Flammang Ann M, Kendall David M, Baumgartner C John, Slagle Trish D, Choe Yong S
Ross Products Division of Abbott, 3300 Stelzer Rd, Columbus, OH 43219-3034, USA.
J Am Coll Nutr. 2006 Oct;25(5):409-14. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2006.10719553.
To compare the effect of an experimental viscous fiber (VF) crispy bar on the postprandial glucose, insulin, and C-peptide response in adult subjects with type 2 diabetes to two commercially available control crispy bars.
The study was a randomized, double-blinded, three period, crossover study.
The study was conducted at two sites: Park Nicollet Institute, International Diabetes Center, Minneapolis, MN, and Radiant Research, Inc., Minneapolis, MN.
A total of 60 adults with type 2 diabetes taking oral antihyperglycemic medication participated in the study.
After an overnight fast, subjects consumed a test meal containing an equicaloric amount (300 kcal) of an experimental VF crispy bar or one of two commercially available crispy bars at each of three test visits, followed by a four hour meal tolerance test. Subjects also completed gastrointestinal (GI) response records for the 24 hours following each test visit.
The VF crispy bars produced significantly lower glucose (p < 0.0001), insulin (p < 0.0001), and C-peptide (p < 0.0001) responses (as measured by positive area under the curve) in subjects with type 2 diabetes, as compared with the two commercially available bars. Intensity (p < 0.05) and frequency (p < 0.05) of flatulence were significantly higher with the VF bar as compared with the 2 commercial bars. While the VF bar produced significant subjective GI tolerance scoring values, the mean value was below 3 on a scale of 0 (no effect) to 10 (most severe effect) for all tested materials.
The incorporation of VF into a crispy bar provided a means to improve blood glucose levels by reducing postprandial glucose, insulin, and C-peptide responses in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Though associated with some GI symptoms, VF may have application in improving the postprandial glycemic response in people with diabetes attempting intensive glucose control.
比较一种实验性粘性纤维(VF)脆棒对2型糖尿病成年受试者餐后血糖、胰岛素和C肽反应的影响,并与两种市售对照脆棒进行对比。
该研究为随机、双盲、三阶段交叉研究。
研究在两个地点进行:明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市的帕克尼科莱特研究所国际糖尿病中心,以及明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市的辐射研究公司。
共有60名服用口服降糖药的2型糖尿病成年患者参与了该研究。
经过一夜禁食后,受试者在三次测试访视中的每一次,都食用了一份含有等量热量(300千卡)的实验性VF脆棒或两种市售脆棒中的一种的测试餐,随后进行四小时的餐耐量试验。受试者还在每次测试访视后的24小时内完成了胃肠道(GI)反应记录。
与两种市售脆棒相比,VF脆棒使2型糖尿病受试者的血糖(p < 0.0001)、胰岛素(p < 0.0001)和C肽(p < 0.0001)反应(通过曲线下正面积测量)显著降低。与两种市售脆棒相比,VF脆棒导致的肠胃胀气强度(p < 0.05)和频率(p < 0.05)显著更高。虽然VF脆棒产生了显著的主观胃肠道耐受性评分值,但对于所有测试材料,平均值在0(无影响)至10(最严重影响)的量表上低于3。
将VF加入脆棒中提供了一种通过降低2型糖尿病受试者的餐后血糖、胰岛素和C肽反应来改善血糖水平的方法。尽管与一些胃肠道症状有关,但VF可能在改善试图强化血糖控制的糖尿病患者的餐后血糖反应方面有应用价值。