Suppr超能文献

儿科环境卫生研究中的隐私与伦理——第二部分:保护家庭和社区

Privacy and ethics in pediatric environmental health research-part II: protecting families and communities.

作者信息

Fisher Celia B

机构信息

Center for Ethics Education, Fordham University, Bronx, New York 10458, USA.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Oct;114(10):1622-5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9004.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In pediatric environmental health research, information about family members is often directly sought or indirectly obtained in the process of identifying child risk factors and helping to tease apart and identify interactions between genetic and environmental factors. However, federal regulations governing human subjects research do not directly address ethical issues associated with protections for family members who are not identified as the primary "research participant." Ethical concerns related to family consent and privacy become paramount as pediatric environmental health research increasingly turns to questions of gene-environment interactions.

OBJECTIVES

In this article I identify issues arising from and potential solutions for the privacy and informed consent challenges of pediatric environmental health research intended to adequately protect the rights and welfare of children, family members, and communities.

DISCUSSION

I first discuss family members as secondary research participants and then the specific ethical challenges of longitudinal research on late-onset environmental effects and gene-environment interactions. I conclude with a discussion of the confidentiality and social risks of recruitment and data collection of research conducted within small or unique communities, ethnic minority populations, and low-income families.

CONCLUSIONS

The responsible conduct of pediatric environmental health research must be conceptualized as a goodness of fit between the specific research context and the unique characteristics of subjects and other family stakeholders.

摘要

背景

在儿科环境卫生研究中,关于家庭成员的信息通常是在识别儿童风险因素以及帮助梳理和识别遗传与环境因素之间的相互作用过程中直接获取或间接得到的。然而,关于人类受试者研究的联邦法规并未直接涉及与未被确定为主要“研究参与者”的家庭成员保护相关的伦理问题。随着儿科环境卫生研究越来越多地转向基因 - 环境相互作用问题,与家庭同意和隐私相关的伦理问题变得至关重要。

目标

在本文中,我确定了儿科环境卫生研究在隐私和知情同意方面面临的挑战所产生的问题以及潜在的解决方案,旨在充分保护儿童、家庭成员和社区的权利与福祉。

讨论

我首先讨论家庭成员作为次要研究参与者的情况,然后讨论关于迟发性环境影响和基因 - 环境相互作用的纵向研究的具体伦理挑战。最后,我讨论了在小型或独特社区、少数民族群体以及低收入家庭中开展研究时,招募和数据收集的保密性和社会风险。

结论

儿科环境卫生研究的负责任开展必须被概念化为特定研究背景与受试者及其他家庭利益相关者的独特特征之间的契合度。

相似文献

4
Protecting the privacy of third-party information: recommendations for social and behavioral health researchers.
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jan;64(1):213-22. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.035. Epub 2006 Oct 17.
5
Ethical issues in couple and family research.伴侣与家庭研究中的伦理问题。
J Fam Psychol. 2005 Mar;19(1):157-67. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.157.
8
Informed consent, confidentiality, and subject rights in clinical trials.临床试验中的知情同意、保密及受试者权利。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007 May;4(2):189-93; discussion 193. doi: 10.1513/pats.200701-008GC.

本文引用的文献

3
Impact of environmental tobacco smoke on children with sickle cell disease.环境烟草烟雾对镰状细胞病患儿的影响。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Dec;157(12):1197-201. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.12.1197.
4
Objectivity and ethics in environmental health science.环境卫生科学中的客观性与伦理道德
Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Nov;111(14):1809-18. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6200.
7
Ethical aspects of research into the etiology of autism.自闭症病因研究的伦理问题。
Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2003;9(1):48-53. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.10059.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验