• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缝线与缝线锚钉——2006年更新

Sutures and suture anchors--update 2006.

作者信息

Barber F Alan, Herbert Morley A, Coons David A, Boothby Michael H

机构信息

Plano Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Center, Plano, Texas 75093, USA.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2006 Oct;22(10):1063.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.106.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.106
PMID:17027403
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate recently introduced sutures and suture anchors for single pull load to failure strength and failure mode.

METHODS

Suture anchors were tested in fresh porcine metaphyseal cortex and cancellous troughs with the use of an established protocol. An Instron machine applied tensile loads parallel to the axis of insertion at a rate of 12.5 mm/sec until failure, and mean anchor failure strengths were calculated. The mode of failure (anchor pull-out, suture eyelet cut-out, or suture failure) was recorded. Anchors tested included the BioRaptor 2.9, BioZip, Super Revo, Impact, Allograft cortical anchor, SpiraLok, Herculon, AxyaLoop titanium anchors 3, 5, and 6.5 mm, AxyaLoop bioabsorbable anchors 3, 5, and 6.5, ParaFix titanium anchors 3, 5, and 6.5, ParaSorb BioAnchors 3, 5.5, and 6.5, and Bio-Corkscrew FT. Sutures were also tested through an established protocol for load to failure. Sutures tested consisted of Orthocord, Ultrabraid (White and CoBraid), ForceFiber, Hi-Fi, MagnumWire, and Maxbraid Polyethylene Plus.

RESULTS

Mean failure loads were as follows: BioRaptor 238 N, BioZip 366 N, double-loaded Super Revo 486 N, triple-loaded Super Revo 362 N, Impact 202 N, Allograft cortical anchor 240 N, SpiraLok 289 N, Herculon 819 N, AxyaLoop titanium anchors 3.0 (335 N), 5.0 (485 N), and 6.5 mm (465 N), AxyaLoop bioabsorbable anchors 3 (143 N), 5 (395 N), and 6.5 (369 N), ParaFix titanium anchors 3 (335 N), 5 (485 N), and 6.5 (465 N), ParaSorb BioAnchors 3 (143 N), 5.5 (395 N), and 6.5 (369 N), and Bio-Corkscrew FT (260 N). The sutures all broke at the mid point of their tested strands away from the grips. Mean suture strength for No. 2 Orthocord was 92 N; for No. 2 Ultrabraid CoBraid and White, strengths were 265 N and 280 N, respectively; strength for No. 2 Force Fiber was 289 N, for No. 2 Hi-Fi 250 N, for No. 2 MagnumWire 303 N, and for No. 2 Maxbraid Polyethylene Plus 256 N.

CONCLUSIONS

Newer suture products showed significant improvements in load to failure values when compared with braided polyester sutures. Higher load to failure values continue to be seen in metal versus biodegradable anchors and in screw-type versus nonscrew designs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Surgeons who prefer stronger sutures now have several high-strength suture options from which to choose. Most of the new anchors tested performed very well.

摘要

目的

评估近期推出的缝线和缝线锚钉的单次拉伸至断裂强度及断裂模式。

方法

采用既定方案在新鲜猪的干骺端皮质骨和松质骨槽中测试缝线锚钉。一台英斯特朗材料试验机以12.5毫米/秒的速率沿插入轴方向施加拉伸载荷直至断裂,并计算锚钉的平均断裂强度。记录断裂模式(锚钉拔出、缝线孔眼切断或缝线断裂)。测试的锚钉包括BioRaptor 2.9、BioZip、Super Revo、Impact、同种异体皮质骨锚钉、SpiraLok、Herculon、AxyaLoop钛质锚钉3毫米、5毫米和6.5毫米、AxyaLoop生物可吸收锚钉3毫米、5毫米和6.5毫米、ParaFix钛质锚钉3毫米、5毫米和6.5毫米、ParaSorb生物锚钉3毫米、5.5毫米和6.5毫米以及Bio-Corkscrew FT。缝线也通过既定的断裂载荷方案进行测试。测试的缝线包括Orthocord、Ultrabraid(白色和共编织)、ForceFiber、Hi-Fi、MagnumWire和Maxbraid Polyethylene Plus。

结果

平均断裂载荷如下:BioRaptor为238牛,BioZip为366牛,双加载Super Revo为486牛,三加载Super Revo为362牛,Impact为202牛,同种异体皮质骨锚钉为240牛,SpiraLok为289牛,Herculon为819牛,AxyaLoop钛质锚钉3.0毫米(335牛)、5.0毫米(485牛)和6.5毫米(465牛),AxyaLoop生物可吸收锚钉3毫米(143牛)、5毫米(395牛)和6.5毫米(369牛),ParaFix钛质锚钉3毫米(335牛)、5毫米(485牛)和6.5毫米(465牛),ParaSorb生物锚钉3毫米(143牛)、5.5毫米(395牛)和6.5毫米(369牛),以及Bio-Corkscrew FT(260牛)。所有缝线均在远离夹具的测试线股中点处断裂。2号Orthocord的平均缝线强度为92牛;2号Ultrabraid共编织和白色的强度分别为265牛和280牛;2号Force Fiber的强度为289牛,2号Hi-Fi的强度为250牛,2号MagnumWire的强度为303牛,2号Maxbraid Polyethylene Plus的强度为256牛。

