• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经毒性作用的风险评估

Risk assessment for neurotoxic effects.

作者信息

Gaylor D W, Slikker W

机构信息

National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079.

出版信息

Neurotoxicology. 1990 Summer;11(2):211-8.

PMID:1700346
Abstract

Regulation of neurotoxicants is generally based on setting allowable doses (exposures) by dividing a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) by uncertainty factors that hopefully account for interspecies and intraspecies differences for extrapolations of experimental results obtained in animals to humans. This procedure makes no use of estimates of risk as a function of dose or does it acknowledge any risk at the NOAEL. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how bioassay data can be used to estimate the risk of neurotoxic effects as a function of dose. In the absence of direct measurements of neurotoxic effects, biomarkers associated with neurotoxic effects can be used as measures of toxicity. In the absence of a definition of an adverse effect, an abnormal level for a measure of toxicity can be established which occurs only in a small fraction of a population which is not exposed to the substance under investigation. Risk is defined as the proportion of a population whose levels of a measure of toxicity equal or exceeds the abnormal level of the measure under study. The procedure is illustrated using data for neurochemical, neurohistological, and behavioral effects of methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) administered to rats or monkeys. This procedure is more versatile than the NOAEL/uncertainty factor approach since it provides estimates of risk as a function of dose of a potential neurotoxic substance.

摘要

神经毒物的监管通常基于设定允许剂量(暴露量),即通过将未观察到有害作用水平(NOAEL)除以不确定系数来实现,这些系数有望考虑到种间和种内差异,以便将在动物身上获得的实验结果外推至人类。该程序未使用风险随剂量变化的估计值,也未承认在NOAEL水平存在任何风险。本文的目的是说明如何利用生物测定数据来估计神经毒性效应风险随剂量的变化情况。在无法直接测量神经毒性效应时,可将与神经毒性效应相关的生物标志物用作毒性指标。在缺乏有害作用定义的情况下,可确定一个毒性指标的异常水平,该水平仅在未接触所研究物质的一小部分人群中出现。风险定义为毒性指标水平等于或超过所研究指标异常水平的人群比例。本文使用给予大鼠或猴子的亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺(摇头丸,MDMA)的神经化学、神经组织学和行为效应数据来说明该程序。该程序比NOAEL/不确定系数方法更具通用性,因为它提供了潜在神经毒物风险随剂量变化的估计值。

相似文献

1
Risk assessment for neurotoxic effects.神经毒性作用的风险评估
Neurotoxicology. 1990 Summer;11(2):211-8.
2
3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine ("ecstasy") selectively destroys brain serotonin terminals in rhesus monkeys.3,4-亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺(“摇头丸”)可选择性地破坏恒河猴大脑中的血清素终端。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1989 Jun;249(3):713-20.
3
Neurochemical basis of neurotoxicity.神经毒性的神经化学基础。
Neurotoxicology. 1990 Summer;11(2):317-21.
4
Behavioral and neurochemical effects of orally administered MDMA in the rodent and nonhuman primate.口服摇头丸对啮齿动物和非人灵长类动物的行为及神经化学影响。
Neurotoxicology. 1989 Fall;10(3):529-42.
5
Caffeine promotes hyperthermia and serotonergic loss following co-administration of the substituted amphetamines, MDMA ("Ecstasy") and MDA ("Love").咖啡因与取代苯丙胺类药物摇头丸(MDMA,“摇头丸”)和甲烯二氧甲基苯丙胺(MDA,“爱情药”)共同给药后会促进体温过高和血清素丧失。
Neuropharmacology. 2006 Jan;50(1):69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.08.006. Epub 2005 Sep 26.
6
Lack of neurotoxicity after intra-raphe micro-injections of MDMA ("ecstasy").中缝内微量注射摇头丸(“摇头丸”)后无神经毒性。
NIDA Res Monogr. 1990;105:333-4.
7
Reinforcing subjective effects of (+/-) 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine ("ecstasy") may be separable from its neurotoxic actions: clinical evidence.(±)3,4-亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺(“摇头丸”)强化主观效应可能与其神经毒性作用可分离:临床证据。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1993 Jun;13(3):214-7.
8
3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine destroy serotonin terminals in rat brain: quantification of neurodegeneration by measurement of [3H]paroxetine-labeled serotonin uptake sites.3,4-亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺和3,4-亚甲基二氧苯丙胺破坏大鼠脑中的5-羟色胺终末:通过测量[3H]帕罗西汀标记的5-羟色胺摄取位点对神经变性进行定量分析。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987 Sep;242(3):911-6.
9
Modeling for risk assessment of neurotoxic effects.神经毒性效应风险评估建模
Risk Anal. 1994 Jun;14(3):333-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00249.x.
10
Studies of MDMA-induced neurotoxicity in nonhuman primates: a basis for evaluating long-term effects in humans.
NIDA Res Monogr. 1989;94:306-22.

引用本文的文献

1
Benchmark Dose of Urinary Cadmium for Assessing Renal Tubular and Glomerular Function in a Cadmium-Polluted Area of Japan.日本镉污染地区评估肾小管和肾小球功能的尿镉基准剂量
Toxics. 2024 Nov 21;12(12):836. doi: 10.3390/toxics12120836.
2
: an R package for benchmark dose estimation.用于基准剂量估计的R软件包。
PeerJ. 2020 Dec 17;8:e10557. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10557. eCollection 2020.
3
Bayesian Quantile Impairment Threshold Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Endpoints.贝叶斯分位数损伤阈值基准剂量估计用于连续终点。
Risk Anal. 2017 Nov;37(11):2107-2118. doi: 10.1111/risa.12762. Epub 2017 May 29.
4
Translational benchmark risk analysis.转化基准风险分析。
J Risk Res. 2010 Jul;13(5):653-667. doi: 10.1080/13669870903551662.
5
Simultaneous Confidence Bands for Abbott-Adjusted Quantal Response Models.雅培调整后的数量反应模型的同时置信带
Stat Methodol. 2008 May;5(3):209-219. doi: 10.1016/j.stamet.2007.08.001.
6
On use of the multistage dose-response model for assessing laboratory animal carcinogenicity.关于使用多阶段剂量反应模型评估实验动物致癌性
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007 Jul;48(2):135-47. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.03.002. Epub 2007 Mar 25.
7
Estimating risk from ambient concentrations of acrolein across the United States.根据美国各地丙烯醛的环境浓度估算风险。
Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Mar;115(3):410-5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9467. Epub 2006 Dec 11.
8
Benchmark dose for cadmium-induced renal effects in humans.镉对人体肾脏影响的基准剂量。
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Jul;114(7):1072-6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9028.
9
Benchmark calculations for perchlorate from three human cohorts.来自三个人类队列的高氯酸盐的基准计算。
Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Aug;113(8):1001-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7814.
10
Benchmark concentrations for methylmercury obtained from the Seychelles Child Development Study.从塞舌尔儿童发育研究中获得的甲基汞基准浓度。
Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Mar;108(3):257-63. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108257.