Vitanzo Peter C, Sennett Brian J
Nonoperative Sports Medicine, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2006 Sep;35(9):421-8.
The original rationale for viscosupplementation with hyaluronans was fluid replacement, suggesting that the most viscous materials (eg, those of highest molecular weight [MW]) would provide the most clinical benefits. However, it has become clear that mechanisms of action for osteoarthritis pain management are not only mechanical but also biological. After intra-articular injection, hyaluronans exert a range of biological actions within the joint. Although high- and low- to mid-MW hyaluronans (but not hyaluronans <500 kDa MW) are more or less active (depending on the specific effect examined), it is not known which actions are clinically meaningful. There is no evidence for a difference between hyaluronan products in clinical efficacy measured as pain relief, but investigators in several preclinical studies evaluating joint-structure modification in osteoarthritis models have reported advantages to using low- to mid-MW hyaluronans.
使用透明质酸进行粘弹性补充的最初理论依据是液体替代,这表明最粘稠的材料(例如,那些分子量[MW]最高的材料)将提供最大的临床益处。然而,目前已经明确,骨关节炎疼痛管理的作用机制不仅是机械性的,也是生物性的。关节内注射后,透明质酸在关节内发挥一系列生物学作用。尽管高MW以及低至中MW的透明质酸(但分子量<500 kDa的透明质酸除外)或多或少都有活性(取决于所研究的具体效应),但尚不清楚哪些作用具有临床意义。没有证据表明透明质酸产品在以疼痛缓解衡量的临床疗效上存在差异,但在几项评估骨关节炎模型中关节结构改变的临床前研究中,研究人员报告了使用低至中MW透明质酸的优势。