Yoshizumi Takahiro, Murase Satomi, Murakami Takashi, Takai Jiro
Graduate School of Education and Human Development, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Psychol Rep. 2006 Aug;99(1):74-84. doi: 10.2466/pr0.99.1.74-84.
The purposes of the present study were to develop a Parenting Scale of Inconsistency and to evaluate its initial reliability and validity. The 12 items assess the inconsistency among parents' moods, behaviors, and attitudes toward children. In the primary study, 517 participants completed three measures: the new Parenting Scale of Inconsistency, the Parental Bonding Instrument, and the Depression Scale of the General Health Questionnaire. The Parenting Scale of Inconsistency had good test-retest reliability of .85 and internal consistency of .88 (Cronbach coefficient alpha). Construct validity was good as Inconsistency scores were significantly correlated with the Care and Overprotection scores of the Parental Bonding Instrument and with the Depression scores. Moreover, Inconsistency scores' relation with a dimension of parenting style distinct from Care and Overprotection suggested that the Parenting Scale of Inconsistency had factorial validity. This scale seems a potential measure for examining the relationships between inconsistent parenting and the mental health of children.
本研究的目的是编制一份不一致育儿量表,并评估其初步的信效度。该量表包含12个项目,用于评估父母在情绪、行为和对孩子的态度方面的不一致性。在初步研究中,517名参与者完成了三项测量:新的不一致育儿量表、父母教养方式问卷和一般健康问卷中的抑郁量表。不一致育儿量表具有良好的重测信度(0.85)和内部一致性(0.88,克朗巴赫系数α)。结构效度良好,因为不一致得分与父母教养方式问卷中的关爱和过度保护得分以及抑郁得分显著相关。此外,不一致得分与不同于关爱和过度保护的教养方式维度之间的关系表明,不一致育儿量表具有因子效度。该量表似乎是检验不一致育儿与儿童心理健康之间关系的一种潜在测量工具。