• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版病理性赌博诊断标准的心理测量评估

A psychometric evaluation of the DSM-IV pathological gambling diagnostic criteria.

作者信息

Zimmerman Mark, Chelminski Iwona, Young Diane

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2006 Fall;22(3):329-37. doi: 10.1007/s10899-006-9020-x.

DOI:10.1007/s10899-006-9020-x
PMID:17009124
Abstract

Specific diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling (PG) have been available for 25 years, since the publication of DSM-III. Little research has examined the psychometric performance of the diagnostic criteria. The goal of the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project was to examine the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the DSM-IV PG criteria for psychiatric outpatients who screened positive for a gambling problem. A total of 1709 psychiatric outpatients were evaluated with a semistructured diagnostic interview for PG. Of all patients 88 screened positive for PG, 40 of whom met DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for a lifetime history of PG. All ten DSM-IV criteria were significantly more frequent in the PG group. The sensitivity of the criteria ranged from 25.0% to 90.0% (mean = 67.8%), whereas specificity ranged from 62.5% to 100% (mean = 81.9%). Positive predictive values ranged from 64.1% to 100% (mean = 78.9%), and negative predictive values ranged from 61.5% to 90.7% (mean = 77.1%). Guidelines are recommended for determining whether a diagnostic criterion should be retained as part of the set of diagnostic criteria, and our results suggested that two of the DSM-IV PG criteria are candidates for elimination (criterion 8--commitment of illegal acts; criterion 10--reliance on others for financial assistance to relieve a desperate financial problem).

摘要

自《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)出版以来,病理性赌博(PG)的特定诊断标准已存在25年。很少有研究检验这些诊断标准的心理测量性能。本报告来自罗德岛改善诊断评估与服务方法(MIDAS)项目,其目标是检验DSM - IV中PG标准对于筛查出有赌博问题的精神科门诊患者的敏感性、特异性和预测价值。共有1709名精神科门诊患者接受了关于PG的半结构化诊断访谈。在所有患者中,88人筛查出PG呈阳性,其中40人符合DSM - IV关于PG终身病史的诊断标准。PG组中所有十条DSM - IV标准出现的频率都显著更高。这些标准的敏感性范围为25.0%至90.0%(平均 = 67.8%),而特异性范围为62.5%至100%(平均 = 81.9%)。阳性预测值范围为64.1%至100%(平均 = 78.9%),阴性预测值范围为61.5%至90.7%(平均 = 77.1%)。建议制定指导方针来确定一条诊断标准是否应作为诊断标准集的一部分保留,我们的结果表明DSM - IV中两条PG标准有被剔除的可能(标准8——实施非法行为;标准10——依靠他人提供经济援助以缓解极度的财务问题)。

相似文献

1
A psychometric evaluation of the DSM-IV pathological gambling diagnostic criteria.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版病理性赌博诊断标准的心理测量评估
J Gambl Stud. 2006 Fall;22(3):329-37. doi: 10.1007/s10899-006-9020-x.
2
Prevalence and diagnostic correlates of DSM-IV pathological gambling in psychiatric outpatients.精神科门诊患者中 DSM-IV 病理性赌博的流行情况及诊断相关性。
J Gambl Stud. 2006 Jun;22(2):255-62. doi: 10.1007/s10899-006-9014-8. Epub 2006 Jul 1.
3
Diagnosing major depressive disorder VI: performance of an objective test as a diagnostic criterion.重度抑郁症的诊断VI:客观测试作为诊断标准的性能
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006 Aug;194(8):565-9. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000230393.19478.d5.
4
Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of a Spanish translation of a measure of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling.一种用于病理性赌博的DSM-IV诊断标准测量工具西班牙语翻译版本的信度、效度及分类准确性
J Gambl Stud. 2009 Mar;25(1):93-104. doi: 10.1007/s10899-008-9104-x. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
5
DSM-IV pathological gambling in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.《美国国立共病调查复制版》中的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》病理性赌博
Psychol Med. 2008 Sep;38(9):1351-60. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708002900. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
6
On the threshold of disorder: a study of the impact of the DSM-IV clinical significance criterion on diagnosing depressive and anxiety disorders in clinical practice.处于疾病临界状态:一项关于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版临床意义标准对临床实践中抑郁和焦虑症诊断影响的研究
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;65(10):1400-5.
7
Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of a measure of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling.DSM-IV病理性赌博诊断标准测量方法的信度、效度及分类准确性
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;160(1):180-2. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.180.
8
Reliability, Validity, and Classification Accuracy of the DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Gambling Disorder and Comparison to DSM-IV.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中赌博障碍诊断标准的信度、效度和分类准确性及其与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)的比较
J Gambl Stud. 2016 Sep;32(3):905-22. doi: 10.1007/s10899-015-9573-7.
9
The relationship of DSM-IV pathological gambling to compulsive buying and other possible spectrum disorders: results from the Iowa PG family study.DSM-IV 病理性赌博与强迫性购买和其他可能的谱系障碍的关系:爱荷华 PG 家族研究的结果。
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Mar 30;226(1):273-6. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.12.061. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
10
Natural recovery and treatment-seeking in pathological gambling: results of two U.S. national surveys.病态赌博中的自然康复与寻求治疗:两项美国全国性调查的结果
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;163(2):297-302. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.2.297.

