Maguire Eleanor A, Woollett Katherine, Spiers Hugo J
Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
Hippocampus. 2006;16(12):1091-101. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20233.
Licensed London taxi drivers show that humans have a remarkable capacity to acquire and use knowledge of a large complex city to navigate within it. Gray matter volume differences in the hippocampus relative to controls have been reported to accompany this expertise. While these gray matter differences could result from using and updating spatial representations, they might instead be influenced by factors such as self-motion, driving experience, and stress. We examined the contribution of these factors by comparing London taxi drivers with London bus drivers, who were matched for driving experience and levels of stress, but differed in that they follow a constrained set of routes. We found that compared with bus drivers, taxi drivers had greater gray matter volume in mid-posterior hippocampi and less volume in anterior hippocampi. Furthermore, years of navigation experience correlated with hippocampal gray matter volume only in taxi drivers, with right posterior gray matter volume increasing and anterior volume decreasing with more navigation experience. This suggests that spatial knowledge, and not stress, driving, or self-motion, is associated with the pattern of hippocampal gray matter volume in taxi drivers. We then tested for functional differences between the groups and found that the ability to acquire new visuo-spatial information was worse in taxi drivers than in bus drivers. We speculate that a complex spatial representation, which facilitates expert navigation and is associated with greater posterior hippocampal gray matter volume, might come at a cost to new spatial memories and gray matter volume in the anterior hippocampus.
获得许可的伦敦出租车司机表明,人类具有非凡的能力来获取和运用关于一个大型复杂城市的知识,以便在其中导航。据报道,与对照组相比,海马体中的灰质体积差异伴随着这种专业技能。虽然这些灰质差异可能是由于使用和更新空间表征导致的,但它们也可能受到自我运动、驾驶经验和压力等因素的影响。我们通过将伦敦出租车司机与伦敦公交车司机进行比较,研究了这些因素的作用。这两组司机的驾驶经验和压力水平相当,但不同之处在于公交车司机遵循一组固定的路线。我们发现,与公交车司机相比,出租车司机中后海马体的灰质体积更大,前海马体的灰质体积更小。此外,只有出租车司机的导航经验年限与海马体灰质体积相关,随着导航经验的增加,右侧后灰质体积增加,前灰质体积减少。这表明,空间知识而非压力、驾驶或自我运动,与出租车司机海马体灰质体积的模式相关。然后,我们测试了两组之间的功能差异,发现出租车司机获取新视觉空间信息的能力比公交车司机差。我们推测,一种有助于专家导航且与更大的后海马体灰质体积相关的复杂空间表征,可能是以牺牲新的空间记忆和前海马体中的灰质体积为代价的。