• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生命的终极意义、临时意义和个人意义:差异与共同点。

Ultimate, provisional, and personal meaning of life: differences and common ground.

作者信息

Auhagen Ann Elisabeth, Holub Franziska

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Free University of Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2006 Aug;99(1):131-46. doi: 10.2466/pr0.99.1.131-146.

DOI:10.2466/pr0.99.1.131-146
PMID:17037460
Abstract

Building on Viktor Frankl's clinical approach of Logotherapy and the works of subsequent theoreticians, three types of meaning of life were theoretically derived and empirically investigated, Ultimate, Provisional, and Personal meaning. These types were characterized, first, by the amount of agreement of subjects, second, by sources of Life Meaning, which were assessed by content analyses, third, by correlations, and fourth by prediction with ratings of important life concepts from the domains of Well-being, Religiosity, and Prosocial Behavior. 192 German adults, 45 men and 147 women, whose M age was 31.6 yr. (SD = 11.9), participated. Analysis indicated different sources for the Ultimate meaning compared with the other meaning types, which seem to display more similarities with each other. Other important life concepts, such as Belief, Harmony, Happiness, and Human Goodness were related to the investigated types of meaning of life. Some implications for clinical applications, research perspectives, and Positive Psychology are discussed.

摘要

基于维克托·弗兰克尔的意义疗法临床方法以及后续理论家的著作,从理论上推导并实证研究了生命意义的三种类型:终极意义、临时意义和个人意义。这些类型的特点,首先是被试的认同程度,其次是生命意义的来源(通过内容分析进行评估),第三是相关性,第四是与幸福、宗教信仰和亲社会行为领域的重要生活概念评分的预测关系。192名德国成年人参与了研究,其中45名男性,147名女性,平均年龄为31.6岁(标准差 = 11.9)。分析表明,与其他意义类型相比,终极意义的来源不同,而其他意义类型之间似乎有更多相似之处。其他重要的生活概念,如信仰、和谐、幸福和人性善良,与所研究的生命意义类型相关。文中还讨论了对临床应用、研究视角和积极心理学的一些启示。

相似文献

1
Ultimate, provisional, and personal meaning of life: differences and common ground.生命的终极意义、临时意义和个人意义:差异与共同点。
Psychol Rep. 2006 Aug;99(1):131-46. doi: 10.2466/pr0.99.1.131-146.
2
Miss B Pursues Death and Miss P Life in the Light of V. E. Frankl's Existential Analysis/Logotherapy.从维克多·E·弗兰克尔的存在主义分析/意义疗法角度看,B小姐追寻死亡而P小姐追寻生命。
Omega (Westport). 2015;71(2):169-97. doi: 10.1177/0030222815570599.
3
[Personal meaning in the elderly: sources of meaning, welfare, coping and attitude to death].[老年人的个人意义:意义来源、幸福感、应对方式及对死亡的态度]
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1996 Feb;27(1):5-13.
4
Existential positive psychology and integrative meaning therapy.存在主义积极心理学与整合意义疗法
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2020 Nov-Dec;32(7-8):565-578. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2020.1814703. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
5
Reflections on the meaning of a Semester at Sea voyage after twenty-two years.
Psychol Rep. 2006 Feb;98(1):209-16. doi: 10.2466/pr0.98.1.209-216.
6
Unamuno on suffering and Frankl's 'will to meaning': a philo-logotherapeutic advice to humankind here and beyond and the role of social relations towards mental fitness.乌纳穆诺论痛苦与弗兰克尔的“意义意志”:灵医哲学对人类此间与彼岸的建议,以及社会关系对心理健康的作用。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Aug 25;44(3):e424. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab270.
7
The Meaning of Life and Death in the Eyes of Frankl: Archetypal and Terror Management Perspectives.弗兰克尔眼中生死的意义:原型与恐惧管理视角
Eur J Psychol. 2021 Aug 31;17(3):164-175. doi: 10.5964/ejop.4689. eCollection 2021 Aug.
8
Meaning-in-Life: A Vital Salutogenic Resource for Health生活意义:健康的一种重要的致健康源资源
9
Meaning in life for individuals with physical disabilities.身体残疾者的生活意义。
Psychol Rep. 2006 Jun;98(3):683-8. doi: 10.2466/pr0.98.3.683-688.
10
[Meaning in life and mental health: personal meaning systems of psychotherapists and psychotherapy patients].[生活意义与心理健康:心理治疗师和心理治疗患者的个人意义系统]
Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2010;56(4):358-72. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2010.56.4.358.

引用本文的文献

1
Cannabis consumption and prosociality.大麻消费与亲社会行为。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 19;12(1):8352. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12202-8.