• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

酗酒中真正重要的因素:大学生酗酒心理决定因素的优势分析

What really matters in binge drinking: A dominance analysis of binge drinking psychological determinants among University students.

作者信息

Mange Jessica, Mauduy Maxime, Sénémeaud Cécile, Bagneux Virginie, Cabé Nicolas, Jacquet Denis, Leconte Pascale, Margas Nicolas, Mauny Nicolas, Ritz Ludivine, Gierski Fabien, Beaunieux Hélène

机构信息

Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, LPCN, 14000 Caen, France.

Service d'Addictologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France.

出版信息

Addict Behav Rep. 2021 Apr 8;13:100346. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2021.100346. eCollection 2021 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.abrep.2021.100346
PMID:33997251
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8090991/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Binge drinking (BD) is a public health concern, especially in young people. Multiple individual factors referring to different level of analyses - positional, inter-individual and intra-individual - are associated to BD. As they have mainly been explored separately, little is known about the psychological variables most associated with BD. This study, based on an integrative model considering a large number of variables, aims to estimate these associations and possible dominance of some variables in BD.

METHODS

A sample of university students ( = 2851) participated in an internet survey-based study. They provided information on alcohol related variables (AUDIT, BD score), positional factors (sex, age), inter-individual factors (subjective norm, social identity, external motivations), and intra-individual factors (internal motivations, -cognitions, impulsivity and personality traits). The data were processed via a backward regression analysis including all variables and completed with a dominance analysis on variables that are significantly associated with BD intensity.

RESULTS

The strongest variables associated with BD intensity were enhancement motives and drinking identity (average Δ  = 21.81%), followed by alcohol subjective norm and social motives (average Δ  = 13.99%). Other associated variables (average Δ  = 2,84%) were negative metacognition on uncontrollability, sex, coping motives, lack of premeditation, positive metacognition on cognitive self-regulation, positive urgency, lack of perseverance, age, conformity motives and loneliness.

CONCLUSION

Results offer new avenues at the empirical level, by spotting particularly inter-individual psychological variables that should be more thoroughly explored, but also at the clinical level, to elaborate new prevention strategies focusing on these specific factors.

摘要

引言

暴饮(BD)是一个公共卫生问题,在年轻人中尤为突出。涉及不同分析层面——位置层面、个体间层面和个体内层面——的多个个体因素与暴饮有关。由于这些因素主要是被分别研究的,所以对于与暴饮最相关的心理变量知之甚少。本研究基于一个考虑大量变量的综合模型,旨在评估这些关联以及某些变量在暴饮中的可能主导作用。

方法

一组大学生样本(n = 2851)参与了一项基于网络调查的研究。他们提供了与酒精相关的变量(酒精使用障碍识别测试、暴饮得分)、位置因素(性别、年龄)、个体间因素(主观规范、社会认同、外部动机)以及个体内因素(内部动机、元认知、冲动性和人格特质)的信息。数据通过包含所有变量的向后回归分析进行处理,并对与暴饮强度显著相关的变量进行主导分析。

结果

与暴饮强度最相关的变量是增强动机和饮酒认同(平均ΔR² = 21.81%),其次是酒精主观规范和社交动机(平均ΔR² = 13.99%)。其他相关变量(平均ΔR² = 2.84%)包括对不可控性的负面元认知、性别、应对动机、缺乏预谋、对认知自我调节的正面元认知、积极紧迫性、缺乏毅力、年龄、从众动机和孤独感。