引用本文的文献

1
Network analysis of DSM-5 criteria for gambling disorder: considering sex differences in a large clinical sample.DSM-5 赌博障碍诊断标准的网络分析:在大临床样本中考虑性别差异。
Eur Psychiatry. 2024 May 6;67(1):e65. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.22.
2
Discounting Behavior in Problem Gambling.赌博问题中的折扣行为。
J Gambl Stud. 2022 Jun;38(2):529-543. doi: 10.1007/s10899-021-10054-x. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
3
A Comparison of DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Gambling Disorder in a Large Clinical Sample.大型临床样本中《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版(DSM-IV-TR)与第五版(DSM-5)赌博障碍诊断标准的比较

本文引用的文献

1
Pathological gambling: A review of the literature (prepared for the American Psychiatric Association task force on DSM-IV committee on disorders of impulse control not elsewhere classified).病理性赌博:文献综述(为美国精神病学协会 DSM-IV 工作组冲动控制障碍分类委员会编写)。
J Gambl Stud. 1991 Mar;7(1):5-39. doi: 10.1007/BF01019763.
2
A hierarchy of gambling disorders in the community.社区中赌博障碍的分级体系。
Addiction. 2003 Dec;98(12):1661-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00545.x.
3
DSM-IV and the South Oaks Gambling Screen: diagnosing and assessing pathological gambling in Turkey.
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 26;10:931. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00931. eCollection 2019.
4
Effects of Gambling Diagnostic Criteria Changes from DSM-IV to DSM-5 on Mental Disorder Comorbidity Across Younger, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults in a Nationally Representative Sample.DSM-4 到 DSM-5 赌博诊断标准变化对全国代表性样本中年轻、中年和老年成年人精神障碍共病的影响。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Mar;35(1):307-320. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9801-z.
5
Problem gambling and substance use in patients attending community mental health services.社区精神卫生服务患者中的问题赌博与物质使用情况
J Behav Addict. 2017 Dec 1;6(4):678-688. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.077. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
6
Gambling Disorder in the DSM-5: Opportunities to Improve Diagnosis and Treatment Especially in Substance Use and Homeless Populations.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中的赌博障碍:改善诊断与治疗的契机,尤其是针对物质使用人群和无家可归者群体
Curr Addict Rep. 2016 Sep;3(3):249-253. doi: 10.1007/s40429-016-0112-0. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
7
Clinical and Research Implications of Gambling Disorder in DSM-5.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中赌博障碍的临床及研究意义
Curr Addict Rep. 2014 Sep 1;1(3):159-165. doi: 10.1007/s40429-014-0026-7. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
8
Reliability, Validity, and Classification Accuracy of the DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Gambling Disorder and Comparison to DSM-IV.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中赌博障碍诊断标准的信度、效度和分类准确性及其与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)的比较
J Gambl Stud. 2016 Sep;32(3):905-22. doi: 10.1007/s10899-015-9573-7.
9
Endorsement of Criminal Behavior Amongst Offenders: Implications for DSM-5 Gambling Disorder.罪犯中犯罪行为的认可:对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中赌博障碍的影响。
J Gambl Stud. 2016 Mar;32(1):35-45. doi: 10.1007/s10899-015-9540-3.
10
Update on the Pharmacological Treatment of Pathological Gambling.病理性赌博的药物治疗进展
Curr Psychopharmacol. 2013;2(3):204-211. doi: 10.2174/22115560113029990008.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版与南橡树赌博筛查量表:土耳其病理性赌博的诊断与评估
J Gambl Stud. 1997 Autumn;13(3):193-206. doi: 10.1023/a:1024927115449.
4
Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research.精神科研究中使用的诊断标准。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1972 Jan;26(1):57-63. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1972.01750190059011.