Rao Satish S C, Kavlock Renae, Rao Sheila
Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1009, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Dec;101(12):2790-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00827.x. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
Whether defecation is influenced by body position or stool characteristics is unclear.
We investigated effects of body position, presence of stool-like sensation, and stool form on defecation patterns and manometric profiles.
Rectal and anal pressures were assessed in 25 healthy volunteers during attempted defecation either in the lying or sitting positions and with balloon-filled or empty rectum. Subjects also expelled a water-filled (50 cc) balloon or silicone-stool (FECOM) either lying or sitting and rated their stooling sensation.
When attempting to defecate in the lying position, a dyssynergic pattern was seen in 36% of subjects with empty rectum and 24% with distended rectum. When sitting, 20% showed dyssynergia with empty rectum and 8% with distended rectum. More subjects (p < 0.05) showed dyssynergia in lying position. When lying, 60% could not expel balloon and 44% FECOM. When sitting, fewer (p < 0.05) failed to expel balloon (16%) or FECOM (4%). FECOM expulsion time was quicker (p < 0.02). Stool-like sensation was more commonly (p < 0.005) evoked by FECOM than balloon.
In the lying position, one-third showed dyssynergia and one-half could not expel artificial stool. Whereas when sitting with distended rectum, most showed normal defecation pattern and ability to expel stool. Thus, body position, sensation of stooling and stool characteristics may each influence defecation. Defecation is best evaluated in the sitting position with artificial stool.
排便是否受体位或粪便特征影响尚不清楚。
我们研究了体位、便意以及粪便形态对排便模式和测压曲线的影响。
对25名健康志愿者在尝试排便时进行直肠和肛管压力评估,排便姿势分为卧位和坐位,直肠状态分为充气球和空直肠。受试者还在卧位或坐位时排出一个充水(50毫升)的气球或硅胶粪便(FECOM),并对排便感觉进行评分。
尝试卧位排便时,直肠空虚的受试者中有36%出现排便协同失调模式,直肠扩张的受试者中有24%出现该模式。坐位排便时,直肠空虚的受试者中有20%出现排便协同失调,直肠扩张的受试者中有8%出现该模式。更多受试者(p<0.05)在卧位时出现排便协同失调。卧位时,60%的受试者无法排出气球,44%无法排出FECOM。坐位时,排出气球(16%)或FECOM(4%)失败的受试者较少(p<0.05)。FECOM排出时间更快(p<0.02)。FECOM比气球更常引起便意(p<0.005)。
卧位时,三分之一的受试者出现排便协同失调,一半的受试者无法排出人工粪便。而直肠扩张时坐位排便,大多数受试者排便模式正常且有排出粪便的能力。因此,体位、排便感觉和粪便特征均可能影响排便。使用人工粪便在坐位时评估排便情况最佳。