Conroy Rowena, Salmon Karen
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Dec;95(4):278-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
This experiment examined the impact of selective postevent discussion of high- and low-elaborative styles on 5- and 6-year-olds' (N = 47) memory for discussed and nondiscussed aspects of a staged event ("Visiting the Pirate"). The event contained both logically and arbitrarily connected scenes. Discussion was spaced over 3 days, and memory was assessed 1 day later. Compared with a no-discussion condition, memory for discussed information was enhanced after high- but not low-elaborative discussion for both logically and arbitrarily connected scenes. For arbitrarily connected scenes, memory for nondiscussed aspects was impaired relative to the no-discussion condition, with the degree of impairment being equal after high- and low-elaborative discussion. In contrast, for logically connected scenes, memory for nondiscussed information was not impaired after discussion of either style.
本实验考察了对5至6岁儿童(N = 47)进行高详略度和低详略度的选择性事后讨论,对他们关于一个 staged 事件(“参观海盗”)中已讨论和未讨论方面的记忆的影响。该事件包含逻辑关联和任意关联的场景。讨论分3天进行,1天后评估记忆。与不讨论的情况相比,对于逻辑关联和任意关联的场景,高详略度讨论后对已讨论信息的记忆增强,而低详略度讨论后则不然。对于任意关联的场景,相对于不讨论的情况,对未讨论方面的记忆受损,高详略度和低详略度讨论后的受损程度相同。相比之下,对于逻辑关联的场景,两种详略度讨论后对未讨论信息的记忆均未受损。