Conti B, Maier R, Barr A M, Morale M C, Lu X, Sanna P P, Bilbe G, Hoyer D, Bartfai T
Molecular and Integrative Neuroscience Department, Harold L Dorris Neurological Research Institute, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Mol Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;12(2):167-89. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001897. Epub 2006 Oct 10.
The significant proportion of depressed patients that are resistant to monoaminergic drug therapy and the slow onset of therapeutic effects of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)/serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are two major reasons for the sustained search for new antidepressants. In an attempt to identify common underlying mechanisms for fast- and slow-acting antidepressant modalities, we have examined the transcriptional changes in seven different brain regions of the rat brain induced by three clinically effective antidepressant treatments: electro convulsive therapy (ECT), sleep deprivation (SD), and fluoxetine (FLX), the most commonly used slow-onset antidepressant. Each of these antidepressant treatments was applied with the same regimen known to have clinical efficacy: 2 days of ECT (four sessions per day), 24 h of SD, and 14 days of daily treatment of FLX, respectively. Transcriptional changes were evaluated on RNA extracted from seven different brain regions using the Affymetrix rat genome microarray 230 2.0. The gene chip data were validated using in situ hybridization or autoradiography for selected genes. The major findings of the study are: 1. The transcriptional changes induced by SD, ECT and SSRI display a regionally specific distribution distinct to each treatment. 2. The fast-onset, short-lived antidepressant treatments ECT and SD evoked transcriptional changes primarily in the catecholaminergic system, whereas the slow-onset antidepressant FLX treatment evoked transcriptional changes in the serotonergic system. 3. ECT and SD affect in a similar manner the same brain regions, primarily the locus coeruleus, whereas the effects of FLX were primarily in the dorsal raphe and hypothalamus, suggesting that both different regions and pathways account for fast onset but short lasting effects as compared to slow-onset but long-lasting effects. However, the similarity between effects of ECT and SD is somewhat confounded by the fact that the two treatments appear to regulate a number of transcripts in an opposite manner. 4. Multiple transcripts (e.g. brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), serum/glucocorticoid-regulated kinase (Sgk1)), whose level was reported to be affected by antidepressants or behavioral manipulations, were also found to be regulated by the treatments used in the present study. Several novel findings of transcriptional regulation upon one, two or all three treatments were made, for the latter we highlight homer, erg2, HSP27, the proto oncogene ret, sulfotransferase family 1A (Sult1a1), glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPD3), the orphan receptor G protein-coupled receptor 88 (GPR88) and a large number of expressed sequence tags (ESTs). 5. Transcripts encoding proteins involved in synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus were strongly affected by ECT and SD, but not by FLX. The novel transcripts, concomitantly regulated by several antidepressant treatments, may represent novel targets for fast onset, long-duration antidepressants.
相当一部分抑郁症患者对单胺能药物治疗有抵抗性,以及选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)/5-羟色胺/去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRI)治疗效果起效缓慢,是持续寻找新型抗抑郁药的两个主要原因。为了确定快速和缓慢起效的抗抑郁方式的共同潜在机制,我们研究了三种临床有效的抗抑郁治疗方法在大鼠脑的七个不同脑区引起的转录变化:电休克疗法(ECT)、睡眠剥夺(SD)和氟西汀(FLX,最常用的起效缓慢的抗抑郁药)。每种抗抑郁治疗都采用已知具有临床疗效的相同方案:ECT治疗2天(每天4次)、SD持续24小时、FLX每日治疗14天。使用Affymetrix大鼠基因组微阵列230 2.0对从七个不同脑区提取的RNA进行转录变化评估。基因芯片数据通过对选定基因的原位杂交或放射自显影进行验证。该研究的主要发现如下:1. SD、ECT和SSRI引起的转录变化呈现出每种治疗特有的区域特异性分布。2. 起效快、作用时间短的抗抑郁治疗方法ECT和SD主要在儿茶酚胺能系统中引起转录变化,而起效缓慢的抗抑郁药FLX治疗在5-羟色胺能系统中引起转录变化。3. ECT和SD以相似的方式影响相同的脑区,主要是蓝斑,而FLX的作用主要在中缝背核和下丘脑,这表明与起效缓慢但作用持久的效果相比,不同的脑区和通路导致了起效快但作用短暂的效果。然而,ECT和SD效果之间的相似性在一定程度上因以下事实而混淆:这两种治疗似乎以相反的方式调节许多转录本。4. 还发现多种转录本(如脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)、血清/糖皮质激素调节激酶(Sgk1)),其水平据报道受抗抑郁药或行为操作影响,也受本研究中使用的治疗方法调节。在一种、两种或所有三种治疗后有几个转录调控的新发现,对于后者我们重点关注homer、erg2、HSP27、原癌基因ret、磺基转移酶家族1A(Sult1a1)、甘油3-磷酸脱氢酶(GPD3)、孤儿受体G蛋白偶联受体88(GPR88)和大量表达序列标签(EST)。5. 编码海马体中参与突触可塑性的蛋白质的转录本受到ECT和SD的强烈影响,但不受FLX影响。由几种抗抑郁治疗共同调节的新转录本可能代表快速起效、长效抗抑郁药的新靶点。