Hirsh Irina, Vaissler Alexander, Chernin Josef, Segol Ori, Pizov Reuven
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, and The B. & R. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion--Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Dig Dis Sci. 2006 Nov;51(11):1946-51. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-9413-9. Epub 2006 Sep 29.
The present study determined the acceptability of colonoscopy in outpatients treated with tramadol or fentanyl for analgesia and sedation. One hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned to receive midazolam, 0.05 mg/kg, and fentanyl, 2 microg/kg, intravenously (group 1), midazolam, 0.05 mg/kg, and tramadol, 1 mg/kg, per os (group 2), or midazolam, 0.05 mg/kg, and tramadol, 2 mg/kg, per os (group 3). Pain severity, level of sedation, cardiorespiratory parameters, and procedure-related side effects and complications were registered and analyzed. No significant cardiorespiratory disturbances were observed. Sedation level during the procedure was similar in all groups. Pain severity values measured during the procedure was significantly higher in groups 2 and 3 than in group 1 (P < 0.001). Both hospital and home adverse events occurred more frequently in groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (P < 0.03). The patients receiving fentanyl-based analgesia tolerated colonoscopy better than patients treated with tramadol.
本研究确定了在接受曲马多或芬太尼镇痛镇静治疗的门诊患者中结肠镜检查的可接受性。150例患者被随机分为三组:静脉注射咪达唑仑0.05mg/kg和芬太尼2μg/kg(第1组);口服咪达唑仑0.05mg/kg和曲马多1mg/kg(第2组);口服咪达唑仑0.05mg/kg和曲马多2mg/kg(第3组)。记录并分析疼痛严重程度、镇静水平、心肺参数以及与操作相关的副作用和并发症。未观察到明显的心肺功能紊乱。所有组在操作过程中的镇静水平相似。第2组和第3组在操作过程中测得的疼痛严重程度值显著高于第1组(P<0.001)。与第1组相比,第2组和第3组在医院和家中发生不良事件的频率更高(P<0.03)。接受芬太尼镇痛的患者比接受曲马多治疗的患者对结肠镜检查的耐受性更好。