Barbieri P G, Silvestri S, Veraldi Angela, Festa R, Martello F, Garattini Siria
Servizio Prevenzione e Sicurezza Ambienti di Lavoro, ASL Brescia.
Med Lav. 2006 Jan-Feb;97(1):51-7.
Cases of malignant mesothelioma (MM) in the non-asbestos textile industry have recently been described, but asbestos exposure in spinning and looming has seldom been reported. Nevertheless, on a national level the Italian Mesothelioma Registry (Re.Na.M) contains numerous cases of MM with past non-asbestos textile work but classified as "unknown" exposure due to poor information.
The aim of this research was to investigate possible past occupational exposure to asbestos in this specific industrial sector.
The MM cases were collected from the Mesothelioma Registry of Brescia. Work histories were obtained via a standardized questionnaire. Investigations were conducted in textile machinery manufacturing plants in order to collect information regarding the possible use of asbestos parts; at the same time, the use of asbestos friction materials and the use of sprayed asbestos for noise abatement purposes or thermal insulation was checked in the cotton industry by interviewing the management of two companies where a cluster of MM was observed.
The Mesothelioma Registry of Brescia retrieved and collected 15 MM cases with past work in the cotton spinning industry, 4 of them employed in the same company. Further search of asbestos use gave positive results as the use of friction materials has been widespread since the fifties, while sprayed asbestos was not found anywhere in the cotton industry. On the other hand, half of the cases were employed during the thirties and forties, when friction materials appear to have been asbestos-free. Therefore the other hypothesis of exposure could be direct manufacture of asbestos yarn.
The results of this investigation indicate the attribution, at least, of possible asbestos exposure"for those cases employed in textile industries since the fifties, according to the Re.Na.M guidelines; for those cases employed before that period the same classification can be attributed on an epidemiological basis. Previous work periods need further investigation in order to demonstrate the circumstances of the occupational asbestos exposure, given the heterogeneity of work processes and machinery characteristic of this industrial sector.
近期已有关于非石棉纺织行业恶性间皮瘤(MM)病例的报道,但纺纱和织造过程中的石棉暴露情况鲜有报告。然而,在国家层面上,意大利间皮瘤登记处(Re.Na.M)记录了众多曾从事非石棉纺织工作但因信息不足而被归类为“不明”暴露的MM病例。
本研究旨在调查该特定工业部门过去可能存在的石棉职业暴露情况。
从布雷西亚间皮瘤登记处收集MM病例。通过标准化问卷获取工作经历。对纺织机械制造工厂进行调查,以收集有关可能使用石棉部件的信息;与此同时,通过采访两家观察到MM聚集现象的公司的管理层,核查棉花行业中石棉摩擦材料的使用情况以及用于降噪或隔热的喷涂石棉的使用情况。
布雷西亚间皮瘤登记处检索并收集了15例曾在棉纺行业工作的MM病例,其中4例受雇于同一家公司。进一步搜索石棉使用情况得到了阳性结果,因为自五十年代以来摩擦材料的使用很普遍,而在棉花行业任何地方都未发现喷涂石棉。另一方面,一半的病例受雇于三十年代和四十年代,当时摩擦材料似乎不含石棉。因此,另一种暴露假设可能是石棉纱线的直接制造。
本调查结果表明,根据Re.Na.M指南,至少对于五十年代以来受雇于纺织行业的那些病例,可归因于可能的石棉暴露;对于在此之前受雇的那些病例,可在流行病学基础上进行相同的归类。鉴于该工业部门工作流程和机械特性的异质性,需要进一步调查以前的工作时期,以证明职业性石棉暴露的情况。