• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抑郁症治疗一年期间脱落的预测因素:个性化干预路线图。

Predictors of attrition during one year of depression treatment: a roadmap to personalized intervention.

作者信息

Warden Diane, Rush A John, Carmody Thomas J, Kashner T Michael, Biggs Melanie M, Crismon M Lynn, Trivedi Madhukar H

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9119, USA.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Pract. 2009 Mar;15(2):113-24. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000348364.88676.83.

DOI:10.1097/01.pra.0000348364.88676.83
PMID:19339845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2866198/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Attrition from treatment in the short and long term for major depressive disorder (MDD) is clearly an adverse outcome. To assist in tailoring the delivery of interventions to specific patients to reduce attrition, this study reports the incidence, timing, and predictors of attrition from outpatient treatment in public mental health clinics.

METHODS

Outpatients with psychotic and nonpsychotic MDD receiving measurement-based care in the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (N=179) were evaluated to determine timing and rates of attrition as well as baseline sociodemographic, clinical, and attitudinal predictors of attrition.

RESULTS

Overall, 23% (42/179) of the patients left treatment by 6 months, and 47% (84/179) left by 12 months. Specific beliefs about the impact of medication, such as its perceived harmfulness, predicted attrition at both 6 and 12 months. Younger age (P=0.0004) and fewer side effects at baseline (P=0.0376) were associated with attrition at 6 months. Younger age (P=0.0013), better perceived physical functioning (P=0.0007), and more negative attitudes about psychiatric medications at baseline (P=0.0075) were associated with attrition at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts to elicit attitudes about medications and tailoring educational and other retention interventions for patients with negative beliefs about antidepressants both when initiating a new medication and throughout treatment may reduce attrition. Particular focus on younger patients and those requiring frequent visits may be helpful.

摘要

目的

重度抑郁症(MDD)患者在短期和长期治疗中的脱落显然是一种不良后果。为了帮助针对特定患者调整干预措施的实施以减少脱落,本研究报告了公共精神卫生诊所门诊治疗中脱落的发生率、时间以及预测因素。

方法

对在德克萨斯药物算法项目中接受基于测量的护理的患有精神病性和非精神病性MDD的门诊患者(N = 179)进行评估,以确定脱落的时间和发生率以及脱落的基线社会人口统计学、临床和态度预测因素。

结果

总体而言,23%(42/179)的患者在6个月时停止治疗,47%(84/179)的患者在12个月时停止治疗。对药物影响的特定信念,如认为其有害性,在6个月和12个月时均预测了脱落。年龄较小(P = 0.0004)和基线时副作用较少(P = 0.0376)与6个月时的脱落有关。年龄较小(P = 0.0013)、自我感觉身体功能较好(P = 0.0007)以及基线时对精神科药物的负面态度较多(P = 0.0075)与12个月时的脱落有关。

结论

在开始新药治疗时以及整个治疗过程中,努力了解患者对药物的态度,并为对抗抑郁药有负面信念的患者量身定制教育和其他留住患者的干预措施,可能会减少脱落。特别关注年轻患者和那些需要频繁就诊的患者可能会有所帮助。

