Obradovic V, Artiko V, Petrovic M, Lausevic Z, Stojkovic M, Sobic-Saranovic D, Petrovic N, Vlajkovic M, Krivokapic Z
Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Beograd, Serbia and Montenegro.
Neoplasma. 2006;53(5):444-9.
The aim of the study was evaluation of the clinical reliability of the immunoscintigraphy for the detection of metastases and recurrences of colorectal carcinomas using three different radiopharmaceutical substances. With IMACIS 1, the number of true negative findings (TN) was 4/7 and true positive (TP) 3/7, while in one patient, the results of immunoscintigraphy significantly influenced the therapeutical management. With INDIMACIS 19-9, there were 2/8 TN and 6/8 TP. In three patients, immunoscintigraphy results influenced patient further management. With ONCOSCINT in 2 patients findings were TN, in one FN and in one FP. In 3 patients, immunoscintigraphy influenced the management of the patient. Other imaging methods (CT, US, MRI) have advantage in detection of liver metastases, while immunoscintigraphy is more specific for the assessment of reccurences of the abdominal tumors. Thus immunoscintigraphy should be applied in patients with suggested recurrences and inconclusive outcome of routine diagnostic workup.
本研究的目的是使用三种不同的放射性药物评估免疫闪烁显像检测结直肠癌转移和复发的临床可靠性。使用IMACIS 1时,真阴性结果(TN)的数量为4/7,真阳性(TP)为3/7,而在一名患者中,免疫闪烁显像的结果显著影响了治疗管理。使用INDIMACIS 19-9时,有2/8 TN和6/8 TP。在三名患者中,免疫闪烁显像结果影响了患者的进一步管理。使用ONCOSCINT时,2名患者的检查结果为TN,1名患者为假阴性(FN),1名患者为假阳性(FP)。在3名患者中,免疫闪烁显像影响了患者的管理。其他成像方法(CT、超声、MRI)在检测肝转移方面具有优势,而免疫闪烁显像在评估腹部肿瘤复发方面更具特异性。因此,免疫闪烁显像应应用于疑似复发且常规诊断检查结果不确定的患者。