• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对大学生进行简短的动机和家长干预:一项随机析因研究。

Brief motivational and parent interventions for college students: a randomized factorial study.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881-0808, USA.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Jun;78(3):349-61. doi: 10.1037/a0019166.

DOI:10.1037/a0019166
PMID:20515210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2880835/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Using a randomized factorial design, we examined the efficacy of a brief motivational intervention (BMI) and a parent-based intervention (PBI) as universal preventive interventions to reduce alcohol use among incoming college students.

METHOD

Participants (N = 1,014) were assessed prior to matriculation and at 10 months and 22 months postbaseline. Two-part latent growth modeling was used to simultaneously examine initiation and growth in heavy episodic drinking and alcohol-related consequences.

RESULTS

This study retained 90.8% (n = 921) of randomized students at the 10-month follow-up and 84.0% (n = 852) of randomized students at the 22-month follow-up. BMI participants were significantly less likely than non-BMI participants to initiate heavy episodic drinking and to begin experiencing alcohol-related consequences. Effect sizes were minimal at 10 months (Cohen's h ranged from 0.02 to 0.07) and were small at 22 months (hs ranged from 0.15 to 0.22). A significant BMI x PBI interaction revealed that students receiving both the BMI and the PBI were significantly less likely to report the onset of consequences beyond the sum of the individual intervention effects (h = 0.08 at 10 months, and h = 0.21 at 22 months). Hypothesized direct BMI effects for reductions in heavy episodic drinking and consequences were not observed. Significant mediated effects via changes in descriptive norms were present for both growth and initiation of heavy episodic drinking and consequences.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, the current study is the first to provide support for BMI as a universal preventive intervention for incoming college students. Although hypothesized PBI main effects were not found, mediation analyses suggest future refinements could enhance PBI effectiveness.

摘要

目的

采用随机因子设计,我们检验了简短动机干预(BMI)和基于家长的干预(PBI)作为通用预防干预措施,以减少即将进入大学的学生的饮酒量的效果。

方法

参与者(N=1014)在入学前和基线后 10 个月和 22 个月进行评估。双部分潜在增长模型用于同时检查重度间歇性饮酒和与酒精相关后果的起始和增长。

结果

本研究保留了 90.8%(n=921)在 10 个月随访时和 84.0%(n=852)在 22 个月随访时随机分配的学生。与非 BMI 参与者相比,BMI 参与者开始重度间歇性饮酒和开始出现与酒精相关的后果的可能性较小。10 个月时的效应大小较小(Cohen's h 范围为 0.02 至 0.07),22 个月时的效应大小较小(hs 范围为 0.15 至 0.22)。BMI x PBI 的交互作用显著表明,接受 BMI 和 PBI 的学生报告后果的发生明显低于单独干预效果的总和(10 个月时 h=0.08,22 个月时 h=0.21)。未观察到假设的 BMI 对减少重度间歇性饮酒和后果的直接影响。在重度间歇性饮酒和后果的起始和增长方面,描述性规范变化的中介效应显著。

结论

据我们所知,本研究首次为 BMI 作为即将进入大学的学生的通用预防干预措施提供了支持。虽然没有发现假设的 PBI 主要效果,但中介分析表明,未来的改进可以提高 PBI 的有效性。

相似文献

1
Brief motivational and parent interventions for college students: a randomized factorial study.对大学生进行简短的动机和家长干预:一项随机析因研究。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Jun;78(3):349-61. doi: 10.1037/a0019166.
2
Randomized trials of alcohol-use interventions with college students and their parents: lessons from the Transitions Project.大学生及其父母的酒精使用干预措施的随机试验:来自“过渡项目”的经验教训。
Clin Trials. 2011 Apr;8(2):205-13. doi: 10.1177/1740774510396387. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
3
A randomized trial of a parent-based intervention on drinking behavior among incoming college freshmen.一项针对即将入学的大学新生饮酒行为的基于家长的干预措施的随机试验。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl. 2009 Jul(16):67-76. doi: 10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.67.
4
Brief motivational intervention and alcohol expectancy challenge with heavy drinking college students: a randomized factorial study.针对酗酒大学生的简短动机干预与酒精预期挑战:一项随机析因研究。
Addict Behav. 2007 Nov;32(11):2509-28. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.06.018. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
5
Is brief motivational intervention effective in reducing alcohol use among young men voluntarily receiving it? A randomized controlled trial.简短动机性干预对自愿接受干预的年轻男性饮酒行为的影响:一项随机对照试验
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011 Oct;35(10):1822-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01526.x. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
6
Age of drinking onset as a moderator of the efficacy of parent-based, brief motivational, and combined intervention approaches to reduce drinking and consequences among college students.饮酒起始年龄作为一种调节因素,影响着基于父母的、简短动机性的和联合干预方法对减少大学生饮酒和相关后果的效果。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010 Jul;34(7):1154-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01192.x. Epub 2010 May 7.
7
Prospective protective effect of parents on peer influences and college alcohol involvement.父母对同伴影响和大学生饮酒卷入的前瞻性保护作用。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Mar;26(1):30-41. doi: 10.1037/a0023879. Epub 2011 May 16.
8
Incident-specific and individual-level moderators of brief intervention effects with mandated college students.与被强制要求参加的大学生相关的特定事件和个体层面的简短干预效果的调节变量。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2011 Dec;25(4):616-24. doi: 10.1037/a0024508. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
9
Using e-mail boosters to maintain change after brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students: A randomized controlled trial.利用电子邮件助推器在针对强制大学生的简短酒精干预后维持改变:一项随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Sep;86(9):787-798. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000339.
10
Moderation of a parent-based intervention on transitions in drinking: examining the role of normative perceptions and attitudes among high- and low-risk first-year college students.基于父母的干预对饮酒转变的调节作用:在高风险和低风险的大一学生中检验规范认知和态度的作用。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013 Sep;37(9):1587-94. doi: 10.1111/acer.12126. Epub 2013 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Family Intervention Models for Young Adults with Substance Abuse: A Systematic Review.针对有药物滥用问题的年轻人的家庭干预模式:一项系统综述。
Indian J Psychol Med. 2024 Jun 5:02537176241246042. doi: 10.1177/02537176241246042.
2
A randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of the eCHECKUP TO GO on drinking games participation and behavior among high school seniors.一项测试 eCHECKUP TO GO 对高中生饮酒游戏参与度和行为影响的随机对照试验。
Addict Behav. 2025 Jan;160:108183. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108183. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
3
Effects of the FITSTART + PBI on drinking and negative alcohol-related consequences during the first year of college.