结论

研究结果在实证层面提供了新的途径,通过找出那些应更深入探究的个体间心理变量,同时在临床层面也为制定针对这些特定因素的新预防策略提供了依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c82/8090991/eb95903486b7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c82/8090991/a26856867155/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c82/8090991/e0f168f7b072/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c82/8090991/eb95903486b7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c82/8090991/a26856867155/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c82/8090991/e0f168f7b072/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c82/8090991/eb95903486b7/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
What really matters in binge drinking: A dominance analysis of binge drinking psychological determinants among University students.酗酒中真正重要的因素:大学生酗酒心理决定因素的优势分析
Addict Behav Rep. 2021 Apr 8;13:100346. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2021.100346. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Alcohol attitudes, motives, norms, and personality traits longitudinally classify nondrinkers, moderate drinkers, and binge drinkers using discriminant function analysis.使用判别函数分析,从饮酒态度、动机、规范和人格特质方面对不饮酒者、适度饮酒者和暴饮者进行纵向分类。
Addict Behav. 2016 Oct;61:91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 10.
3
Impulsivity and drinking motives predict problem behaviours relating to alcohol use in university students.冲动性和饮酒动机可预测大学生与酒精使用相关的问题行为。
Addict Behav. 2014 Jan;39(1):289-96. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.024. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
4
Consequences, Motives, and Expectancies of Consumption as Predictors of Binge Drinking in University Women.作为大学女生酗酒预测因素的消费后果、动机和预期
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 5;13:862334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862334. eCollection 2022.
5
Mediational relations of substance use risk profiles, alcohol-related outcomes, and drinking motives among young adolescents in the Netherlands.荷兰青少年物质使用风险概况、与酒精相关的结果和饮酒动机的中介关系。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Dec 1;133(2):571-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.07.030. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
6
Binging at the campus: Motivations and impulsivity influence binge drinking profiles in university students.校园狂欢:动机和冲动性对大学生狂欢饮酒模式的影响。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Apr;250:146-154. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.068. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
7
Social motives for drinking in students should not be neglected in efforts to decrease problematic drinking.在努力减少问题性饮酒时,不应忽视学生饮酒的社交动机。
Health Educ Res. 2013 Aug;28(4):640-50. doi: 10.1093/her/cyt036. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
8
Drinking motives as mediators of the impulsivity-substance use relation: pathways for negative urgency, lack of premeditation, and sensation seeking.饮酒动机在冲动性与物质使用之间的中介作用:负性冲动、缺乏深思熟虑和寻求感觉的途径。
Addict Behav. 2012 Jul;37(7):848-55. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.03.016. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
9
Enhancement motivation to drink predicts binge drinking in adolescence: a longitudinal study in a community sample.增强饮酒动机可预测青少年 binge drinking:一项社区样本的纵向研究。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019;45(3):304-312. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2018.1550089. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
10
Context matters: Student-perceived binge drinking norms at faculty-level relate to binge drinking behavior in higher education.背景很重要:学生所感知的教师层面的酗酒规范与高等教育中的酗酒行为有关。
Addict Behav. 2016 Aug;59:89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of alcohol use disorder risk in young adults: Direct and indirect psychological paths through binge drinking.年轻成年人酒精使用障碍风险的预测因素:通过暴饮的直接和间接心理路径
PLoS One. 2025 May 9;20(5):e0321974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321974. eCollection 2025.
2
A prevention program for binge drinking among students based on mindfulness and implementation intention (ALCOMEDIIT): a randomized controlled trial.基于正念和实施意向的学生 binge drinking 预防计划(ALCOMEDIIT):一项随机对照试验。
Trials. 2024 Jan 2;25(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07887-9.
3
French validation of the Compensatory Eating and Behaviors in Response to Alcohol Consumption Scale (CEBRACS) in a university student sample.

本文引用的文献

1
What We Talk About When We Talk About Binge Drinking: Towards an Integrated Conceptualization and Evaluation.当我们谈论 binge drinking 时我们在谈论什么:迈向综合概念化和评估。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2020 Aug 14;55(5):468-479. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agaa041.
2
Distinct psychological profiles among college students with substance use: A cluster analytic approach.有物质使用问题的大学生的不同心理特征:一种聚类分析方法。
Addict Behav. 2020 Oct;109:106477. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106477. Epub 2020 May 21.
3
NIAAA's College Alcohol Intervention Matrix.
在大学生样本中对 Compensatory Eating and Behaviors in Response to Alcohol Consumption Scale(CEBRACS)进行法语验证。
Eat Weight Disord. 2023 Nov 10;28(1):95. doi: 10.1007/s40519-023-01622-8.
4
The nomological network of drinker identity: A scoping review.饮酒者身份的规律网络:范围综述。
Addict Behav. 2023 Jun;141:107654. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107654. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
5
Binge behaviors: Assessment, determinants, and consequences.暴饮暴食行为:评估、决定因素及后果
Addict Behav Rep. 2021 Sep 29;14:100380. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2021.100380. eCollection 2021 Dec.
美国国家酒精滥用与酒精中毒研究所的大学酒精干预矩阵。
Alcohol Res. 2018;39(1):43-47.
4
Effects of the social norms intervention on norm perceptions, binge drinking and alcohol-related harms: A cluster-randomised controlled trial.社会规范干预对规范认知、狂饮及酒精相关危害的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Oct 28;12:304-311. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.019. eCollection 2018 Dec.
5
Implicit and explicit drinker identities interactively predict in-the-moment alcohol placebo consumption.隐性和显性饮酒者身份交互预测即时酒精安慰剂消费。
Addict Behav Rep. 2016 Apr 16;3:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2016.04.002. eCollection 2016 Jun.
6
Binging at the campus: Motivations and impulsivity influence binge drinking profiles in university students.校园狂欢:动机和冲动性对大学生狂欢饮酒模式的影响。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Apr;250:146-154. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.068. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
7
Short and Sweet: The Persuasive Effects of Message Framing and Temporal Context in Antismoking Warning Labels.简明扼要:反吸烟警示标签中信息框架和时间背景的说服效果
J Health Commun. 2017 Jan;22(1):20-28. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1247484. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
8
Not the same old thing: Establishing the unique contribution of drinking identity as a predictor of alcohol consumption and problems over time.并非老一套:随着时间的推移,确立饮酒身份的独特贡献作为预测饮酒和问题的指标。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2016 Sep;30(6):659-671. doi: 10.1037/adb0000195. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
9
Being lonely or using substances with friends? A cross-sectional study of Hungarian adolescents' health risk behaviours.是感到孤独还是与朋友一起使用药物?一项关于匈牙利青少年健康风险行为的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Nov 7;15:1107. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2474-y.
10
Age-varying associations between substance use behaviors and depressive symptoms during adolescence and young adulthood.青春期和青年期物质使用行为与抑郁症状之间随年龄变化的关联。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Dec 1;157:75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Oct 9.