Suppr超能文献

使用同心针和单极针的女性在疼痛感知上的差异。

Differences in pain perception in women using concentric and monopolar needles.

作者信息

Balbierz Janet M, Petajan Jack H, Alder Stephen C, Vlach Sarah A

机构信息

Northwest Physical Medicine, McMinnville, OR, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Oct;87(10):1403-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.06.017.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine pain perception using concentric needle electrodes and monopolar needle electrodes in an all-female study group without underlying hand or arm pain complaints, using study subjects as their own controls.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized study. Two muscles--the biceps and abductor pollicis brevis (APB)--were examined using both a concentric needle electrode and a monopolar needle electrode.

SETTING

University community.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty healthy female employees at the University of Utah and Primary Children's Hospital were enrolled. All completed the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain scores. Posttest verbal analog pain scale (0-10) measures were obtained after each muscle was studied. A subset of subjects (n=51) was asked to identify needle preference after completion of the study.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in mean pain scores between the concentric needle electrode and the monopolar needle electrode (3.06 and 3.10, respectively; P=.803). The APB muscle was significantly more painful than the biceps muscle with both needle types (mean pain scores, 3.92 and 2.24, respectively; P<.001). In the subset of subjects asked to identify needle preference after completion of the study, 21 chose a concentric needle electrode and 30 a monopolar needle electrode. This difference was not statistically significant. However, verbal analog pain scores were lower with the needle preferred by each subject (P<.20).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant difference in mean pain scores reported between a concentric needle electrode and a monopolar needle electrode. Subjects were clear on the needle they preferred, and the pain scores reported for the less painful needle were lower than those for the other needle.

摘要

目的

在一个无手部或手臂疼痛主诉的全女性研究组中,以研究对象自身作为对照,使用同心针电极和单极针电极来检测疼痛感知。

设计

前瞻性随机研究。使用同心针电极和单极针电极对两块肌肉——肱二头肌和拇短展肌(APB)进行检测。

地点

大学社区。

参与者

招募了犹他大学和 Primary Children's Hospital 的 80 名健康女性员工。所有人均完成了研究。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

疼痛评分。在对每块肌肉进行研究后,获取测试后的视觉模拟疼痛量表(0 - 10)测量值。研究结束后,一部分受试者(n = 51)被要求确定对针的偏好。

结果

同心针电极和单极针电极的平均疼痛评分无显著差异(分别为 3.06 和 3.10;P = 0.803)。两种针型检测时,APB 肌肉的疼痛程度均显著高于肱二头肌(平均疼痛评分分别为 3.92 和 2.24;P < 0.001)。在研究结束后被要求确定针偏好的受试者子集中,21 人选择了同心针电极,30 人选择了单极针电极。这种差异无统计学意义。然而,每位受试者偏好的针的视觉模拟疼痛评分较低(P < 0.20)。

结论

同心针电极和单极针电极报告的平均疼痛评分无显著差异。受试者对其偏好的针很明确,且较不疼痛的针所报告的疼痛评分低于另一根针。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验