Suppr超能文献

使用电子射野影像装置(EPID)测量评估两种预测多叶准直器(MLC)叶片位置方法的研究。

Evaluation of two methods of predicting MLC leaf positions using EPID measurements.

作者信息

Parent Laure, Seco Joao, Evans Phil M, Dance David R, Fielding Andrew

机构信息

Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT United Kingdom.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2006 Sep;33(9):3174-82. doi: 10.1118/1.2335490.

Abstract

In intensity modulated radiation treatments (IMRT), the position of the field edges and the modulation within the beam are often achieved with a multileaf collimator (MLC). During the MLC calibration process, due to the finite accuracy of leaf position measurements, a systematic error may be introduced to leaf positions. Thereafter leaf positions of the MLC depend on the systematic error introduced on each leaf during MLC calibration and on the accuracy of the leaf position control system (random errors). This study presents and evaluates two methods to predict the systematic errors on the leaf positions introduced during the MLC calibration. The two presented methods are based on a series of electronic portal imaging device (EPID) measurements. A comparison with film measurements showed that the EPID could be used to measure leaf positions without introducing any bias. The first method, referred to as the "central leaf method," is based on the method currently used at this center for MLC leaf calibration. It mimics the manner in which leaf calibration parameters are specified in the MLC control system and consequently is also used by other centers. The second method, a new method proposed by the authors and referred to as the "individual leaf method," involves the measurement of two positions for each leaf (-5 and +15 cm) and the interpolation and extrapolation from these two points to any other given position. The central leaf method and the individual leaf method predicted leaf positions at prescribed positions of -11, 0, 5, and 10 cm within 2.3 and 1.0 mm, respectively, with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.3 and 0.2 mm, respectively. The individual leaf method provided a better prediction of the leaf positions than the central leaf method. Reproducibility tests for leaf positions of -5 and +15 cm were performed. The reproducibility was within 0.4 mm on the same day and 0.4 mm six weeks later (1 SD). Measurements at gantry angles of 0 degrees, 90 degrees, and 270 degrees for leaf positions of -5 and +15 cm showed no significant effect of gravity. The individual leaf method could be used in various applications to improve the accuracy of radiotherapy treatment from planning to delivery. Three cases are discussed: IMRT beam verification, MLC calibration and dose calculation.

摘要

在调强放射治疗(IMRT)中,射野边缘的位置以及射束内的调制通常通过多叶准直器(MLC)来实现。在MLC校准过程中,由于叶片位置测量的精度有限,可能会给叶片位置引入系统误差。此后,MLC的叶片位置取决于MLC校准期间在每个叶片上引入的系统误差以及叶片位置控制系统的精度(随机误差)。本研究提出并评估了两种预测MLC校准期间引入的叶片位置系统误差的方法。所提出的两种方法基于一系列电子射野影像装置(EPID)测量。与胶片测量的比较表明,EPID可用于测量叶片位置而不会引入任何偏差。第一种方法,称为“中心叶片法”,基于该中心目前用于MLC叶片校准的方法。它模仿了在MLC控制系统中指定叶片校准参数的方式,因此也被其他中心使用。第二种方法是作者提出的一种新方法,称为“单个叶片法”,涉及测量每个叶片的两个位置(-5和+15 cm),并从这两个点内插和外推到任何其他给定位置。中心叶片法和单个叶片法分别在2.3和1.0 mm内预测了在-11、0、5和10 cm规定位置处的叶片位置,标准差(SD)分别为0.3和0.2 mm。单个叶片法比中心叶片法能更好地预测叶片位置。对-5和+15 cm的叶片位置进行了重复性测试。同一天的重复性在0.4 mm以内,六周后的重复性为0.4 mm(1 SD)。在0度、90度和270度机架角度下对-5和+15 cm叶片位置的测量表明重力没有显著影响。单个叶片法可用于各种应用,以提高从放疗治疗计划到实施的准确性。讨论了三个案例:IMRT射束验证、MLC校准和剂量计算。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验