Suppr超能文献

谈论过去经历的各个部分:讨论方式和事件结构对已讨论和未讨论信息记忆的影响。

Talking about parts of a past experience: The impact of discussion style and event structure on memory for discussed and nondiscussed information.

作者信息

Conroy Rowena, Salmon Karen

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Dec;95(4):278-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Sep 27.

Abstract

This experiment examined the impact of selective postevent discussion of high- and low-elaborative styles on 5- and 6-year-olds' (N = 47) memory for discussed and nondiscussed aspects of a staged event ("Visiting the Pirate"). The event contained both logically and arbitrarily connected scenes. Discussion was spaced over 3 days, and memory was assessed 1 day later. Compared with a no-discussion condition, memory for discussed information was enhanced after high- but not low-elaborative discussion for both logically and arbitrarily connected scenes. For arbitrarily connected scenes, memory for nondiscussed aspects was impaired relative to the no-discussion condition, with the degree of impairment being equal after high- and low-elaborative discussion. In contrast, for logically connected scenes, memory for nondiscussed information was not impaired after discussion of either style.

摘要

本实验考察了对5至6岁儿童(N = 47)进行高详略度和低详略度的选择性事后讨论,对他们关于一个 staged 事件(“参观海盗”)中已讨论和未讨论方面的记忆的影响。该事件包含逻辑关联和任意关联的场景。讨论分3天进行,1天后评估记忆。与不讨论的情况相比,对于逻辑关联和任意关联的场景,高详略度讨论后对已讨论信息的记忆增强,而低详略度讨论后则不然。对于任意关联的场景,相对于不讨论的情况,对未讨论方面的记忆受损,高详略度和低详略度讨论后的受损程度相同。相比之下,对于逻辑关联的场景,两种详略度讨论后对未讨论信息的记忆均未受损。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验