Gort Marjan, Broekhuis Manda, Otter Renée, Klazinga Niek S
Faculty of Management and Organization, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Apr;102(2):219-26. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9327-4. Epub 2006 Oct 7.
To identify actionable elements for improving best practice, this study examined the relative effects of patient, surgeon and hospital factors on surgical treatment variation of 2,929 early breast cancer patients, diagnosed from January 1998 to January 2002 in the region of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre North-Netherlands. Multilevel logistic regression was used to analyze the hierarchically structured data. Apart from the patient level, 43.3% of the treatment variation was due to the hospital and 56.7% to the surgeon, after adjustment for patient characteristics. Although hospital factors like volume, teaching status, and management and policy contributed to this variation, multidisciplinary care seemed the most important actionable hospital factor. Although the surgeon was shown to be an important starting point for quality improvement, actionable elements seemed difficult to identify as factors like surgeon experience and volume were not conclusive and significant variance on this level remained (sigma2 = 0.149, SE 0.053). We conclude that multidisciplinary care can improve best practice and that further research into actionable surgeon factors is needed.
为了确定改善最佳实践的可操作因素,本研究调查了患者、外科医生和医院因素对2929例早期乳腺癌患者手术治疗差异的相对影响,这些患者于1998年1月至2002年1月在北荷兰综合癌症中心地区被诊断。采用多水平逻辑回归分析分层结构数据。除患者层面外,在调整患者特征后,43.3%的治疗差异归因于医院,56.7%归因于外科医生。尽管医院因素如规模、教学状况以及管理和政策导致了这种差异,但多学科护理似乎是最重要的可操作医院因素。尽管外科医生被证明是质量改进的重要起点,但由于外科医生经验和手术量等因素不具有决定性且该层面仍存在显著差异(σ2 = 0.149,标准误0.053),可操作因素似乎难以确定。我们得出结论,多学科护理可以改善最佳实践,并且需要进一步研究可操作的外科医生因素。