Gönner S, Bischoff C
Psychosomatische Fachklinik Bad Dürkheim, Kurbrunnenstrasse 12, 67098 Bad Dürkheim.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2006 Oct;45(5):282-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-940000.
Psychotherapists are considered to be sceptical of empirical measures of quality assurance. It is generally recognised that the success of these measures mainly depends on how they are accepted by the people involved.
The acceptance of a quality monitoring system among psychotherapists was investigated with a standardised assessment instrument.
Practical relevance and practicability of the system were judged positively on the following dimensions: "support of clinical diagnostics", "examination of the outcome", "reflecting on the therapeutic process", "documentation", "integration in the therapeutic process", "pressure to succeed and control" and "work loading". The factors "professional experience", "profession" and "sex" had just a small influence on the degree of acceptance of the quality monitoring system.
Psychotherapists consider a practically relevant and economical quality monitoring system as useful.
心理治疗师被认为对质量保证的实证测量持怀疑态度。人们普遍认识到，这些措施的成功主要取决于相关人员对它们的接受程度。
使用标准化评估工具对心理治疗师对质量监测系统的接受情况进行调查。
该系统在以下维度上的实际相关性和实用性得到了积极评价：“支持临床诊断”、“结果检查”、“反思治疗过程”、“记录”、“融入治疗过程”、“成功压力与控制”以及“工作负担”。“专业经验”、“职业”和“性别”等因素对质量监测系统的接受程度影响较小。
心理治疗师认为一个具有实际相关性且经济的质量监测系统是有用的。
