Bauer P J, Wenner J A, Dropik P L, Wewerka S S
Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2000;65(4):i-vi, 1-204.
The ability to recall is something that most intact adults take for granted. For much of the last century, this feature of mental life was not considered to extend to very young children. There now is evidence that 1- to 2-year-olds are able to recall specific events after delays of several months. Over the short term, 1- to 2-year-olds' recall is affected by the same factors that affect older children's recall; it is not clear whether similar effects are apparent over the long term. Moreover, although age-related increases in long-term recall are assumed, there have been few empirical tests of the question. We examined recall by 14- to 32-month-olds for events experienced at 13 to 20 months. Using elicited imitation of novel multistep event sequences we examined effects of (a) delay length, (b) age at the time of experience, (c) temporal structure of events, (d) mode of experience of events, and (e) availability of verbal reminders, on long-term recall. Participants were 360 children enrolled at 13 (n = 90), 16 (n = 180), and 20 (n = 90) months. All of the 13-month-olds and half of the 16-month-olds were tested on 3-step event sequences; all of the 20-month-olds and half of the 16-month-olds were tested on 4-step event sequences. Within each age and step-length group, equal numbers of children were tested after intervals of 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (n = 18 per cell). Children were tested on a variety of sequence types. For half of the events, imitation was permitted prior to the delay; for the other half, children were not permitted imitation. At delayed testing, children experienced a recall period during which they were cued by the event-related props alone, followed by a period in which recall was cued both by the event-related props and by verbal labels for the event sequences. Within step-length groups, the length of time for which older and younger children showed evidence of memory did not differ. Nevertheless, when the children were prompted by the event-related props alone, there were age-related differences in the robustness of children's memories (as indexed by higher levels of recall for older children relative to younger children). When the children were prompted by the props and by verbal labels for the event sequences, at the longer retention intervals, there were age-related differences in the robustness of children's memories and in the reliability with which recall was evidenced (as indexed by the larger numbers of older children evincing recall). Age-related effects were particularly apparent on children's ordered recall. Across the entire age range, the children were similarly affected by the variables of sequence type, opportunity for imitation, and verbal reminding.
回忆能力是大多数心智健全的成年人认为理所当然的事情。在上个世纪的大部分时间里,人们认为这种心理生活特征并不适用于非常年幼的儿童。现在有证据表明,1到2岁的儿童在几个月的延迟后能够回忆起特定事件。短期内,1到2岁儿童的回忆受到影响较大儿童回忆的相同因素的影响;长期来看,类似的影响是否明显尚不清楚。此外,尽管人们认为长期回忆会随着年龄增长而提高,但对此问题几乎没有实证检验。我们研究了14到32个月大的儿童对13到20个月时经历的事件的回忆。通过引发对新颖多步骤事件序列的模仿,我们研究了(a)延迟长度、(b)经历事件时的年龄、(c)事件的时间结构、(d)事件的经历方式以及(e)言语提示的可用性对长期回忆的影响。参与者是360名分别在13个月(n = 90)、16个月(n = 180)和20个月(n = 90)入学的儿童。所有13个月大的儿童和一半16个月大的儿童接受了3步事件序列的测试;所有20个月大的儿童和一半16个月大的儿童接受了4步事件序列的测试。在每个年龄和步长组中,相等数量的儿童在1、3、6、9和12个月的间隔后接受测试(每个单元格n = 18)。儿童接受了各种序列类型的测试。对于一半的事件,在延迟前允许模仿;对于另一半事件,不允许儿童模仿。在延迟测试中,儿童经历一个回忆期,在此期间他们仅由与事件相关的道具提示,随后是一个回忆期,在此期间回忆由与事件相关的道具和事件序列的言语标签共同提示。在步长组内,年长和年幼儿童表现出记忆证据的时间长度没有差异。然而,当仅由与事件相关的道具提示儿童时,儿童记忆的稳健性存在年龄差异(以年长儿童相对于年幼儿童更高的回忆水平为指标)。当由道具和事件序列的言语标签提示儿童时,在较长的保留间隔下,儿童记忆的稳健性以及回忆证据的可靠性存在年龄差异(以表现出回忆的年长儿童数量更多为指标)。年龄相关效应在儿童的有序回忆中尤为明显。在整个年龄范围内,儿童受到序列类型、模仿机会和言语提醒等变量的影响类似。