Paulson Jerome A
Mid-Atlantic Center for Children's Health and the Environment, George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Oct;114(10):1603-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9000.
The consideration of ethical issues relating to pediatric environmental health is a recent phenomenon. Discussions of biomedical ethics, research on children, and environmental health research have a longer history. In the late 1990s, researchers at the Kennedy Krieger Institute in Baltimore, Maryland, undertook a study to compare the effectiveness of several methods of reducing lead risk in housing. In a preliminary finding in the case of Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc., a Maryland court questioned the ethics of performing research on children when there is no prospect of direct benefit to those children and whether parents can consent to such research. This case dramatically raised the profile of ethical issues among the pediatric environmental health research community. To broaden the discussion of these issues and in response to the Kennedy-Krieger case, the Children's Environmental Health Network held a working meeting on 5 and 6 March 2004 to explore this topic. The articles in this mini-monograph were prepared by the authors as a result of the workshop and represent their opinions. This article is an introduction to the workshop and a summary of the articles to follow.
对儿科环境卫生相关伦理问题的考量是最近才出现的现象。生物医学伦理讨论、儿童研究以及环境卫生研究有着更长的历史。20世纪90年代末,马里兰州巴尔的摩市肯尼迪·克里格研究所的研究人员开展了一项研究,比较几种降低住房铅风险方法的有效性。在“格里姆斯诉肯尼迪·克里格研究所”案的初步调查结果中,马里兰州一家法院质疑在对儿童进行研究且这些儿童没有直接受益前景时的伦理问题,以及父母是否能同意此类研究。该案件极大地提高了儿科环境卫生研究界对伦理问题的关注度。为了拓宽对这些问题的讨论范围,并回应肯尼迪 - 克里格案,儿童环境卫生网络于2004年3月5日至6日召开了一次工作会议来探讨这一主题。本专题论文集中的文章是作者们基于此次研讨会撰写的,代表了他们的观点。本文是对该研讨会的介绍以及后续文章的总结。