Bräscher Anne-Kathrin, Kleinböhl Dieter, Hölzl Rupert, Becker Susanne
Otto-Selz-Institute of Applied Psychology, Mannheim Centre for Work and Health, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Department for Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy, and Experimental Psychopathology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 13;8:2163. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02163. eCollection 2017.
Nocebo effects, including nocebo hyperalgesia, are a common phenomenon in clinical routine with manifold negative consequences. Both explicit expectations and learning by conditioning are known to induce nocebo effects, but the specific role of conditioning remains unclear, because conditioning is rarely implemented independent of verbal suggestions. Further, although pain is a multidimensional phenomenon, nocebo effects are usually assessed in subjective ratings only, neglecting, e.g., behavioral aspects. The aim of this study was to test whether nocebo hyperalgesia can be learned by conditioning without explicit expectations, to assess nocebo effects in different response channels, and to exploratively assess, whether contingency awareness is a necessary condition for conditioned nocebo hyperalgesia. Twenty-one healthy volunteers were classically conditioned using painful and non-painful heat stimuli that followed two different cues. The conditioned nocebo effect was assessed by subjective ratings of perceived stimulation intensity on a visual analog scale and a behavioral discrimination task, assessing sensitization and habituation in response to the same stimulation following the two cues. Results show a conditioned nocebo effect indicated by the subjective intensity ratings. Conditioned effects were also seen in the behavioral responses, but paradoxically, behavioral responses indicated decreased perception after conditioning, but only for subjects successfully conditioned as indicated by the subjective ratings. Explorative analyses suggested that awareness of the contingencies and the different cues was not necessary for successful conditioning. Nocebo effects can be learned without inducing additional explicit expectations. The dissociation between the two response channels, possibly representing the conditioned and a compensatory response, highlights the importance of considering different outcomes in nocebo responses to fully understand underlying mechanisms. The present results challenge the role of explicit expectations in conditioned nocebo effects and are relevant with implications in clinical contexts, e.g., when transient adverse effects become conditioned.
包括安慰剂性痛觉过敏在内的反安慰剂效应是临床实践中常见的现象,会产生多种负面后果。已知明确预期和条件作用学习都会引发反安慰剂效应,但条件作用的具体作用仍不明确,因为条件作用很少独立于言语暗示实施。此外,尽管疼痛是一个多维度现象,但反安慰剂效应通常仅通过主观评分来评估,而忽略了行为方面等因素。本研究的目的是测试反安慰剂性痛觉过敏是否可以在没有明确预期的情况下通过条件作用习得,评估不同反应通道中的反安慰剂效应,并探索性地评估意外事件意识是否是条件性反安慰剂性痛觉过敏的必要条件。21名健康志愿者接受了经典条件作用,使用了跟随两种不同线索的疼痛和非疼痛热刺激。通过视觉模拟量表上对感知刺激强度的主观评分以及行为辨别任务来评估条件性反安慰剂效应,该任务评估在两种线索后对相同刺激的反应中的敏化和习惯化。结果显示,主观强度评分表明存在条件性反安慰剂效应。行为反应中也出现了条件性效应,但矛盾的是,行为反应表明条件作用后感知下降,但仅针对主观评分显示成功进行条件作用的受试者。探索性分析表明,对意外事件和不同线索的意识并非成功进行条件作用的必要条件。反安慰剂效应可以在不引发额外明确预期的情况下习得。两个反应通道之间的分离,可能代表了条件性反应和补偿性反应,凸显了在反安慰剂反应中考虑不同结果以充分理解潜在机制的重要性。本研究结果对明确预期在条件性反安慰剂效应中的作用提出了挑战,并且在临床背景下具有相关性,例如当短暂的不良反应形成条件时。