据,这些男性报告进行了前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查检测。因变量是在检测前对检测利弊的讨论。

结果

63%接受检测的男性报告就其最近一次PSA检测进行了讨论。非洲裔美国男性以及有固定医疗服务来源的男性更常进行讨论,并且当医生发起检测时也是如此。

结论

医患关系的特征在风险和益处的讨论中比患者属性更为关键。未来的研究应考察医疗机构环境和医患关系在PSA检测讨论中所起的作用,以及如何促进患者积极参与决策。