Akarsu Serdar, Köprülü Hülya
Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
J Clin Dent. 2006;17(3):53-8.
The purpose of this study was to compare in vivo the efficacy of DIAGNOdent measurements in the diagnosis of occlusal caries with conventional diagnostic methods (visual inspection and radiographic methods).
A total of 187 molar teeth in 161 individuals (87 female, 74 male) between the ages of 18 and 25, who were admitted to the Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, were included in this study. The study was evaluated by Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine Ethical Committee and approved as ethically applicable. In the diagnostic phase of the study, all subjects' teeth were evaluated by two observers sequentially by visual inspection, radiography, and using DIAGNOdent. Carious lesions on the occlusal surfaces of molar teeth, which were evaluated by visual inspection, radiography and DIAGNOdent, were removed by using rotational cutting devices. Resulting cavities following caries removal were visually evaluated, and the level of caries was determined.
Statistically significant differences were found when the visual inspection results, radiographic evaluation results, and DIAGNOdent evaluation results of two observers were compared for cavity depths.
Although DIAGNOdent is an important diagnostic device, particularly for diagnosing hidden carious lesions in the dentine layer, it should be used along with visual examination in clinical practice, as DIAGNOdent is not superior to visual examination in detecting early stages of carious lesions.
本研究的目的是在体内比较DIAGNOdent测量法与传统诊断方法(目视检查和放射照相法)在诊断咬合面龋方面的疗效。
本研究纳入了161名年龄在18至25岁之间的个体(87名女性,74名男性)的187颗磨牙,这些个体均被纳入了于尔居普大学牙科学院修复牙科系。该研究经于尔居普大学医学院伦理委员会评估,并被批准在伦理上适用。在研究的诊断阶段,两名观察者依次通过目视检查、放射照相和使用DIAGNOdent对所有受试者的牙齿进行评估。通过目视检查、放射照相和DIAGNOdent评估的磨牙咬合面龋损,使用旋转切割装置予以去除。去除龋坏组织后形成的窝洞进行目视评估,并确定龋损程度。
比较两名观察者的目视检查结果、放射照相评估结果和DIAGNOdent评估结果的龋洞深度时,发现存在统计学上的显著差异。
尽管DIAGNOdent是一种重要的诊断设备,特别是对于诊断牙本质层中的隐匿性龋损,但在临床实践中应与目视检查一起使用,因为DIAGNOdent在检测龋损早期阶段并不优于目视检查。