Knight David C, Nguyen Hanh T, Bandettini Peter A
Section on Functional Imaging Methods, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2006 Jun;6(2):157-62. doi: 10.3758/cabn.6.2.157.
Expression of conditional fear without awareness has been previously demonstrated during delay conditioning, a procedure in which the conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (UCS) overlap. However, less is known about the role of awareness in trace fear conditioning, where an interval of time separates the CS and UCS. The present study assessed skin conductance response (SCR) and UCS expectancy during delay and trace conditioning. UCS predictability was varied on a trial-by-trial basis by presenting perithreshold auditory CSs. Differential UCS expectancies were demonstrated only on perceived delay and trace trials. Learning-related SCRs were observed during both perceived and unperceived delay CSs. In contrast, differential SCRs were demonstrated only for perceived trace CSs. These data suggest that awareness is necessary for conditional responding during trace, but not delay, fear conditioning.
在延迟条件反射(一种条件刺激(CS)和无条件刺激(UCS)重叠的程序)过程中,先前已证明有无意识的条件性恐惧表达。然而,关于意识在痕迹恐惧条件反射中的作用所知较少,在痕迹恐惧条件反射中,CS和UCS之间有一段时间间隔。本研究评估了延迟和痕迹条件反射过程中的皮肤电反应(SCR)和UCS预期。通过呈现阈下听觉CS,在逐个试验的基础上改变UCS的可预测性。仅在感知到的延迟和痕迹试验中表现出不同的UCS预期。在感知到的和未感知到的延迟CS期间均观察到与学习相关的SCR。相比之下,仅对感知到的痕迹CS表现出不同的SCR。这些数据表明,在痕迹恐惧条件反射而非延迟恐惧条件反射中,意识对于条件反应是必要的。