Suppr超能文献

短期阿奇霉素滴眼液与阿奇霉素单次口服治疗儿童沙眼的疗效及安全性:一项随机、对照、双盲临床试验

Efficacy and safety of short duration azithromycin eye drops versus azithromycin single oral dose for the treatment of trachoma in children: a randomised, controlled, double-masked clinical trial.

作者信息

Cochereau Isabelle, Goldschmidt Pablo, Goepogui André, Afghani Tayyab, Delval Laurent, Pouliquen Pascale, Bourcier Tristan, Robert Pierre-Yves

机构信息

Service d'Ophtalmologie, CHU d'Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49033 Angers, France.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 May;91(5):667-72. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.099275. Epub 2006 Sep 27.

Abstract

AIMS

Efficacy and safety of a short-duration treatment of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops versus oral azithromycin to treat active trachoma.

METHODS

Randomised, controlled, double-masked, double-dummy, non-inferiority explanatory study including 670 children from Guinea Conakry and Pakistan if: 1-10 years old; active trachoma (TF+TI0 or TF+TI+ on simplified World Health Organisation (WHO) scale). Three groups received either: azithromycin 1.5% eye drops twice daily for 2 days, for 3 days or azithromycin single 20 mg/kg oral dose. Patients' contacts were treated whenever possible. Clinical evaluation was performed using a binocular loupe. Primary efficacy variable was the cure (no active trachoma (TF0)) at day 60. Non-inferiority margin for difference between cure rates was 10%.

RESULTS

Cure rate in per protocol set was as follows: 93.0%, 96.3% and 96.6% in 2-day group 3-day group, and oral treatment group, respectively. Azithromycin 1.5% groups were non-inferior to oral azithromycin. The intend to treat (ITT) analysis supported the results. Clinical re-emergence rate was low: 4.2%. Ocular tolerance was similar for all groups. No treatment related adverse events were reported. Logistic regression analyses found prognostic factors such as: country (p<0.001) and trachoma severity (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

In active trachoma, azithromycin eye drops twice daily for 2 or 3 days are as efficient as the WHO's reference treatment and represent an innovative alternative to oral azithromycin.

摘要

目的

比较1.5%阿奇霉素滴眼液短期治疗与口服阿奇霉素治疗活动性沙眼的疗效和安全性。

方法

随机、对照、双盲、双模拟、非劣效性解释性研究,纳入来自几内亚科纳克里和巴基斯坦的670名儿童,条件为:年龄1至10岁;患有活动性沙眼(根据简化的世界卫生组织(WHO)标准为TF+TI0或TF+TI+)。三组分别接受:1.5%阿奇霉素滴眼液,每日两次,共2天、3天,或单次口服20mg/kg阿奇霉素。尽可能对患者的接触者进行治疗。使用双目放大镜进行临床评估。主要疗效变量为第60天时的治愈情况(无活动性沙眼(TF0))。治愈率差异的非劣效性界值为10%。

结果

符合方案集的治愈率如下:2天治疗组为93.0%,3天治疗组为96.3%,口服治疗组为96.6%。1.5%阿奇霉素组不劣于口服阿奇霉素组。意向性分析(ITT)支持该结果。临床复发率较低:4.2%。所有组的眼部耐受性相似。未报告与治疗相关的不良事件。逻辑回归分析发现了一些预后因素,如:国家(p<0.001)和沙眼严重程度(p = 0.003)。

结论

在活动性沙眼治疗中,1.5%阿奇霉素滴眼液每日两次,使用2天或3天,与WHO的参考治疗同样有效,是口服阿奇霉素的一种创新替代方案。

相似文献

3
Efficacy and safety of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops for purulent bacterial conjunctivitis in pediatric patients.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010 Mar;29(3):222-6. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181b99fa2.
4
Clinical cure of bacterial conjunctivitis with azithromycin 1%: vehicle-controlled, double-masked clinical trial.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jun;145(6):959-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.01.019. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
6
9
Longitudinal evaluation of three azithromycin distribution strategies for treatment of trachoma in a sub-Saharan African country, Mali.
Acta Trop. 2007 Jan;101(1):40-53. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2006.12.003. Epub 2006 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

2
Effectiveness and safety of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops for mass treatment of active trachoma in a highly endemic district in Cameroon.
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov 1;5(1):e000531. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000531. eCollection 2020.
3
Prevalence of trachoma and associated factors in the rural area of the department of Vaupés, Colombia.
PLoS One. 2020 May 19;15(5):e0229297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229297. eCollection 2020.
4
Antibiotics for trachoma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 26;9(9):CD001860. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001860.pub4.
5
Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infection: elimination with mass drug administration.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2019 Mar;17(3):189-200. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2019.1577136. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
8
The limits of medical interventions for the elimination of preventable blindness.
Trop Med Health. 2014 Mar;42(1):43-52. doi: 10.2149/tmh.2013-26. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
9
Efficacy and safety of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops in paediatric population with purulent bacterial conjunctivitis.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;98(6):739-45. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303888. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
10
A European perspective on topical ophthalmic antibiotics: current and evolving options.
Ophthalmol Eye Dis. 2011 Oct 24;3:29-43. doi: 10.4137/OED.S4866. Print 2011.

本文引用的文献

1
Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002.
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Nov;82(11):844-51. Epub 2004 Dec 14.
3
Mass treatment with single-dose azithromycin for trachoma.
N Engl J Med. 2004 Nov 4;351(19):1962-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040979.
4
Mass antibiotic treatment and community protection in trachoma control programs.
Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Nov 1;39(9):e95-7. doi: 10.1086/424747. Epub 2004 Oct 6.
5
Face washing promotion for preventing active trachoma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD003659. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003659.pub2.
8
The United States Food and Drug Administration and the end of antibiotics.
Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Feb 1;34(3):420-2. doi: 10.1086/338976.
9
Socioeconomic status and blindness.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Dec;85(12):1484-8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.12.1484.
10
Blinding trachoma: the forgotten problem.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Dec;85(12):1397-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.12.1397.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验