• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤中心有能力应对灾难吗?

Do trauma centers have the capacity to respond to disasters?

作者信息

Rivara Frederick P, Nathens Avery B, Jurkovich Gregory J, Maier Ronald V

机构信息

Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98104, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2006 Oct;61(4):949-53. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000219936.72483.6a.

DOI:10.1097/01.ta.0000219936.72483.6a
PMID:17033567
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Concern has been raised about the capacity of trauma centers to absorb large numbers of additional patients from mass casualty events. Our objective was to examine the capacity of current centers to handle an increased load from a mass casualty disaster.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of Level I and II trauma centers. They were contacted by mail and asked to respond to questions about their surge capacity as of July 4, 2005.

RESULTS

Data were obtained from 133 centers. On July 4, 2005 there were a median of 77 beds available in Level I and 84 in Level II trauma centers. Fifteen percent of the Level I and 12.2% of the Level II centers had a census at 95% capacity or greater. In the first 6 hours, each Level I center would be able to operate on 38 patients, while each Level II center would be able to operate on 22 patients. Based on available data, there are 10 trauma centers available to an average American within 60 minutes. Given the available bed capacity, a total of 812 beds would be available within a 60-minute transport distance in a mass casualty event.

CONCLUSIONS

There is capacity to care for the number of serious non-fatally injured patients resulting from the types of mass casualties recently experienced. If there is a further continued shift of uninsured patients to and fiscally driven closure of trauma centers, the surge capacity could be severely compromised.

摘要

背景

人们对创伤中心接收大量来自大规模伤亡事件的额外患者的能力表示担忧。我们的目标是检查当前中心处理大规模伤亡灾难增加负荷的能力。

方法

这是一项对一级和二级创伤中心的横断面研究。通过邮件联系这些中心,并要求它们回答有关截至2005年7月4日其应急能力的问题。

结果

从133个中心获得了数据。2005年7月4日,一级创伤中心的可用病床中位数为77张,二级创伤中心为84张。15%的一级中心和12.2%的二级中心的普查人数达到或超过95%的容量。在最初的6小时内,每个一级中心能够为38名患者进行手术,而每个二级中心能够为22名患者进行手术。根据现有数据,平均每个美国人在60分钟内可到达10个创伤中心。鉴于可用病床容量,在大规模伤亡事件中,60分钟运输距离内总共将有812张病床可用。

结论

有能力护理近期经历的大规模伤亡类型导致的严重非致命伤患者数量。如果无保险患者进一步持续转向创伤中心,且因财政原因导致创伤中心关闭,应急能力可能会受到严重影响。

相似文献

1
Do trauma centers have the capacity to respond to disasters?创伤中心有能力应对灾难吗?
J Trauma. 2006 Oct;61(4):949-53. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000219936.72483.6a.
2
Disaster metrics: quantitative benchmarking of hospital surge capacity in trauma-related multiple casualty events.灾难指标:创伤相关多人伤亡事件中医院应急能力的定量基准测试。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011 Jun;5(2):117-24. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2010.19. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
3
The dwindling supply of empty beds: implications for hospital surge capacity.空床供应的减少:对医院应急能力的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Nov-Dec;27(6):1688-94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1688.
4
A Geographic Simulation Model for the Treatment of Trauma Patients in Disasters.一种用于灾害中创伤患者治疗的地理模拟模型。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Aug;31(4):413-21. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000510. Epub 2016 May 25.
5
The impact of multiple casualty incidents on clinical outcomes.多重伤亡事件对临床结局的影响。
J Trauma. 2006 Nov;61(5):1036-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000231764.00067.54.
6
Predicting resource needs for multiple and mass casualty events in combat: lessons learned from combat support hospital experience in Operation Iraqi Freedom.预测战斗中多起大规模伤亡事件的资源需求:从伊拉克自由行动中战斗支援医院的经验中吸取的教训。
J Trauma. 2009 Apr;66(4 Suppl):S129-37. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819d85e7.
7
Alternate site surge capacity in times of public health disaster maintains trauma center and emergency department integrity: Hurricane Katrina.公共卫生灾难时期的备用地点应急能力可维持创伤中心和急诊科的完整性:卡特里娜飓风
J Trauma. 2007 Aug;63(2):253-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3180d0a70e.
8
Creation of inpatient capacity during a major hospital relocation: lessons for disaster planning.大型医院搬迁期间住院床位的设置:灾难规划的经验教训
Arch Surg. 2009 Sep;144(9):859-64. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.146.
9
The state of US trauma systems: public perceptions versus reality--implications for US response to terrorism and mass casualty events.美国创伤系统的现状:公众认知与现实——对美国应对恐怖主义和大规模伤亡事件的启示
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Dec;203(6):951-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.019.
10
The delivery of critical care services in US trauma centers: is the standard being met?美国创伤中心重症监护服务的提供:是否达到了标准?
J Trauma. 2006 Apr;60(4):773-83; disucssion 783-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196669.74076.50.

引用本文的文献

1
Surge Capacity and Mass Casualty Incidents Preparedness of Emergency Departments in a Metropolitan City: a Regional Survey Study.大都市急诊科的应急能力和大规模伤亡事件准备情况:一项区域性调查研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Aug 23;36(33):e210. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e210.
2
Impact of Superstorm Sandy on Medicare Patients' Utilization of Hospitals and Emergency Departments.超级风暴桑迪对医疗保险患者医院及急诊科利用情况的影响
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;18(6):1035-1041. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.7.34730. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
3
Utstein-style template for uniform data reporting of acute medical response in disasters.
用于灾难中急性医疗响应统一数据报告的Utstein式模板。
PLoS Curr. 2012 Mar 23;4:e4f6cf3e8df15a. doi: 10.1371/4f6cf3e8df15a.
4
Disaster preparedness of Canadian trauma centres: the perspective of medical directors of trauma.加拿大创伤中心的灾难准备:创伤医学主任的观点。
Can J Surg. 2011 Feb;54(1):9-16. doi: 10.1503/cjs.022909.
5
Evaluation of a CT triage protocol for mass casualty incidents: results from two large-scale exercises.大规模伤亡事件CT分诊方案的评估:两次大规模演习的结果
Eur Radiol. 2009 Aug;19(8):1867-74. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1361-2. Epub 2009 Mar 11.