相似文献

1
Predictors of attrition during one year of depression treatment: a roadmap to personalized intervention.抑郁症治疗一年期间脱落的预测因素:个性化干预路线图。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2009 Mar;15(2):113-24. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000348364.88676.83.
2
What predicts attrition in second step medication treatments for depression?: a STAR*D Report.抑郁症第二步药物治疗中哪些因素可预测治疗中断?:一项STAR*D报告。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009 May;12(4):459-73. doi: 10.1017/S1461145708009073. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
3
Income and attrition in the treatment of depression: a STAR*D report.抑郁症治疗中的收入与损耗:STAR*D报告
Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(7):622-33. doi: 10.1002/da.20541.
4
Predictors of attrition during initial (citalopram) treatment for depression: a STAR*D report.抑郁症初始(西酞普兰)治疗期间脱落的预测因素:一项STAR*D报告。
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;164(8):1189-97. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06071225.
5
Retention and attrition among African Americans in the STAR*D study: what causes research volunteers to stay or stray?STAR*D 研究中非裔美国人的保留和流失:是什么导致研究志愿者留下来或离开?
Depress Anxiety. 2013 Nov;30(11):1137-44. doi: 10.1002/da.22134. Epub 2013 May 30.
6
One-year clinical outcomes of depressed public sector outpatients: a benchmark for subsequent studies.公共部门门诊抑郁症患者的一年临床结局:后续研究的基准
Biol Psychiatry. 2004 Jul 1;56(1):46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.04.005.
7
Explaining patients' beliefs about the necessity and harmfulness of antidepressants.解释患者对抗抑郁药必要性和危害性的看法。
Ann Fam Med. 2008 Jan-Feb;6(1):23-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.759.
8
Less is more in antidepressant clinical trials: a meta-analysis of the effect of visit frequency on treatment response and dropout.在抗抑郁药临床试验中,少即是多:对就诊频率对治疗反应和脱落影响的荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;74(7):703-15. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12r08267.
9
Determinants of attrition from cessation treatment in smokers with a history of major depressive disorder.有重度抑郁症病史的吸烟者戒烟治疗中脱落的决定因素。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2000 Jun;14(2):134-42. doi: 10.1037//0893-164x.14.2.134.
10
Underrecognition of clinically significant side effects in depressed outpatients.抑郁门诊患者中临床显著副作用的识别不足。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;71(4):484-90. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04978blu.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting the wellbeing of the whole person: a within-subjects mixed-methods study exploring the effects of the flourishing intervention among individuals with depressive symptoms.促进人的整体幸福感:一项探索蓬勃发展干预对有抑郁症状个体影响的被试内混合方法研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 19;16:1532843. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1532843. eCollection 2025.
2
The Unsolved Problem of Attrition Rates on Randomized Clinical Trials for Cocaine Use Disorders: A Scoping Review.可卡因使用障碍随机临床试验中损耗率的未解决问题:一项范围综述。
Subst Use Addctn J. 2025 Jul;46(3):757-782. doi: 10.1177/29767342251326374. Epub 2025 May 5.
3
The association of baseline depressive symptoms and stress on withdrawal in a national longitudinal cohort: the REGARDS study.基线抑郁症状和压力与全国纵向队列研究中戒断的关联:REGARDS 研究。
Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Aug;84:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.05.007. Epub 2023 May 12.
4
Non-overweight depressed patients who respond to antidepressant treatment have a higher risk of later metabolic syndrome: findings from the METADAP cohort.对抗抑郁治疗有反应的非超重抑郁症患者日后发生代谢综合征的风险更高:来自METADAP队列的研究结果。
Psychol Med. 2023 Oct;53(14):6560-6569. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722003919. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
5
Within Clinic Reliability and Usability of a Voice-Based Amazon Alexa Administration of the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ 9).基于语音的亚马逊 Alexa 版患者健康问卷 9(PHQ 9)在诊所中的可靠性和可用性。
J Med Syst. 2022 May 10;46(6):38. doi: 10.1007/s10916-022-01816-0.
6
The effects of self-management interventions on depressive symptoms in adults with chronic physical disease(s) experiencing depressive symptomatology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.自我管理干预对患有慢性躯体疾病(s)并出现抑郁症状的成年人抑郁症状的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 20;21(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03504-8.
7
Patterns of care and dropout rates from outpatient mental healthcare in low-, middle- and high-income countries from the World Health Organization's World Mental Health Survey Initiative.中低收入国家与高收入国家的世界卫生组织世界精神卫生调查倡议中的门诊精神卫生保健的护理模式和辍学率。
Psychol Med. 2021 Sep;51(12):2104-2116. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720000884. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
8
Paroxetine versus Venlafaxine and Escitalopram in Korean Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Rater-blinded, Six-week Study.帕罗西汀与文拉法辛及艾司西酞普兰治疗韩国重度抑郁症患者的疗效比较:一项随机、评估者盲法、为期六周的研究
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2017 Nov 30;15(4):391-401. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2017.15.4.391.
9
Benefits and challenges of using the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design for testing an intervention for depression.使用队列多重随机对照试验设计来测试抑郁症干预措施的益处与挑战。
Trials. 2017 Jul 6;18(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2059-4.
10
Treating major depression with yoga: A prospective, randomized, controlled pilot trial.瑜伽治疗重度抑郁症:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 16;12(3):e0173869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173869. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
The compliance with antidepressants in general practice.一般实践中抗抑郁药的依从性。
J Psychopharmacol. 1994 Jan;8(1):48-52. doi: 10.1177/026988119400800108.
2
What predicts attrition in second step medication treatments for depression?: a STAR*D Report.抑郁症第二步药物治疗中哪些因素可预测治疗中断?:一项STAR*D报告。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009 May;12(4):459-73. doi: 10.1017/S1461145708009073. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
3
Perspectives from the clinic: will the average physician embrace personalized medicine?
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Mar;83(3):492-3. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100486. Epub 2008 Feb 6.
4
Explaining patients' beliefs about the necessity and harmfulness of antidepressants.解释患者对抗抑郁药必要性和危害性的看法。
Ann Fam Med. 2008 Jan-Feb;6(1):23-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.759.
5
Predictors of attrition during initial (citalopram) treatment for depression: a STAR*D report.抑郁症初始(西酞普兰)治疗期间脱落的预测因素:一项STAR*D报告。
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;164(8):1189-97. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06071225.
6
Maximizing the adequacy of medication treatment in controlled trials and clinical practice: STAR(*)D measurement-based care.在对照试验和临床实践中最大化药物治疗的充分性:STAR(*)D基于测量的照护
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007 Dec;32(12):2479-89. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301390. Epub 2007 Apr 4.
7
Measurement-based care for refractory depression: a clinical decision support model for clinical research and practice.难治性抑郁症的基于测量的护理:一种用于临床研究和实践的临床决策支持模型。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 May;88 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.01.007. Epub 2007 Feb 22.
8
Nontricyclic antidepressants: predictors of nonadherence.非三环类抗抑郁药:不依从性的预测因素。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Dec;26(6):643-7. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000246217.34024.53.
9
Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report.需要一个或多个治疗步骤的抑郁症门诊患者的急性和长期转归:STAR*D报告
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1905-17. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905.
10
Implementation of the Texas Medication Algorithm Project patient and family education program.德克萨斯药物算法项目患者及家属教育计划的实施。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Sep;67(9):1362-72. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0906.