Suppr超能文献

腭咽功能障碍多学科修复治疗的过程与结果研究

Process and outcome study of multidisciplinary prosthetic treatment for velopharyngeal dysfunction.

作者信息

Sell Debbie, Mars Michael, Worrell Emma

机构信息

Speech and Language Therapy Department. Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2006 Sep-Oct;41(5):495-511. doi: 10.1080/13682820500515852.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A prosthetic approach to velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) is not new. However, a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach by a speech-and-language therapist, dental specialist and maxillofacial technician, including accurate fitting using nasendoscopy, has provided an opportunity to define the clinical care pathway, and audit the outcomes of this intervention. Systematic outcome studies of the effectiveness of prosthetic appliances are few and largely anecdotal.

AIMS

The aim is twofold: first, to provide a description of the process including diagnosis, clinical and technical fabrication; and second, to determine the effectiveness of this intervention with nasendoscopy, objective blind perceptual analysis of speech data and nasometry.

METHODS & PROCEDURES: The selection criteria, age, aetiology and process of fabrication are described. Thirty-one patients embarked on the programme, but seven patients after initial failure or refusal were re-entered into the programme for a second time resulting in 38 interventions. At the time of audit, 20 patients had completed the treatment, but four of these were inadequately documented. This study reports on the 16 patients who successfully completed the programme and who had comprehensive records.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the pre- and post-treatment evaluations on the speech parameters of hypernasality, audible nasal emission and nasometry.

CONCLUSIONS

In our centre surgery is the first choice of treatment for VPD, but prosthetic management can be a useful alternative when this is contraindicated, can be a useful temporary solution and can be used to evaluate the potential benefits of surgical intervention in some cases. This treatment requires the combined expertise of an interdisciplinary team involving the speech-and-language therapist, orthodontist/prosthodontist, maxillofacial technician and endoscopist.

摘要

背景

采用修复手段治疗腭咽功能障碍(VPD)并非新鲜事。然而,由言语治疗师、牙科专家和颌面技师组成的跨学科协作团队,包括使用鼻内镜进行精确适配,为确定临床护理路径以及审核该干预措施的效果提供了契机。关于修复器具有效性的系统性结果研究较少,且大多是轶事性的。

目的

目的有两个方面:第一,描述包括诊断、临床和技术制作在内的过程;第二,通过鼻内镜检查、对语音数据进行客观盲态感知分析和鼻音测量来确定该干预措施的有效性。

方法与步骤

描述了选择标准、年龄、病因及制作过程。31名患者开始参与该项目,但7名患者在初次失败或拒绝后再次进入该项目,最终进行了38次干预。在审核时,20名患者完成了治疗,但其中4名记录不完整。本研究报告了16名成功完成项目且有完整记录的患者情况。

结果

治疗前后在高鼻音、可闻鼻漏气和鼻音测量等语音参数评估上存在显著差异。

结论

在我们中心,手术是治疗VPD的首选方法,但在手术禁忌时,修复治疗可作为一种有用的替代方法,可作为一种有用的临时解决方案,并且在某些情况下可用于评估手术干预的潜在益处。这种治疗需要跨学科团队的综合专业知识,该团队包括言语治疗师、正畸医生/修复医生、颌面技师和内镜医生。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验