结论

与编织聚酯缝线相比,新型缝线产品在断裂载荷值方面有显著提高。金属锚钉与生物可降解锚钉以及螺旋型与非螺旋型设计相比,断裂载荷值仍然更高。

临床意义

偏好更强缝线的外科医生现在有几种高强度缝线可供选择。大多数测试的新型锚钉表现良好。

相似文献

1
Sutures and suture anchors--update 2006.缝线与缝线锚钉——2006年更新
Arthroscopy. 2006 Oct;22(10):1063.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.106.
2
Suture anchor materials, eyelets, and designs: update 2008.缝线锚钉材料、小孔及设计:2008年更新
Arthroscopy. 2008 Aug;24(8):859-67. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 May 9.
3
Cyclic load testing of biodegradable suture anchors containing 2 high-strength sutures.含2根高强度缝线的可生物降解缝合锚钉的循环载荷测试
Arthroscopy. 2007 Apr;23(4):355-60. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.12.009.
4
Sutures and suture anchors: update 2003.缝线与缝线锚钉:2003年更新
Arthroscopy. 2003 Nov;19(9):985-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.09.018.
5
Mechanical and handling properties of braided polyblend polyethylene sutures in comparison to braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures.与编织聚酯和单丝聚二氧六环酮缝线相比,编织聚混物聚乙烯缝线的机械性能和操作性能
Arthroscopy. 2006 Nov;22(11):1146-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.06.013.
6
Biomechanical analysis of pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2011 update.肩袖和关节盂锚定物拔出强度的生物力学分析:2011 年更新。
Arthroscopy. 2011 Jul;27(7):895-905. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.02.016.
7
The properties of damaged and undamaged suture used in metal and bioabsorbable anchors: an in vitro study.金属和生物可吸收锚钉中使用的受损和未受损缝线的特性:一项体外研究。
Arthroscopy. 2007 Jun;23(6):655-61. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.01.008.
8
Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair.肩袖重建的循环加载:改良缝线构型的单排修复与双排修复对比
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):1504-10. doi: 10.1177/0363546508314424. Epub 2008 Feb 22.
9
Suture strength and angle of load application in a suture anchor eyelet.缝线锚钉小孔中的缝线强度及负荷施加角度。
Arthroscopy. 2005 Dec;21(12):1447-51. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.09.003.
10
Cyclic load and failure behavior of arthroscopic knots and high strength sutures.关节镜结和高强度缝线的循环载荷与失效行为
Arthroscopy. 2009 Feb;25(2):192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.010. Epub 2008 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of suture anchor type, eyelet configuration, and loading condition on suture failure: An in vitro study.缝线锚钉类型、小孔构造及加载条件对缝线失效的影响:一项体外研究。
Vet Surg. 2025 Aug;54(6):1229-1238. doi: 10.1111/vsu.14231. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
2
Attaching artificial Achilles and tibialis cranialis tendons to bone using suture anchors in a rabbit model: assessment of outcomes.在兔模型中使用缝线锚钉将人工跟腱和胫骨前肌腱附着于骨:结果评估
PeerJ. 2025 Jan 21;13:e18756. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18756. eCollection 2025.
3
A Dynamic, Self-Tensioning Suture Contracts in Saline to Counteract Changes in Loop Length From Cyclic Loading.
一种动态自张紧缝线在盐水中收缩,以抵消循环加载引起的环长度变化。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 May 29;6(4):100872. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100872. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Effect of cyclic loading on the ultimate tensile strength of small metallic suture anchors used for attaching artificial tendons in rabbits.循环加载对用于在兔体内连接人工肌腱的小型金属缝合锚钉极限拉伸强度的影响。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 9:2024.06.08.597378. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.08.597378.
5
UHMWPE suture induced pseudotumor following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A case report.关节镜下肩袖修复术后超高分子量聚乙烯缝线诱发的假肿瘤:一例报告。
Shoulder Elbow. 2023 Nov;15(4 Suppl):87-91. doi: 10.1177/17585732211067117. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
6
Biomechanical comparison of different suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair surgery-all-suture anchors are equivalent to other suture anchors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.肩袖修复手术中使用的不同缝线锚钉的生物力学比较——全缝线锚钉与其他缝线锚钉等效:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析
J Exp Orthop. 2023 Apr 17;10(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00608-w.
7
Non-suppurative Tissue Reaction to Polyether Ether Ketone Anchor in Rotator Cuff Repair.聚醚醚酮锚钉在肩袖修复中引起的非化脓性组织反应
J Orthop Case Rep. 2022 Aug;12(8):47-52. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2022.v12.i08.2960.
8
Managing acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation during COVID 19 pandemic by minimally invasive technique with suture anchor and miniplate: A pilot study.在新冠疫情期间采用带缝线锚钉和微型钢板的微创技术治疗急性肩锁关节脱位:一项初步研究
Med J Armed Forces India. 2022 Aug 18;79(Suppl 1):S217-23. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2022.06.016.
9
Post-Traumatic Hallux Valgus: A Modified Surgical Technique.创伤后拇外翻:一种改良手术技术。
Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Dec 20;11(1):e37-e42. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2021.08.032. eCollection 2022 Jan.
10
The Evolution of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.关节镜下肩袖修复术的发展历程
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Dec 6;9(12):23259671211050899. doi: 10.1177/23259671211050899. eCollection 2021 Dec.