Suppr超能文献

计算机辅助CT结肠成像检测软件:球形度过滤器对有无粪便标记患者性能特征的影响

Computer assisted detection software for CT colonography: effect of sphericity filter on performance characteristics for patients with and without fecal tagging.

作者信息

Dehmeshki Jamshid, Halligan Steve, Taylor Stuart A, Roddie Mary E, McQuillan Justine, Honeyfield Lesley, Amin Hamdan

机构信息

Medicsight PLC, Berkeley Sq, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2007 Mar;17(3):662-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0430-z. Epub 2006 Oct 5.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of changing sphericity filter values on performance of a computer assisted detection (CAD) system for CT colonography for data with and without fecal tagging. Colonography data from 138 patients with 317 validated polyps were divided into those with (86) and without (52) fecal tagging. Polyp coordinates were established by three observers and datasets analysed subsequently by a proprietary CAD system used at four discrete sphericity filter settings. Prompts were compared with the known coordinates in order to determine sensitivity and specificity. Sensitivity was highest at low sphericity; of 164 polyps 6 mm or more, 144 (87.8%) were detected at sphericity 0.3, and 132 (80.1%) at sphericity 0.9. Of 42 polyps measuring 10 mm or more, 40 (95.2%) were detected at sphericity 0.3, and 36 (85.7%) at sphericity 0.9. There was no significant difference in sensitivity for tagged and un-tagged data but specificity was reduced in tagged data at low sphericity and significantly reduced in untagged data at high sphericity. CAD had a sensitivity of 95.2% for polyps measuring 1 cm or more and 87.8% for polyps 6 mm or more when used at a sphericity setting of 0.3. Higher sphericity settings increased specificity while reducing sensitivity. The bowel preparation used significantly impacts on specificity.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨改变球形度滤波器值对有和没有粪便标记的CT结肠成像计算机辅助检测(CAD)系统性能的影响。来自138例患者的317个经证实的息肉的结肠成像数据被分为有粪便标记(86例)和无粪便标记(52例)两组。息肉坐标由三名观察者确定,随后数据集由一个在四个离散球形度滤波器设置下使用的专有CAD系统进行分析。将提示与已知坐标进行比较,以确定敏感性和特异性。在低球形度时敏感性最高;在164个6毫米或更大的息肉中,在球形度为0.3时检测到144个(87.8%),在球形度为0.9时检测到132个(80.1%)。在42个10毫米或更大的息肉中,在球形度为0.3时检测到40个(95.2%),在球形度为0.9时检测到36个(85.7%)。有标记和无标记数据的敏感性没有显著差异,但在低球形度时标记数据的特异性降低,在高球形度时无标记数据的特异性显著降低。当在球形度设置为0.3时使用时,CAD对1厘米或更大的息肉的敏感性为95.2%,对6毫米或更大的息肉的敏感性为87.8%。较高的球形度设置增加了特异性,同时降低了敏感性。所使用的肠道准备对特异性有显著影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验