Suppr超能文献

德克萨斯药物算法项目患者及家属教育计划的实施。

Implementation of the Texas Medication Algorithm Project patient and family education program.

作者信息

Toprac Marcia G, Dennehy Ellen B, Carmody Thomas J, Crismon M Lynn, Miller Alexander L, Trivedi Madhukar H, Suppes Trisha, Rush A John

机构信息

TX, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Sep;67(9):1362-72. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0906.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This article describes the implementation and utilization of the patient and family education program (PFEP) component of the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP). The extent of participation, types of psychoeducation received, and predictors of receiving at least a minimum level of education are presented.

METHOD

TMAP included medication guidelines, a dedicated clinical coordinator, standardized assessments of symptoms and side effects, uniform documentation, and a PFEP. The PFEP includes phased, multimodal, disorder-specific educational materials for patients and families. Participants were adult outpatients of 1 of 7 community mental health centers in Texas that were implementing the TMAP disease management package. Patients had DSM-IV clinical diagnoses of major depressive disorder, with or without psychotic features; bipolar I disorder or schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type; or schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Assessments were administered by independent research coordinators. Study data were collected between March 1998 and March 2000, and patients participated for at least 1 year.

RESULTS

Of the 487 participants, nearly all (95.1%) had at least 1 educational encounter, but only 53.6% of participants met criteria for "minimum exposure" to individual education interventions. Furthermore, only 31.0% participated in group education, and 42.5% had a family member involved in at least 1 encounter. Participants with schizophrenia were less involved in the PFEP across multiple indicators of utilization. Diagnosis, intensity of symptoms, age, and receipt of public assistance were related to the likelihood of exposure to minimum levels of individual education.

CONCLUSION

Despite adequate resources and infrastructure to provide PFEP, utilization was less than anticipated. Although implementation guidelines were uniform across diagnoses, participants with schizophrenia experienced less exposure to psychoeducation. Recommendations for improving program implementation and modification of materials are discussed.

摘要

目的

本文描述了得克萨斯药物治疗算法项目(TMAP)中患者及家属教育项目(PFEP)部分的实施与利用情况。呈现了参与程度、接受的心理教育类型以及接受至少最低水平教育的预测因素。

方法

TMAP包括药物治疗指南、一名专职临床协调员、症状和副作用的标准化评估、统一的文档记录以及一个PFEP。PFEP包括针对患者和家属的分阶段、多模式、特定疾病的教育材料。参与者是得克萨斯州7个社区心理健康中心中实施TMAP疾病管理套餐的1个中心的成年门诊患者。患者有DSM-IV临床诊断的重度抑郁症,伴有或不伴有精神病性特征;双相I型障碍或精神分裂情感障碍,双相型;或精神分裂症或精神分裂情感障碍。评估由独立的研究协调员进行。研究数据于1998年3月至2000年3月收集,患者参与至少1年。

结果

在487名参与者中,几乎所有人(95.1%)至少有1次教育接触,但只有53.6%的参与者符合“最低接触”个体教育干预的标准。此外,只有31.0%的人参加了团体教育,42.5%的人有家庭成员参与至少1次接触。在多个利用指标方面,精神分裂症患者较少参与PFEP。诊断、症状强度、年龄和接受公共援助与接触最低水平个体教育的可能性有关。

结论

尽管有足够的资源和基础设施来提供PFEP,但利用率低于预期。尽管实施指南在不同诊断中是统一的,但精神分裂症患者接受心理教育的机会较少。讨论了改进项目实施和修改材料的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验