• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项家庭式学前阅读干预计划中的治疗完整性

Treatment integrity in a home-based pre-reading intervention programme.

作者信息

van Otterloo Sandra G, van der Leij Aryan, Veldkamp Esther

机构信息

Department of Education, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Dyslexia. 2006 Aug;12(3):155-76. doi: 10.1002/dys.311.

DOI:10.1002/dys.311
PMID:17009767
Abstract

Treatment integrity is an underexposed issue in the phonological awareness intervention research. The current study assessed the integrity of treatment of the families (N = 32) participating in the experimental condition of a home-based pre-reading intervention study. The participating kindergartners were all genetically at risk for developing dyslexia. Two aspects of treatment integrity, the number of lessons completed (quantity) and the quality of the administration of the programme (observed in a videotaped session), were investigated. The level of treatment integrity turned out to be 66% when completion of all lessons was taken as quantitative criterion, and about 74% when quality of the parent-child interaction was assessed. The two measures could predict the pre-reading skills at the end of kindergarten. Together they accounted for 43% of the variance in this dependent variable. Together with pre-reading scores at the pre-test the total predicted variance was 87%. The number of lessons completed still contributed 12% to the prediction after controlling for pre-test scores. The results indicated that treatment integrity indeed appears to be an important aspect of treatment outcome and should therefore be included in intervention studies.

摘要

治疗完整性是语音意识干预研究中一个未被充分探讨的问题。本研究评估了参与一项基于家庭的学前阅读干预研究实验条件的家庭(N = 32)的治疗完整性。参与研究的幼儿园儿童均有患诵读困难症的遗传风险。研究调查了治疗完整性的两个方面,即完成的课程数量(数量)和项目实施的质量(通过录像课程观察)。以完成所有课程作为定量标准时,治疗完整性水平为66%,而评估亲子互动质量时,该水平约为74%。这两项指标可以预测幼儿园末期的学前阅读技能。它们共同解释了该因变量43%的方差。与学前测试的阅读前分数一起,总预测方差为87%。在控制学前测试分数后,完成的课程数量仍对预测贡献了12%。结果表明,治疗完整性确实似乎是治疗结果的一个重要方面,因此应纳入干预研究。

相似文献

1
Treatment integrity in a home-based pre-reading intervention programme.一项家庭式学前阅读干预计划中的治疗完整性
Dyslexia. 2006 Aug;12(3):155-76. doi: 10.1002/dys.311.
2
Improving early language and literacy skills: differential effects of an oral language versus a phonology with reading intervention.提高早期语言和读写能力:口语与语音阅读干预的不同效果。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;49(4):422-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01849.x. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
3
[Phonological remediation program in students with developmental dyslexia].[发育性阅读障碍学生的语音矫正计划]
Pro Fono. 2008 Jan-Mar;20(1):31-6. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872008000100006.
4
Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin: first-grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention.将阅读干预作为预防接种或胰岛素:对幼儿园干预有强烈反应者的一年级阅读表现
J Learn Disabil. 2004 Mar-Apr;37(2):90-104. doi: 10.1177/00222194040370020101.
5
Early identification and remediation of phonological-processing deficits in first-grade children at risk for reading disabilities.
J Learn Disabil. 1994 Dec;27(10):647-59. doi: 10.1177/002221949402701005.
6
Predicting response to early reading intervention from verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities, attention ratings, and verbal IQ-word reading discrepancy: failure to validate discrepancy method.从言语智商、阅读相关语言能力、注意力评分以及言语智商与单词阅读差异预测早期阅读干预的反应:差异方法验证失败。
J Learn Disabil. 2003 Jan-Feb;36(1):24-33. doi: 10.1177/00222194030360010401.
7
Dyslexia: a new synergy between education and cognitive neuroscience.诵读困难症:教育与认知神经科学之间的一种新协同作用。
Science. 2009 Jul 17;325(5938):280-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1171999.
8
Efficacy of small group reading intervention for beginning readers with reading-delay: a randomised controlled trial.针对阅读延迟的初学者的小组阅读干预效果:一项随机对照试验。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;47(8):820-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01559.x.
9
Issues and problems in remedial education.补习教育中的问题
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1976 Oct;18(5):675-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1976.tb04218.x.
10
Indexing response to intervention: a longitudinal study of reading risk from kindergarten through third grade.对干预措施的索引反应:一项从幼儿园到三年级阅读风险的纵向研究。
J Learn Disabil. 2008 Mar-Apr;41(2):158-73. doi: 10.1177/0022219407313587.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility, Enjoyment, and Language Comprehension Impact of a Tablet- and GameFlow-Based Story-Listening Game for Kindergarteners: Methodological and Mixed Methods Study.一款基于平板电脑和游戏流程的幼儿园故事聆听游戏的可行性、趣味性及语言理解影响:方法学与混合方法研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2022 Mar 23;10(1):e34698. doi: 10.2196/34698.
2
Oral language deficits in familial dyslexia: A meta-analysis and review.家族性阅读障碍中的口语缺陷:一项荟萃分析与综述。
Psychol Bull. 2016 May;142(5):498-545. doi: 10.1037/bul0000037. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
3
Adherence and Dosage Contributions to Parenting Program Quality.
依从性和剂量对育儿计划质量的贡献。
J Soc Social Work Res. 2015 Dec;6(4):467-489. doi: 10.1086/684108.
4
The assessment of fidelity in a motor speech-treatment approach.运动性言语治疗方法中保真度的评估。
Speech Lang Hear. 2015 Mar;18(1):30-38. doi: 10.1179/2050572814Y.0000000046.
5
Developing Early Literacy Skills: A Meta-Analysis of Alphabet Learning and Instruction.培养早期读写能力:字母学习与教学的元分析
Read Res Q. 2010 Jan;45(1):8-38. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.45.1.2.
6
Dutch home-based pre-reading intervention with children at familial risk of dyslexia.荷兰家庭本位的阅读前干预对有阅读障碍家族风险的儿童。
Ann Dyslexia. 2009 Dec;59(2):169-95. doi: 10.1007/s11881-009-0030-0. Epub 2009 Nov 7.