Mendelson John, Uemura Naoto, Harris Debra, Nath Rajneesh P, Fernandez Emilio, Jacob Peyton, Everhart E Thomas, Jones Reese T
Addiction Pharmacology Research Laboratory, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, St Luke's Hospital, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Oct;80(4):403-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2006.06.013.
To help predict the consequences of precursor regulation, we compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the methamphetamine (INN, metamfetamine) stereoisomers.
In this study 12 methamphetamine abusers received intravenous d-methamphetamine (0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg), l-methamphetamine (0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg), racemic methamphetamine (0.5 mg/kg), or placebo with the use of a 6-session, double-blind, placebo-controlled, balanced crossover design. Pharmacokinetic measures (including area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC], elimination half-life, systemic clearance, apparent volume of distribution during the elimination phase, and apparent bioavailability) and pharmacodynamic measures (including heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and visual analog scale ratings for "intoxication," "good drug effect," and "drug liking") were obtained.
Pharmacokinetic parameters for the individual enantiomers given separately were similar, with dose-proportional increases in AUC and maximum plasma concentration. After racemate administration, the AUC for d-methamphetamine was 30% smaller than that for l-methamphetamine (P = .0085). The elimination half-lives were longer for l-methamphetamine (13.3-15.0 hours) than for d-methamphetamine (10.2-10.7 hours) (P < .0001). Compared with placebo, d-methamphetamine (0.25 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg, and racemic) increased the heart rate (P < .0001), blood pressure (P < .0001), and respiratory rate (P < .05), and this increase lasted for 6 hours. The peak heart rate changes after racemic methamphetamine and 0.5 mg/kg d- and l-methamphetamine were similar (18.7 +/- 23.4 beats/min, 13.5 +/- 18.5 beats/min, and 10.7 +/- 10.2 beats/min, respectively), but racemic methamphetamine and 0.5 mg/kg d-methamphetamine increased systolic blood pressure more than 0.5 mg/kg l-methamphetamine (33.4 +/- 17.8 beats/min and 34.5 +/- 18.9 beats/min, respectively, versus 19.5 +/- 11.3 beats/min; P < .01). l-Methamphetamine, 0.5 mg/kg, was psychoactive, producing peak intoxication (46.0 +/- 35.3 versus 30.3 +/- 24.9) and drug liking (47.7 +/- 35.1 versus 28.6 +/- 24.8) ratings similar to 0.5 mg/kg d-methamphetamine, but the effects of l-methamphetamine dissipated more quickly (approximately 3 hours versus 6 hours). The effects of 0.25 mg/kg l-methamphetamine were similar to those of placebo. Racemic methamphetamine was similar to d-methamphetamine with regard to most pharmacodynamic measures.
The pharmacokinetics of the methamphetamine enantiomers are similar, but there are substantial pharmacodynamic differences between the isomers. At high doses, l-methamphetamine intoxication is similar to that of d-methamphetamine, but the psychodynamic effects are shorter-lived and less desired by abusers. Racemic and d-methamphetamine have similar effects and would be expected to have comparable abuse liabilities.
为了帮助预测前体调节的后果,我们比较了甲基苯丙胺(国际非专利药品名称,去氧麻黄碱)立体异构体的药代动力学和药效学。
在本研究中,12名甲基苯丙胺滥用者采用6阶段、双盲、安慰剂对照、平衡交叉设计,接受静脉注射d-甲基苯丙胺(0.25和0.5mg/kg)、l-甲基苯丙胺(0.25和0.5mg/kg)、消旋甲基苯丙胺(0.5mg/kg)或安慰剂。获得了药代动力学指标(包括血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积[AUC]、消除半衰期、全身清除率、消除相表观分布容积和表观生物利用度)和药效学指标(包括心率、血压、呼吸频率以及“中毒”“良好药物效果”和“药物喜好”的视觉模拟评分)。
单独给予各对映体的药代动力学参数相似,AUC和最大血浆浓度呈剂量比例增加。给予消旋体后,d-甲基苯丙胺的AUC比l-甲基苯丙胺小30%(P = 0.0085)。l-甲基苯丙胺的消除半衰期(13.3 - 15.0小时)比d-甲基苯丙胺(10.2 - 10.7小时)长(P < 0.0001)。与安慰剂相比,d-甲基苯丙胺(0.25mg/kg、0.5mg/kg和消旋体)使心率(P < 0.0001)、血压(P < 0.0001)和呼吸频率增加(P < 0.05),且这种增加持续6小时。消旋甲基苯丙胺以及0.5mg/kg的d-和l-甲基苯丙胺后的心率峰值变化相似(分别为18.7±23.4次/分钟、13.5±18.5次/分钟和10.7±10.2次/分钟),但消旋甲基苯丙胺和0.5mg/kg的d-甲基苯丙胺比0.5mg/kg的l-甲基苯丙胺更能升高收缩压(分别为33.4±17.8次/分钟和34.5±18.9次/分钟,而0.5mg/kg的l-甲基苯丙胺为19.5±11.3次/分钟;P < 0.01)。0.5mg/kg的l-甲基苯丙胺具有精神活性,产生的中毒峰值(46.0±35.3对30.3±24.9)和药物喜好峰值(47.7±35.1对28.6±24.8)与0.5mg/kg的d-甲基苯丙胺相似,但l-甲基苯丙胺的作用消散更快(约3小时对6小时)。0.25mg/kg的l-甲基苯丙胺的作用与安慰剂相似。消旋甲基苯丙胺在大多数药效学指标上与d-甲基苯丙胺相似。
甲基苯丙胺对映体的药代动力学相似,但异构体之间存在显著的药效学差异。高剂量时,l-甲基苯丙胺中毒与d-甲基苯丙胺相似,但精神动力学作用持续时间较短,滥用者对其需求较低。消旋甲基苯丙胺和d-甲基苯丙胺作用相似,预计具有相当的滥用可能性。