Suppr超能文献

肉鸡、火鸡和北京鸭氨基酸消化率的比较。

Comparison of amino acid digestibility in broiler chickens, turkeys, and Pekin ducks.

作者信息

Kluth H, Rodehutscord M

机构信息

Institut für Ernährungswissenschaften, Universität Halle-Wittenberg, 06099 Germany.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 2006 Nov;85(11):1953-60. doi: 10.1093/ps/85.11.1953.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare prececal amino acid (AA) digestibilities in broilers, turkeys, and Pekin ducks that were 3 wk old. Five diets were used: a basal diet and diets that contained either soybean meal (SBM) or rapeseed meal (RSM) at the expense of starch each at either 150 or 300 g/kg. The differences in dietary CP and AA concentrations resulted only from the inclusion of SBM or RSM. Titanium dioxide was used as an indigestible marker. Each diet was allocated to 6 pens of 12 birds from each species and provided ad libitum for 1 wk starting at 14 d of age. Digesta were sampled on a pen basis from the distal two-thirds of the section between Meckel's diverticulum and 2 cm anterior to the ileocecocolonic junction. Ingested and digested amounts of AA were determined for each pen. Digestibilities for the 2 meals were then determined by a multiple linear regression analysis, which makes a correction for basal endogenous AA losses unnecessary. Digestibilities for essential AA from the meals varied between 92% (Met, RSM, broilers) and 62% (Val, RSM, ducks). Digestibilities were not significantly different between SBM and RSM for broilers and turkeys, but the average digestibility across all AA was slightly higher for SBM and lower for RSM in turkeys than in broilers. Digestibilities were lower in ducks than in the 2 other species, and significant differences between SBM and RSM were detected for some AA in ducks. Amino acid digestibility ranking was very similar between broilers and turkeys but different for the 2 meals. It was concluded that differences among species cannot be explained by differences in basal endogenous AA losses among species. Amino acid digestibilities determined with broilers should not be used in formulating feed for ducks.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较3周龄肉鸡、火鸡和北京鸭盲肠前氨基酸(AA)消化率。使用了五种日粮:一种基础日粮以及分别以150或300 g/kg的淀粉替代量包含豆粕(SBM)或菜籽粕(RSM)的日粮。日粮粗蛋白(CP)和AA浓度的差异仅源于SBM或RSM的添加。二氧化钛用作不可消化标记物。每种日粮分配给来自每个品种的6个栏,每个栏12只鸟,从14日龄开始随意采食1周。从回肠憩室和回盲结肠交界处前方2 cm之间的后三分之二段按栏采集食糜。测定每个栏摄入和消化的AA量。然后通过多元线性回归分析确定两餐的消化率,无需对基础内源AA损失进行校正。餐中必需AA的消化率在92%(蛋氨酸,RSM,肉鸡)至62%(缬氨酸,RSM,鸭)之间变化。肉鸡和火鸡中SBM和RSM之间的消化率没有显著差异,但火鸡中所有AA的平均消化率SBM略高于RSM,低于肉鸡。鸭的消化率低于其他两个品种,鸭中一些AA在SBM和RSM之间检测到显著差异。肉鸡和火鸡之间氨基酸消化率排名非常相似,但两餐不同。得出的结论是,物种间的差异不能用物种间基础内源AA损失的差异来解释。用肉鸡测定的氨基酸消化率不应在鸭饲料配方中使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验