Yip Winnie, Subramanian S V, Mitchell Andrew D, Lee Dominic T S, Wang Jian, Kawachi Ichiro
Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jan;64(1):35-49. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.027. Epub 2006 Oct 9.
Despite increasing acknowledgement that social capital is an important determinant of health and overall well-being, empirical evidence regarding the direction and strength of these linkages in the developing world is limited and inconclusive. This paper empirically examines relationships between social capital and health and well-being-as well as the suitability of commonly used social capital measures-in rural China, where rapid economic growth coexists with gradual and fundamental social changes. To measure social capital, we adopt a structural/cognitive distinction, whereby structural social capital is measured by organizational membership and cognitive social capital is measured by a composite index of trust, reciprocity, and mutual help. Our outcome measures included self-reported general health, psychological health, and subjective well-being. We adopt multi-level estimation methods to account for our conceptualization of social capital as both an individual- and contextual-level resource. Results indicate that cognitive social capital (i.e., trust) is positively associated with all three outcome measures at the individual level and psychological health/subjective well-being at the village level as well. We further find that trust affects health and well-being through pathways of social network and support. In contrast, there is little statistical association or consistent pattern between structural social capital (organizational membership) and the outcome variables. Furthermore, although organizational membership is highly correlated with collective action, neither is associated with health or well-being. Our results suggest that policies aimed at producing an environment that enhances social networks and facilitates the exchange of social support hold promise for improving the health and well-being of the rural Chinese population. In addition, China may not have fully taken advantage of the potential contribution of structural social capital in advancing health and well-being. A redirection of collective action from economic to social activities may be worth considering.
尽管人们越来越认识到社会资本是健康和总体幸福感的重要决定因素,但关于发展中世界这些联系的方向和强度的实证证据有限且尚无定论。本文实证研究了中国农村地区社会资本与健康及幸福感之间的关系,以及常用社会资本衡量指标的适用性,在中国农村,经济快速增长与渐进且根本的社会变革并存。为衡量社会资本,我们采用了结构/认知区分法,即结构社会资本通过组织成员身份来衡量,认知社会资本通过信任、互惠和互助的综合指数来衡量。我们的结果指标包括自我报告的总体健康、心理健康和主观幸福感。我们采用多层次估计方法,以考虑我们将社会资本概念化为个体层面和情境层面资源的情况。结果表明,认知社会资本(即信任)在个体层面与所有三个结果指标呈正相关,在村庄层面与心理健康/主观幸福感也呈正相关。我们进一步发现,信任通过社会网络和支持途径影响健康和幸福感。相比之下,结构社会资本(组织成员身份)与结果变量之间几乎没有统计关联或一致模式。此外,尽管组织成员身份与集体行动高度相关,但两者均与健康或幸福感无关。我们的结果表明,旨在营造增强社会网络并促进社会支持交流环境的政策有望改善中国农村人口的健康和幸福感。此外,中国可能尚未充分利用结构社会资本在促进健康和幸福感方面的潜在贡献。将集体行动从经济活动转向社会活动可能值得考虑。