本文引用的文献

1
An Alternative Framework for Defining Mediation.定义调解的另一种框架。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1998 Apr 1;33(2):295-312. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_5.
2
Universal intervention effects on substance use among young adults mediated by delayed adolescent substance initiation.普遍干预措施对青少年延迟物质使用的影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Aug;77(4):620-32. doi: 10.1037/a0016029.
3
A randomized trial of a parent-based intervention on drinking behavior among incoming college freshmen.一项针对即将入学的大学新生饮酒行为的基于家长的干预措施的随机试验。
FITSTART + PBI对大学一年级学生饮酒及与酒精相关的负面后果的影响。
J Am Coll Health. 2024 Jan 16:1-13. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2023.2299418.
4
Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.动机性访谈减少物质使用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 12;12(12):CD008063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008063.pub3.
5
Do as I Say, Not as You Perceive: Examining the Roles of Perceived Parental Knowledge and Perceived Parental Approval in College Students' Alcohol-Related Approval and Behavior.照我说的做,而非照你所理解的做:探究父母认知度和父母认可度在大学生酒精相关认可及行为中的作用
Parent Sci Pract. 2013;13(3):196-212. doi: 10.1080/15295192.2013.756356. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
6
Which is Better for Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of Zero-Inflated Count Outcomes, One-Step or Two-Step Analysis? A Simulation Study.零膨胀计数结局的个体参与者数据荟萃分析中,一步法和两步法哪个更好?一项模拟研究。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2023 Nov-Dec;58(6):1090-1105. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2023.2173135. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
7
Taking alcohol from one's parents' home without permission as a risk factor for greater alcohol and marijuana use during the transition into college.未经父母允许从家里拿酒,这是进入大学后酒精和大麻使用量增加的一个风险因素。
Addict Behav. 2023 Feb;137:107502. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107502. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
8
Brief Alcohol Interventions are Effective through 6 Months: Findings from Marginalized Zero-inflated Poisson and Negative Binomial Models in a Two-step IPD Meta-analysis.边缘零膨胀泊松和负二项模型两步 IPD 荟萃分析发现,短期酒精干预在 6 个月内有效。
Prev Sci. 2023 Nov;24(8):1608-1621. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01420-1. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
9
Evaluating Non-response Bias in a Parent-Based College Alcohol Intervention.评估基于家长的大学生酒精干预中的无回应偏差。
Subst Use Misuse. 2022;57(8):1287-1293. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2077377. Epub 2022 May 27.
10
A Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Meta-analytic Mediation Analysis Using Individual Participant Data: Testing Protective Behavioral Strategies as a Mediator of Brief Motivational Intervention Effects on Alcohol-Related Problems.使用个体参与者数据进行元分析中介分析的结构方程建模方法:检验保护性行为策略作为短期动机干预对酒精相关问题影响的中介。
Prev Sci. 2022 Apr;23(3):390-402. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01318-4. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl. 2009 Jul(16):67-76. doi: 10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.67.
4
Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24, 1998-2005.1998 - 2005年美国18 - 24岁大学生中与酒精相关的死亡率和发病率的规模及趋势。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl. 2009 Jul(16):12-20. doi: 10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.12.
5
A randomized clinical trial evaluating a combined alcohol intervention for high-risk college students.一项评估针对高危大学生的联合酒精干预措施的随机临床试验。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009 Jul;70(4):555-67. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.555.
6
Mechanisms of change in motivational interviewing: a review and preliminary evaluation of the evidence.动机性访谈中的改变机制:证据综述与初步评估
Addiction. 2009 May;104(5):705-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02527.x.
7
Dismantling motivational interviewing and feedback for college drinkers: a randomized clinical trial.针对大学生饮酒者拆解动机性访谈与反馈:一项随机临床试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Feb;77(1):64-73. doi: 10.1037/a0014472.
8
How important are parents during the college years? A longitudinal perspective of indirect influences parents yield on their college teens' alcohol use.在大学期间,父母有多重要?从纵向角度看父母对其处于大学阶段的孩子饮酒行为产生的间接影响。
Addict Behav. 2008 Oct;33(10):1360-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.06.010. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
9
Preventive interventions addressing underage drinking: state of the evidence and steps toward public health impact.针对未成年人饮酒的预防性干预措施:证据现状及实现公共卫生影响的步骤。
Pediatrics. 2008 Apr;121 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S311-36. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2243E.
10
Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: program PRODCLIN.间接效应的乘积置信区间分布:程序PRODCLIN。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):384-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03193007.