Carey Kate B, Carey Michael P, Maisto Stephen A, Henson James M
Center for Health and Behavior, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-2340, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Oct;74(5):943-54. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.943.
In this randomized controlled trial, the authors evaluated brief motivational interventions (BMIs) for at-risk college drinkers. Heavy drinking students (N = 509; 65% women, 35% men) were randomized into 1 of 6 intervention conditions formed by crossing the baseline Timeline Followback (TLFB) interview (present versus absent) and intervention type (basic BMI, BMI enhanced with a decisional balance module, or none). Assessments completed at baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months measured typical and risky drinking as well as drinking-related problems. Relative to controls, the TLFB interview reduced consumption but not problems at 1 month. The basic BMI improved all drinking outcomes beyond the effects of the TLFB interview at 1 month, whereas the enhanced BMI did not. Risk reduction achieved by brief interventions maintained throughout the follow-up year.
在这项随机对照试验中,作者评估了针对有风险的大学生饮酒者的简短动机干预(BMI)。重度饮酒的学生(N = 509;65%为女性,35%为男性)被随机分为由基线时间线随访(TLFB)访谈(有或无)与干预类型(基本BMI、通过决策平衡模块增强的BMI或无干预)交叉形成的6种干预条件之一。在基线、1个月、6个月和12个月时完成的评估测量了典型饮酒和危险饮酒以及与饮酒相关的问题。与对照组相比,TLFB访谈在1个月时减少了饮酒量,但没有减少相关问题。基本BMI在1个月时改善了所有饮酒结果,超出了TLFB访谈的效果,而增强版BMI则没有。简短干预实现的风险降低在整个随访年度内得以维持。